Clinical validation of the ineffective social support network nursing diagnosis in violence‐victimized women

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Camila EL Farias, Ryanne CMG Mendes, Marcos VO Lopes, Michelline S França, Jaqueline GA Perrelli, Cleide M Pontes, Suzana O Mangueira
{"title":"Clinical validation of the ineffective social support network nursing diagnosis in violence‐victimized women","authors":"Camila EL Farias, Ryanne CMG Mendes, Marcos VO Lopes, Michelline S França, Jaqueline GA Perrelli, Cleide M Pontes, Suzana O Mangueira","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo verify clinical validity evidence for the ineffective social support network nursing diagnosis.MethodA quantitative, descriptive, cross‐sectional study was performed with 98 violence‐victimized women treated in two reference centers for violence in the city of Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The women were interviewed from August 2021 to June 2022.FindingsThe clinical indicators that best predicted the nursing diagnosis were as follows: Frustration with unmet support expectations, negative social interaction, perceived neglect of support demands, feeling of abandonment, low reciprocity, and encouragement of negative behaviors. Etiological factors that showed greater association were excessive demand for support, limited social network, social isolation, the fragility of institutional service networked organizations, and inadequate appreciation of available social support.ConclusionsThe clinical validity evidence for the ineffective social support network nursing diagnosis has been verified. Thus, the validated clinical indicators and etiological factors can accurately diagnose and predict the emergence of this phenomenon in violence‐victimized women.Implications for nursing practiceThe results contribute to advancing scientific knowledge in nursing teaching, research, and practice and support the nursing process in violence‐victimized women.","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12476","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo verify clinical validity evidence for the ineffective social support network nursing diagnosis.MethodA quantitative, descriptive, cross‐sectional study was performed with 98 violence‐victimized women treated in two reference centers for violence in the city of Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The women were interviewed from August 2021 to June 2022.FindingsThe clinical indicators that best predicted the nursing diagnosis were as follows: Frustration with unmet support expectations, negative social interaction, perceived neglect of support demands, feeling of abandonment, low reciprocity, and encouragement of negative behaviors. Etiological factors that showed greater association were excessive demand for support, limited social network, social isolation, the fragility of institutional service networked organizations, and inadequate appreciation of available social support.ConclusionsThe clinical validity evidence for the ineffective social support network nursing diagnosis has been verified. Thus, the validated clinical indicators and etiological factors can accurately diagnose and predict the emergence of this phenomenon in violence‐victimized women.Implications for nursing practiceThe results contribute to advancing scientific knowledge in nursing teaching, research, and practice and support the nursing process in violence‐victimized women.
受暴力侵害妇女社会支持网络无效护理诊断的临床验证
目的 对无效社会支持网络护理诊断的临床有效性证据进行验证。方法 对巴西伯南布哥州累西腓市两家暴力参考中心接受治疗的 98 名受暴力侵害妇女进行了一项定量、描述性、横断面研究。这些妇女在 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 6 月期间接受了访谈。研究结果最能预测护理诊断的临床指标如下:对未满足的支持期望感到沮丧、消极的社会互动、对支持需求的忽视感、被遗弃感、低互惠性以及对消极行为的鼓励。对支持的过度需求、有限的社会网络、社会隔离、机构服务网络组织的脆弱性以及对现有社会支持的认识不足等病因因素显示出更大的关联性。结论无效社会支持网络护理诊断的临床有效性证据得到了验证,因此,经过验证的临床指标和病因因素可以准确诊断和预测暴力受害妇女出现这一现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信