The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations

IF 2.7 3区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Deepa Oommen
{"title":"The relationship between management vs nonmanagement status and women employees’ dissent expression in US organizations","authors":"Deepa Oommen","doi":"10.1108/ijcma-10-2023-0216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to test whether a) differences existed in dissent expression between women in management and nonmanagement positions and b) the differences varied between white women and women of color.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Responses from 1,011 employed women in the US were analyzed for the study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Results revealed that in management vs nonmanagement status, women employees were more likely to express upward dissent and employ dissent strategies that signified both influence and lack of influence in organizations. However, race-based differences existed in the expressions of some forms of dissent.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Research has shown that employees in management vs nonmanagement status express more upward dissent and employ dissent strategies that signify influence in organizations. However, can this be the case for women employees? Although previous research has explored dissent expression extensively in US organizations, women employees' dissent expression has not received much attention in social-scientific studies. In these studies, gender and race were treated as mere demographic variables to describe sample compositions despite these variables being influential factors in organizational life. Through an intersectional approach to identities, this study’s findings call upon organizations to address iniquities that limit dissent expression based on identity hierarchies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47382,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Conflict Management","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Conflict Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-10-2023-0216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to test whether a) differences existed in dissent expression between women in management and nonmanagement positions and b) the differences varied between white women and women of color.

Design/methodology/approach

Responses from 1,011 employed women in the US were analyzed for the study.

Findings

Results revealed that in management vs nonmanagement status, women employees were more likely to express upward dissent and employ dissent strategies that signified both influence and lack of influence in organizations. However, race-based differences existed in the expressions of some forms of dissent.

Originality/value

Research has shown that employees in management vs nonmanagement status express more upward dissent and employ dissent strategies that signify influence in organizations. However, can this be the case for women employees? Although previous research has explored dissent expression extensively in US organizations, women employees' dissent expression has not received much attention in social-scientific studies. In these studies, gender and race were treated as mere demographic variables to describe sample compositions despite these variables being influential factors in organizational life. Through an intersectional approach to identities, this study’s findings call upon organizations to address iniquities that limit dissent expression based on identity hierarchies.

美国企业中管理层与非管理层地位与女员工异议表达的关系
研究结果研究结果显示,在管理层与非管理层中,女性员工更有可能表达向上的异议,并采用表示对组织有影响力和缺乏影响力的异议策略。原创性/价值研究表明,管理层员工与非管理层员工相比,更倾向于表达向上的异议,并采用表示在组织中具有影响力和缺乏影响力的异议策略。然而,女性员工的情况是否也是如此呢?尽管以往的研究广泛探讨了美国组织中的异议表达,但女性员工的异议表达在社会科学研究中并未得到广泛关注。在这些研究中,性别和种族仅仅被视为描述样本组成的人口统计学变量,尽管这些变量是组织生活中的影响因素。通过对身份的交叉研究,本研究的发现呼吁组织解决基于身份等级限制异议表达的不公正现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信