The prospect theory and the idiosyncratic risk-return linkage: a quantile regression approach for Vietnam’s stock market

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ho Hoang Gia Bao, Thi Hai Ly Tran, Thi Thu Hong Dinh
{"title":"The prospect theory and the idiosyncratic risk-return linkage: a quantile regression approach for Vietnam’s stock market","authors":"Ho Hoang Gia Bao, Thi Hai Ly Tran, Thi Thu Hong Dinh","doi":"10.1108/mf-10-2023-0630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper scrutinizes the relationship between idiosyncratic risks and stock returns at different quantiles, especially the extremely low and high ones, to explore the applicability of the Prospect Theory’s rationale in Vietnam’s stock market.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The Prospect Theory demonstrates that investors’ attitudes towards risks can change from risk-seeking in the loss domain to risk-averse in the gain domain. This can be observed by the negative (positive) connection between idiosyncratic risks and returns for the losing (winning) stocks. To explore if the aforesaid patterns occur in Vietnam’s stock market, this paper employs the quantile regression method which is suitable for inspecting the relationship at the high and low tails of the stock returns.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The estimation results acknowledge the changes in attitudes towards risks as mentioned by the Prospect Theory.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The negative relationship between idiosyncratic risks and stock returns confirms investors’ risk-seeking behavior in the loss domain, which is in line with the prediction of the Prospect Theory. This behavior may cause worse investment performance as the losing stocks in investors’ portfolios remain overvalued, leading to subsequent negative returns. Therefore, investors should establish and follow their investment disciplines to protect themselves from larger losses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Existing research found little evidence for the Prospect Theory’s rationale in Vietnam’s stock market, which can stem from the usage of the conditional-mean regression methods. Different from the prior studies, this paper is the first to apply the quantile regression method and provide new evidence supporting the Prospect Theory’s rationale in Vietnam’s stock market.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18140,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Finance","volume":"152 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-10-2023-0630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper scrutinizes the relationship between idiosyncratic risks and stock returns at different quantiles, especially the extremely low and high ones, to explore the applicability of the Prospect Theory’s rationale in Vietnam’s stock market.

Design/methodology/approach

The Prospect Theory demonstrates that investors’ attitudes towards risks can change from risk-seeking in the loss domain to risk-averse in the gain domain. This can be observed by the negative (positive) connection between idiosyncratic risks and returns for the losing (winning) stocks. To explore if the aforesaid patterns occur in Vietnam’s stock market, this paper employs the quantile regression method which is suitable for inspecting the relationship at the high and low tails of the stock returns.

Findings

The estimation results acknowledge the changes in attitudes towards risks as mentioned by the Prospect Theory.

Practical implications

The negative relationship between idiosyncratic risks and stock returns confirms investors’ risk-seeking behavior in the loss domain, which is in line with the prediction of the Prospect Theory. This behavior may cause worse investment performance as the losing stocks in investors’ portfolios remain overvalued, leading to subsequent negative returns. Therefore, investors should establish and follow their investment disciplines to protect themselves from larger losses.

Originality/value

Existing research found little evidence for the Prospect Theory’s rationale in Vietnam’s stock market, which can stem from the usage of the conditional-mean regression methods. Different from the prior studies, this paper is the first to apply the quantile regression method and provide new evidence supporting the Prospect Theory’s rationale in Vietnam’s stock market.

前景理论与特异性风险收益联系:越南股票市场的量化回归方法
本文仔细研究了不同数量级(尤其是极低和极高数量级)的特异性风险与股票收益之间的关系,以探讨前景理论的原理在越南股票市场的适用性。这可以从亏损(获胜)股票的特异性风险与收益之间的负向(正向)联系中观察到。为了探讨越南股市是否存在上述模式,本文采用了量子回归法,该方法适用于考察股票收益率高尾和低尾的关系。由于投资者投资组合中的亏损股票仍然被高估,这种行为可能会导致投资业绩恶化,从而导致后续的负收益。因此,投资者应建立并遵守自己的投资纪律,以保护自己免受更大的损失。原创性/价值现有研究发现,越南股市中几乎没有证据证明前景理论的合理性,这可能源于条件均值回归方法的使用。与之前的研究不同,本文首次在越南股市中应用了量化回归方法,并提供了支持前景理论原理的新证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Managerial Finance
Managerial Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Managerial Finance provides an international forum for the publication of high quality and topical research in the area of finance, such as corporate finance, financial management, financial markets and institutions, international finance, banking, insurance and risk management, real estate and financial education. Theoretical and empirical research is welcome as well as cross-disciplinary work, such as papers investigating the relationship of finance with other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信