Resolvent analysis of swirling turbulent jets

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Quentin Chevalier, Christopher M. Douglas, Lutz Lesshafft
{"title":"Resolvent analysis of swirling turbulent jets","authors":"Quentin Chevalier,&nbsp;Christopher M. Douglas,&nbsp;Lutz Lesshafft","doi":"10.1007/s00162-024-00704-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores coherent structures in a swirling turbulent jet. Stationary axisymmetric solutions of the Reynolds–Averaged Navier–Stokes equations at <span>\\(Re=200,000\\)</span> were obtained using an open source computational fluid dynamics code and the Spalart–Allmaras eddy viscosity model. Then, resolvent analysis with the same eddy viscosity field provided coherent structures of the turbulent fluctuations on the base flow. As in many earlier studies, a large gain separation is identified between the optimal and sub-optimal resolvent modes, permitting a focus on the most amplified response mode and its corresponding optimal forcing. At zero swirl, the results indicate that the jet’s coherent response is dominated by axisymmetric (<span>\\(m=0\\)</span>) structures, which are driven by the usual Kelvin–Helmholtz shear amplification mechanism. However, as swirl is increased, different coherent structures begin to dominate the response. For example, double and triple spiral (<span>\\(|m|=2\\)</span> and <span>\\(|m|=3\\)</span>) modes are identified as the dominant structures when the axial and azimuthal velocity maxima of the base flow are comparable. In this case, distinct co- and counter-rotating <span>\\(|m|=2\\)</span> modes experience vastly different degrees of amplification. The physics of this selection process involve several amplification mechanisms contributing simultaneously in different regions of the mode. This is analysed in more detail by comparing the alignment between the wavevector of the dominant response mode and the principal shear direction of the base flow. Additional discussion also considers the development of structures along the exterior of the jet nozzle.</p>","PeriodicalId":795,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"38 5","pages":"641 - 663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-024-00704-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores coherent structures in a swirling turbulent jet. Stationary axisymmetric solutions of the Reynolds–Averaged Navier–Stokes equations at \(Re=200,000\) were obtained using an open source computational fluid dynamics code and the Spalart–Allmaras eddy viscosity model. Then, resolvent analysis with the same eddy viscosity field provided coherent structures of the turbulent fluctuations on the base flow. As in many earlier studies, a large gain separation is identified between the optimal and sub-optimal resolvent modes, permitting a focus on the most amplified response mode and its corresponding optimal forcing. At zero swirl, the results indicate that the jet’s coherent response is dominated by axisymmetric (\(m=0\)) structures, which are driven by the usual Kelvin–Helmholtz shear amplification mechanism. However, as swirl is increased, different coherent structures begin to dominate the response. For example, double and triple spiral (\(|m|=2\) and \(|m|=3\)) modes are identified as the dominant structures when the axial and azimuthal velocity maxima of the base flow are comparable. In this case, distinct co- and counter-rotating \(|m|=2\) modes experience vastly different degrees of amplification. The physics of this selection process involve several amplification mechanisms contributing simultaneously in different regions of the mode. This is analysed in more detail by comparing the alignment between the wavevector of the dominant response mode and the principal shear direction of the base flow. Additional discussion also considers the development of structures along the exterior of the jet nozzle.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

漩涡湍流喷流的残留分析
摘要 本研究探讨了漩涡湍流射流中的相干结构。使用开放源计算流体动力学代码和Spalart-Allmaras涡粘模型获得了雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯方程在\(Re=200,000\)条件下的静态轴对称解。然后,使用相同的涡粘场进行解析分析,得到了基流上湍流波动的相干结构。与之前的许多研究一样,最优和次优解析模式之间存在较大的增益分隔,因此可以将重点放在放大程度最大的响应模式及其相应的最优强迫上。在零漩涡时,结果表明射流的相干响应由轴对称(\(m=0\))结构主导,该结构由通常的开尔文-赫尔姆霍兹剪切放大机制驱动。然而,随着漩涡的增加,不同的相干结构开始主导响应。例如,当基流的轴向和方位速度最大值相当时,双螺旋和三螺旋(\(|m|=2\)和\(|m|=3\))模式被确定为主导结构。在这种情况下,不同的同向和反向旋转 \(|m|=2\)模式会经历不同程度的放大。这种选择过程的物理学原理涉及在模式的不同区域同时产生的几种放大机制。通过比较主要响应模式的波矢量与基流主剪切方向之间的排列,可以更详细地分析这一点。其他讨论还考虑了沿喷射喷嘴外部结构的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics provides a forum for the cross fertilization of ideas, tools and techniques across all disciplines in which fluid flow plays a role. The focus is on aspects of fluid dynamics where theory and computation are used to provide insights and data upon which solid physical understanding is revealed. We seek research papers, invited review articles, brief communications, letters and comments addressing flow phenomena of relevance to aeronautical, geophysical, environmental, material, mechanical and life sciences. Papers of a purely algorithmic, experimental or engineering application nature, and papers without significant new physical insights, are outside the scope of this journal. For computational work, authors are responsible for ensuring that any artifacts of discretization and/or implementation are sufficiently controlled such that the numerical results unambiguously support the conclusions drawn. Where appropriate, and to the extent possible, such papers should either include or reference supporting documentation in the form of verification and validation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信