A comprehensive analysis of agent factorization and learning algorithms in multiagent systems

IF 2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Andreas Kallinteris, Stavros Orfanoudakis, Georgios Chalkiadakis
{"title":"A comprehensive analysis of agent factorization and learning algorithms in multiagent systems","authors":"Andreas Kallinteris,&nbsp;Stavros Orfanoudakis,&nbsp;Georgios Chalkiadakis","doi":"10.1007/s10458-024-09662-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In multiagent systems, agent factorization denotes the process of segmenting the state-action space of the environment into distinct components, each corresponding to an individual agent, and subsequently determining the interactions among these agents. Effective agent factorization significantly influences the system performance of real-world industrial applications. In this work, we try to assess the performance impact of agent factorization when using different learning algorithms in multiagent coordination settings; and thus discover the source of performance quality of the multiagent solution derived by combining different factorizations with different learning algorithms. To this end, we evaluate twelve different agent factorization instances—or <i>agent definitions</i>—in the warehouse traffic management domain, comparing the training performance of (primarily) three learning algorithms suitable for learning coordinated multiagent policies: the Evolutionary Strategies (<i>ES</i>), the Canonical Evolutionary Strategies (<i>CES</i>), and a genetic algorithm (<i>CCEA</i>) previously used in a similar setting. Our results demonstrate that the performance of different learning algorithms is affected in different ways by alternative agent definitions. Given this, we can conclude that many important multiagent coordination problems can eventually be solved more efficiently by a suitable agent factorization combined with an appropriate choice of a learning algorithm. Moreover, our work shows that ES and CES are effective learning algorithms for the warehouse traffic management domain, while, interestingly, celebrated policy gradient methods do not fare well in this complex real-world problem setting. As such, our work offers insights into the intrinsic properties of the learning algorithms that make them well-suited for this problem domain. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need to identify appropriate agent definitions-multiagent learning algorithm pairings in order to solve specific complex problems effectively, and provides insights into the general characteristics that such pairings must possess to address broad classes of multiagent learning and coordination problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55586,"journal":{"name":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-024-09662-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In multiagent systems, agent factorization denotes the process of segmenting the state-action space of the environment into distinct components, each corresponding to an individual agent, and subsequently determining the interactions among these agents. Effective agent factorization significantly influences the system performance of real-world industrial applications. In this work, we try to assess the performance impact of agent factorization when using different learning algorithms in multiagent coordination settings; and thus discover the source of performance quality of the multiagent solution derived by combining different factorizations with different learning algorithms. To this end, we evaluate twelve different agent factorization instances—or agent definitions—in the warehouse traffic management domain, comparing the training performance of (primarily) three learning algorithms suitable for learning coordinated multiagent policies: the Evolutionary Strategies (ES), the Canonical Evolutionary Strategies (CES), and a genetic algorithm (CCEA) previously used in a similar setting. Our results demonstrate that the performance of different learning algorithms is affected in different ways by alternative agent definitions. Given this, we can conclude that many important multiagent coordination problems can eventually be solved more efficiently by a suitable agent factorization combined with an appropriate choice of a learning algorithm. Moreover, our work shows that ES and CES are effective learning algorithms for the warehouse traffic management domain, while, interestingly, celebrated policy gradient methods do not fare well in this complex real-world problem setting. As such, our work offers insights into the intrinsic properties of the learning algorithms that make them well-suited for this problem domain. More broadly, our work demonstrates the need to identify appropriate agent definitions-multiagent learning algorithm pairings in order to solve specific complex problems effectively, and provides insights into the general characteristics that such pairings must possess to address broad classes of multiagent learning and coordination problems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多代理系统中代理因式分解和学习算法的综合分析
在多代理系统中,代理因子化是指将环境的状态-行动空间分割成不同的组件(每个组件对应一个单独的代理),然后确定这些代理之间相互作用的过程。有效的代理因子化会极大地影响现实世界工业应用的系统性能。在这项工作中,我们试图评估在多代理协调设置中使用不同学习算法时代理因子化对性能的影响;从而发现通过将不同因子化与不同学习算法相结合而得出的多代理解决方案的性能质量来源。为此,我们在仓库交通管理领域评估了 12 种不同的代理因子化实例或代理定义,比较了(主要是)三种适合学习多代理协调策略的学习算法的训练性能:进化策略(ES)、典型进化策略(CES)和以前在类似环境中使用过的遗传算法(CCEA)。我们的研究结果表明,不同学习算法的性能会受到其他代理定义的不同影响。有鉴于此,我们可以得出结论,许多重要的多代理协调问题最终都可以通过合适的代理因子化结合适当的学习算法来更高效地解决。此外,我们的研究还表明,ES 和 CES 是适用于仓库交通管理领域的有效学习算法,而有趣的是,著名的策略梯度法在这一复杂的现实世界问题中表现不佳。因此,我们的工作为学习算法的内在特性提供了见解,这些特性使它们非常适合这一问题领域。从更广泛的意义上讲,我们的工作表明,为了有效解决特定的复杂问题,有必要确定适当的代理定义--多代理学习算法配对,并深入探讨了此类配对必须具备的一般特性,以解决广泛类别的多代理学习和协调问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is the official journal of the International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. It provides a leading forum for disseminating significant original research results in the foundations, theory, development, analysis, and applications of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Coverage in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems includes, but is not limited to: Agent decision-making architectures and their evaluation, including: cognitive models; knowledge representation; logics for agency; ontological reasoning; planning (single and multi-agent); reasoning (single and multi-agent) Cooperation and teamwork, including: distributed problem solving; human-robot/agent interaction; multi-user/multi-virtual-agent interaction; coalition formation; coordination Agent communication languages, including: their semantics, pragmatics, and implementation; agent communication protocols and conversations; agent commitments; speech act theory Ontologies for agent systems, agents and the semantic web, agents and semantic web services, Grid-based systems, and service-oriented computing Agent societies and societal issues, including: artificial social systems; environments, organizations and institutions; ethical and legal issues; privacy, safety and security; trust, reliability and reputation Agent-based system development, including: agent development techniques, tools and environments; agent programming languages; agent specification or validation languages Agent-based simulation, including: emergent behavior; participatory simulation; simulation techniques, tools and environments; social simulation Agreement technologies, including: argumentation; collective decision making; judgment aggregation and belief merging; negotiation; norms Economic paradigms, including: auction and mechanism design; bargaining and negotiation; economically-motivated agents; game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative); social choice and voting Learning agents, including: computational architectures for learning agents; evolution, adaptation; multi-agent learning. Robotic agents, including: integrated perception, cognition, and action; cognitive robotics; robot planning (including action and motion planning); multi-robot systems. Virtual agents, including: agents in games and virtual environments; companion and coaching agents; modeling personality, emotions; multimodal interaction; verbal and non-verbal expressiveness Significant, novel applications of agent technology Comprehensive reviews and authoritative tutorials of research and practice in agent systems Comprehensive and authoritative reviews of books dealing with agents and multi-agent systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信