Factors Influencing the Implementing Readiness of Shared Medical Appointments in China's Primary Healthcare Institutions: A Mixed-Method Study Utilizing Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Wei Yang, Lingrui Liu, Jiajia Chen, Run Mao, Tao Yang, Lang Linghu, Lieyu Huang, Dong (Roman) Xu, Yiyuan Cai
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Implementing Readiness of Shared Medical Appointments in China's Primary Healthcare Institutions: A Mixed-Method Study Utilizing Qualitative Comparative Analysis","authors":"Wei Yang, Lingrui Liu, Jiajia Chen, Run Mao, Tao Yang, Lang Linghu, Lieyu Huang, Dong (Roman) Xu, Yiyuan Cai","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.19.24309131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a mounting public health concern in China, home to the largest number of patients with diabetes globally. A primary challenge has been the integration of high-quality chronic disease services, with poor outcomes and inefficient health management intensifying the disease burden. Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs) offer a promising solution, yet evidence of their practical application in resource-limited settings like China's primary healthcare institutions is scant. This study aims to evaluate the organizational readiness for change (ORC) in implementing SMA services in Guizhou province's primary healthcare institutions and to identify determinants of high-level ORC to foster implementation success. Methods This study employed a mixed-method approach. The validated Chinese version of the Workplace Readiness Questionnaire (WRQ-CN) was used to assess the ORC status across 12 institutions participating in the SMART pilot trial. A Normalization Process Theory (NPT) -guided qualitative interview and quantitative survey were used to collect the conditions. Data analysis encompassed standardized descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation analysis, and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to discern condition variables and configurations that are favorable to high-level ORC. Results The study engaged 70 institutional participants, including administrators, clinicians, and public health workers. The median ORC score was 105.20 (101.23-107.33). We identified 12 condition variables through the interview and survey. The Spearman correlation analysis highlighted a moderate correlation between Specific tasks and responsibilities (r=0.393, p=0.206) and Key participants (r=0.316, p=0.317) with ORC. QCA also revealed these condition configurations and pathways that collectively align with heightened ORC, accentuating the pivotal role of key participants.\nConclusions This study unveiled a spectrum of dynamic conditions and pathways affecting ORC, which are consistent with the NPT-based theoretical steps. They were essential for attaining high-level ORC in rolling out health service innovations like the SMART study, especially in resource-limited settings.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"165 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.19.24309131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a mounting public health concern in China, home to the largest number of patients with diabetes globally. A primary challenge has been the integration of high-quality chronic disease services, with poor outcomes and inefficient health management intensifying the disease burden. Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs) offer a promising solution, yet evidence of their practical application in resource-limited settings like China's primary healthcare institutions is scant. This study aims to evaluate the organizational readiness for change (ORC) in implementing SMA services in Guizhou province's primary healthcare institutions and to identify determinants of high-level ORC to foster implementation success. Methods This study employed a mixed-method approach. The validated Chinese version of the Workplace Readiness Questionnaire (WRQ-CN) was used to assess the ORC status across 12 institutions participating in the SMART pilot trial. A Normalization Process Theory (NPT) -guided qualitative interview and quantitative survey were used to collect the conditions. Data analysis encompassed standardized descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation analysis, and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to discern condition variables and configurations that are favorable to high-level ORC. Results The study engaged 70 institutional participants, including administrators, clinicians, and public health workers. The median ORC score was 105.20 (101.23-107.33). We identified 12 condition variables through the interview and survey. The Spearman correlation analysis highlighted a moderate correlation between Specific tasks and responsibilities (r=0.393, p=0.206) and Key participants (r=0.316, p=0.317) with ORC. QCA also revealed these condition configurations and pathways that collectively align with heightened ORC, accentuating the pivotal role of key participants. Conclusions This study unveiled a spectrum of dynamic conditions and pathways affecting ORC, which are consistent with the NPT-based theoretical steps. They were essential for attaining high-level ORC in rolling out health service innovations like the SMART study, especially in resource-limited settings.
影响中国基层医疗卫生机构实施共享医疗预约的因素:采用定性比较分析的混合方法研究
背景与目标 中国是全球糖尿病患者人数最多的国家,糖尿病(DM)是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。一个主要的挑战是如何整合高质量的慢性病服务,不良的治疗效果和低效的健康管理加重了疾病负担。共享医疗预约(SMA)提供了一个很有前景的解决方案,但在中国基层医疗机构等资源有限的环境中实际应用的证据却很少。本研究旨在评估贵州省基层医疗卫生机构在实施SMA服务过程中的组织变革准备(ORC)情况,并找出促进成功实施的高水平ORC的决定因素。方法 本研究采用混合方法。使用经过验证的中文版工作场所准备程度问卷(WRQ-CN)来评估 12 家参与 SMART 试点的机构的 ORC 状况。在归一化过程理论(NPT)的指导下,采用定性访谈和定量调查的方法收集数据。数据分析包括标准化描述性统计、斯皮尔曼相关分析和定性比较分析(QCA),以确定有利于高水平 ORC 的条件变量和配置。结果 这项研究有 70 个机构参与,包括管理人员、临床医生和公共卫生工作人员。ORC 分数的中位数为 105.20(101.23-107.33)。我们通过访谈和调查确定了 12 个条件变量。斯皮尔曼相关分析显示,特定任务和责任(r=0.393,p=0.206)与关键参与者(r=0.316,p=0.317)与 ORC 之间存在中度相关性。本研究揭示了影响 ORC 的一系列动态条件和途径,这些条件和途径与基于 NPT 的理论步骤相一致。这些条件和途径对于在推广 SMART 研究等医疗服务创新时实现高水平的 ORC 至关重要,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信