Understanding the factors behind racial and ethnic disparities in the adoption of alternative financial services: a decomposition analysis

IF 6.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jonghee Lee, Kyoung Tae Kim, Jae Min Lee
{"title":"Understanding the factors behind racial and ethnic disparities in the adoption of alternative financial services: a decomposition analysis","authors":"Jonghee Lee, Kyoung Tae Kim, Jae Min Lee","doi":"10.1108/ijbm-03-2023-0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this study was to examine racial/ethnic differences in AFS use and their contributing factors using a decomposition analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The 2018 National Financial Capability Study dataset was used to analyze the four major types of AFS—title loans, payday loans, pawnshops, and rent-to-own (RTO) stores—as proxies for AFS use. The study conducted both logistic regression analysis and decomposition analysis to examine the contributing factors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results of the logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant disparities in the use of alternative financial services (AFS) among racial and ethnic groups. Specifically, it was found that Blacks were more likely to utilize title and payday loans, pawnshops, and rent-to-own (RTO) stores compared to Whites. In contrast, Hispanics and Asians/individuals of other ethnicities were less likely to use title loans, but Hispanics were more likely to opt for payday loans over Whites. Furthermore, objective financial literacy exhibited a negative association with the likelihood of using these four types of AFS, whereas subjective financial literacy consistently showed a positive association. When examining the decomposition analyses, it became evident that both objective and subjective financial literacy played significant roles in explaining the racial and ethnic disparities in AFS usage. However, the patterns varied in three specific pairwise comparisons.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study revealed the relative contributions of each factor to the racial/ethnic disparities through decomposition analysis. Our Fairlie decomposition approach addressed non-linearities within the decomposition framework, particularly in estimating the probabilities of AFS utilization, given its binary outcomes. This extension builds upon the Oaxaca decomposition. The study offers valuable insights into the variations in AFS use among different racial and ethnic groups.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51401,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","volume":"25 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bank Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-03-2023-0136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine racial/ethnic differences in AFS use and their contributing factors using a decomposition analysis.

Design/methodology/approach

The 2018 National Financial Capability Study dataset was used to analyze the four major types of AFS—title loans, payday loans, pawnshops, and rent-to-own (RTO) stores—as proxies for AFS use. The study conducted both logistic regression analysis and decomposition analysis to examine the contributing factors.

Findings

The results of the logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant disparities in the use of alternative financial services (AFS) among racial and ethnic groups. Specifically, it was found that Blacks were more likely to utilize title and payday loans, pawnshops, and rent-to-own (RTO) stores compared to Whites. In contrast, Hispanics and Asians/individuals of other ethnicities were less likely to use title loans, but Hispanics were more likely to opt for payday loans over Whites. Furthermore, objective financial literacy exhibited a negative association with the likelihood of using these four types of AFS, whereas subjective financial literacy consistently showed a positive association. When examining the decomposition analyses, it became evident that both objective and subjective financial literacy played significant roles in explaining the racial and ethnic disparities in AFS usage. However, the patterns varied in three specific pairwise comparisons.

Originality/value

This study revealed the relative contributions of each factor to the racial/ethnic disparities through decomposition analysis. Our Fairlie decomposition approach addressed non-linearities within the decomposition framework, particularly in estimating the probabilities of AFS utilization, given its binary outcomes. This extension builds upon the Oaxaca decomposition. The study offers valuable insights into the variations in AFS use among different racial and ethnic groups.

了解采用替代性金融服务的种族和民族差异背后的因素:分解分析
本研究的目的是使用分解分析法研究使用替代金融服务的种族/族裔差异及其促成因素。设计/方法/途径2018年国家金融能力研究数据集被用来分析四种主要类型的替代金融服务--产权贷款、发薪日贷款、典当行和以租代购(RTO)商店--作为替代金融服务使用的代用指标。研究采用了逻辑回归分析和分解分析的方法来研究各种因素。研究结果逻辑回归分析的结果表明,不同种族和族裔群体在使用替代金融服务方面存在显著差异。具体而言,与白人相比,黑人更倾向于使用产权贷款和发薪日贷款、典当行和 "先租后买"(RTO)商店。相比之下,西班牙裔和亚裔/其他族裔的个人不太可能使用产权贷款,但西班牙裔比白人更可能选择发薪日贷款。此外,客观金融素养与使用这四种金融服务的可能性呈负相关,而主观金融素养则一直呈正相关。在进行分解分析时,我们发现客观和主观的金融知识在解释使用 AFS 的种族和民族差异方面都发挥了重要作用。本研究通过分解分析揭示了各因素对种族/民族差异的相对贡献。我们的费尔利分解方法解决了分解框架中的非线性问题,特别是在估计二元结果下使用美国家庭护理服务的概率时。这一扩展以瓦哈卡分解法为基础。这项研究为了解不同种族和族裔群体在使用美国家庭护理服务方面的差异提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
18.90%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: International Journal of Bank Marketing (IJBM) aims to publish papers that relate to the marketing challenges of financial services providers around the globe. Preference is given to empirically-based research papers that expand on existing theories (or develop new ones) on customer behaviour in financial services settings. In addition, the journal is interested in helping academicians and practitioners in the field to better understand the discipline of financial services marketing, and as a result review papers and thought pieces are invited for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信