De-mystifying the Influence of PhET Simulation on Engagement, Satisfaction, and Academic Achievement of Bhutanese Students in the Physics Classroom

IF 3.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tshering Dorji, Sumitra Subba, Tshering Zangmo
{"title":"De-mystifying the Influence of PhET Simulation on Engagement, Satisfaction, and Academic Achievement of Bhutanese Students in the Physics Classroom","authors":"Tshering Dorji, Sumitra Subba, Tshering Zangmo","doi":"10.1007/s10956-024-10131-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study employed a non-equivalent quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control-group design to study the effect of the PhET simulation intervention on students’ engagement, satisfaction, and academic achievement in the learning of direct current electric circuit concepts among Bhutanese students. We analysed the pre- and post-test scores and perceptions of 57 ninth-grade students, divided into experimental group (EG, <i>n</i> = 29) and control group (CG, <i>n</i> = 28), from one high school in Paro District, Bhutan<i>.</i> The EG students were taught with the PhET simulation intervention, while the CG students were taught with the traditional chalk-talk method. The pre- and post-test scores were collected with the Electric Circuits Conceptual Evaluation (ECEE) inventory. Mean, standard deviation, a two-sample <i>t</i>-test, and multiple linear regression (MLR) were computed using R and RStudio. The <i>t</i>-test revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean post-test scores of CG and EG students. MLR analysis further confirmed that this difference was due to the PhET simulation intervention, ruling out the influence of other confounding variables. Additionally, an instrument called the PhET Engagement-Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed to assess EG students’ engagement level and satisfaction with the PhET simulation intervention. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha calculation confirmed its validity and reliability. Data from the PhET Engagement-Satisfaction Questionnaire unveiled significant impact of the PhET simulation intervention on students’ engagement level and their overall satisfaction, reinforcing prior research. However, further research with a larger sample size, incorporating lesson observations, interviews, and our measurement tool, is necessary to ascertain whether the findings it yields align with the present study’s findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Education and Technology","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10131-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study employed a non-equivalent quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control-group design to study the effect of the PhET simulation intervention on students’ engagement, satisfaction, and academic achievement in the learning of direct current electric circuit concepts among Bhutanese students. We analysed the pre- and post-test scores and perceptions of 57 ninth-grade students, divided into experimental group (EG, n = 29) and control group (CG, n = 28), from one high school in Paro District, Bhutan. The EG students were taught with the PhET simulation intervention, while the CG students were taught with the traditional chalk-talk method. The pre- and post-test scores were collected with the Electric Circuits Conceptual Evaluation (ECEE) inventory. Mean, standard deviation, a two-sample t-test, and multiple linear regression (MLR) were computed using R and RStudio. The t-test revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean post-test scores of CG and EG students. MLR analysis further confirmed that this difference was due to the PhET simulation intervention, ruling out the influence of other confounding variables. Additionally, an instrument called the PhET Engagement-Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed to assess EG students’ engagement level and satisfaction with the PhET simulation intervention. Confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha calculation confirmed its validity and reliability. Data from the PhET Engagement-Satisfaction Questionnaire unveiled significant impact of the PhET simulation intervention on students’ engagement level and their overall satisfaction, reinforcing prior research. However, further research with a larger sample size, incorporating lesson observations, interviews, and our measurement tool, is necessary to ascertain whether the findings it yields align with the present study’s findings.

Abstract Image

去神秘化 PhET 模拟对不丹学生物理课堂参与度、满意度和学习成绩的影响
本研究采用前测/后测对照组的非等效准实验设计,研究 PhET 模拟干预对不丹学生学习直流电路概念的参与度、满意度和学业成绩的影响。我们分析了不丹帕罗区一所高中 57 名九年级学生的前后测试成绩和看法,他们分为实验组(EG,n = 29)和对照组(CG,n = 28)。实验组学生采用 PhET 模拟干预教学,对照组学生则采用传统的粉笔讲授法。通过电路概念评估(ECEE)问卷收集了测试前后的分数。使用 R 和 RStudio 计算了平均值、标准偏差、双样本 t 检验和多元线性回归 (MLR)。t 检验显示,CG 和 EG 学生的测验后平均得分在统计学上存在显著差异。MLR 分析进一步证实,这种差异是 PhET 模拟干预造成的,排除了其他混杂变量的影响。此外,还开发了一个名为 "PhET 参与度-满意度问卷 "的工具,以评估 EG 学生对 PhET 模拟干预的参与度和满意度。确认性因子分析和 Cronbach's alpha 计算证实了该问卷的有效性和可靠性。PhET 参与度-满意度调查问卷的数据显示,PhET 模拟干预对学生的参与度和总体满意度有显著影响,巩固了之前的研究。不过,有必要进一步开展样本量更大的研究,结合课程观察、访谈和我们的测量工具,以确定其得出的结论是否与本研究的结论一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Journal of Science Education and Technology EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Education and Technology is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of original peer-reviewed, contributed and invited research articles of the highest quality that address the intersection of science education and technology with implications for improving and enhancing science education at all levels across the world. Topics covered can be categorized as disciplinary (biology, chemistry, physics, as well as some applications of computer science and engineering, including the processes of learning, teaching and teacher development), technological (hardware, software, deigned and situated environments involving applications characterized as with, through and in), and organizational (legislation, administration, implementation and teacher enhancement). Insofar as technology plays an ever-increasing role in our understanding and development of science disciplines, in the social relationships among people, information and institutions, the journal includes it as a component of science education. The journal provides a stimulating and informative variety of research papers that expand and deepen our theoretical understanding while providing practice and policy based implications in the anticipation that such high-quality work shared among a broad coalition of individuals and groups will facilitate future efforts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信