Creating a shared vision of preparing scholarly practitioners: an EdD faculty collaborative autoethnography

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Veselina Lambrev, Bárbara C. Cruz, Sarah M. Kiefer, Elizabeth Shaunessy-Dedrick
{"title":"Creating a shared vision of preparing scholarly practitioners: an EdD faculty collaborative autoethnography","authors":"Veselina Lambrev, Bárbara C. Cruz, Sarah M. Kiefer, Elizabeth Shaunessy-Dedrick","doi":"10.1108/sgpe-02-2024-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In this collaborative autoethnographic study, four faculty members in a US-based Doctor of Education (EdD) program reflected individually and collectively in the authors’ community of practice through reflective journaling, self-reflection and discussion sessions to analyze the individual stories critically. This study aims to examine the influence of the authors’ involvement with an EdD program on the academic approaches to teaching, research and mentoring EdD students.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Professional practice doctorates have emerged in response to the growing need for practitioners to use evidence for continuous improvement. Although the literature has highlighted faculty members as change agents redefining the EdD as a professional practice doctorate, minimal research has explored how their involvement in such design work may affect their academic practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors perceived the involvement with the EdD program as transforming the faculty practices in five ways (i.e. shifting the epistemologies, embracing practice-based pedagogies, engaging in practice-based research, mentoring scholarly practitioners and intentional community building) and creating a shared vision of preparing scholarly practitioners.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The authors draw implications for redesigning EdD programs through participation in a faculty community of practice, prompting faculty to shift their practices to better support scholarly practitioners and affecting their identity as teachers, mentors and program developers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42038,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-02-2024-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In this collaborative autoethnographic study, four faculty members in a US-based Doctor of Education (EdD) program reflected individually and collectively in the authors’ community of practice through reflective journaling, self-reflection and discussion sessions to analyze the individual stories critically. This study aims to examine the influence of the authors’ involvement with an EdD program on the academic approaches to teaching, research and mentoring EdD students.

Design/methodology/approach

Professional practice doctorates have emerged in response to the growing need for practitioners to use evidence for continuous improvement. Although the literature has highlighted faculty members as change agents redefining the EdD as a professional practice doctorate, minimal research has explored how their involvement in such design work may affect their academic practices.

Findings

The authors perceived the involvement with the EdD program as transforming the faculty practices in five ways (i.e. shifting the epistemologies, embracing practice-based pedagogies, engaging in practice-based research, mentoring scholarly practitioners and intentional community building) and creating a shared vision of preparing scholarly practitioners.

Originality/value

The authors draw implications for redesigning EdD programs through participation in a faculty community of practice, prompting faculty to shift their practices to better support scholarly practitioners and affecting their identity as teachers, mentors and program developers.

创建培养学术实践者的共同愿景:教育博士教师合作自述
目的 在这项合作性自述研究中,美国一个教育博士(EdD)项目的四位教师通过写反思日记、自我反省和讨论等方式,在作者的实践社区中进行了个人和集体反思,对个人故事进行了批判性分析。本研究旨在探讨作者参与教育博士项目对教学、研究和指导教育博士生的学术方法的影响。设计/方法/途径专业实践博士的出现是为了满足从业人员日益增长的利用证据进行持续改进的需求。尽管有文献强调教师是将教育博士学位重新定义为专业实践博士学位的变革推动者,但很少有研究探讨教师参与此类设计工作会如何影响他们的学术实践。原创性/价值作者通过参与教师实践社区的活动,对重新设计教育博士项目产生了影响,促使教师转变他们的做法,以更好地支持学术实践者,并影响他们作为教师、导师和项目开发者的身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education
Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信