Interpret the estimand framework from a causal inference perspective

Jinghong Zeng
{"title":"Interpret the estimand framework from a causal inference perspective","authors":"Jinghong Zeng","doi":"arxiv-2407.00292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The estimand framework proposed by ICH in 2017 has brought fundamental\nchanges in the pharmaceutical industry. It clearly describes how a treatment\neffect in a clinical question should be precisely defined and estimated,\nthrough attributes including treatments, endpoints and intercurrent events.\nHowever, ideas around the estimand framework are commonly in text, and\ndifferent interpretations on this framework may exist. This article aims to\ninterpret the estimand framework through its underlying theories, the causal\ninference framework based on potential outcomes. The statistical origin and\nformula of an estimand is given through the causal inference framework, with\nall attributes translated into statistical terms. How five strategies proposed\nby ICH to analyze intercurrent events are incorporated in the statistical\nformula of an estimand is described, and a new strategy to analyze intercurrent\nevents is also suggested. The roles of target populations and analysis sets in\nthe estimand framework are compared and discussed based on the statistical\nformula of an estimand. This article recommends continuing study of causal\ninference theories behind the estimand framework and improving the estimand\nframework with greater methodological comprehensibility and availability.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.00292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimand framework proposed by ICH in 2017 has brought fundamental changes in the pharmaceutical industry. It clearly describes how a treatment effect in a clinical question should be precisely defined and estimated, through attributes including treatments, endpoints and intercurrent events. However, ideas around the estimand framework are commonly in text, and different interpretations on this framework may exist. This article aims to interpret the estimand framework through its underlying theories, the causal inference framework based on potential outcomes. The statistical origin and formula of an estimand is given through the causal inference framework, with all attributes translated into statistical terms. How five strategies proposed by ICH to analyze intercurrent events are incorporated in the statistical formula of an estimand is described, and a new strategy to analyze intercurrent events is also suggested. The roles of target populations and analysis sets in the estimand framework are compared and discussed based on the statistical formula of an estimand. This article recommends continuing study of causal inference theories behind the estimand framework and improving the estimand framework with greater methodological comprehensibility and availability.
从因果推理的角度解释估计值框架
2017 年 ICH 提出的估计值框架给制药行业带来了根本性的变革。它明确描述了临床问题中的治疗效果应如何通过包括治疗、终点和并发事件在内的属性进行精确定义和估算。然而,围绕estimand框架的观点常见于文本中,对这一框架可能存在不同的解释。本文旨在通过其基础理论--基于潜在结果的因果推断框架--来解释估计值框架。通过因果推理框架给出估计值的统计起源和公式,并将所有属性转化为统计术语。介绍了如何将非物质文化遗产提出的五种分析并发事件的策略纳入估算对象的统计公式,并提出了一种分析并发事件的新策略。根据估算指标的统计公式,比较并讨论了目标人群和分析集在估算指标框架中的作用。本文建议继续研究估计指标框架背后的因果推断理论,并改进估计指标框架,使其在方法上更加易懂和可用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信