Healthcare Disparities Among Older Adults: Exploring Social Determinants of Health and Cognition Levels

Zahra Rahemi, Juanita-Dawne R. Bacsu, Sophia Z. Shalhout, Maryam S. Sadafipoor, Matthew Lee Smith, Swann Arp Adams
{"title":"Healthcare Disparities Among Older Adults: Exploring Social Determinants of Health and Cognition Levels","authors":"Zahra Rahemi, Juanita-Dawne R. Bacsu, Sophia Z. Shalhout, Maryam S. Sadafipoor, Matthew Lee Smith, Swann Arp Adams","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.29.24309705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nBackground. The purpose was to investigate the impact of sociodemographic factors on healthcare utilization among adults with different cognition levels (normal and impairment/dementia).\nMethods. We used cross-sectional data from the Health and Retirement Study (N=17,698) to assess healthcare utilization: hospital stay, nursing home stay, hospice care, and doctor visits.\nResults. A cohort comparison between normal and dementia/impaired cognition groups revealed significant differences. The dementia/impaired group had lower education levels, higher single/widowed status, and more racial and ethnic minorities. They experienced longer hospital and nursing home stays, varied doctor visit frequencies, and had higher mean age, greater loneliness scores, and lower family social support scores. Differences in hospitalization, nursing home, hospice care, and doctor visits were influenced by factors such as race, age, marital status, education, and rurality.\nConclusion. There were disparities in healthcare utilization based on participants characteristics and cognition levels, especially in terms of race/ethnicity, education, and rural location.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.29.24309705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background. The purpose was to investigate the impact of sociodemographic factors on healthcare utilization among adults with different cognition levels (normal and impairment/dementia). Methods. We used cross-sectional data from the Health and Retirement Study (N=17,698) to assess healthcare utilization: hospital stay, nursing home stay, hospice care, and doctor visits. Results. A cohort comparison between normal and dementia/impaired cognition groups revealed significant differences. The dementia/impaired group had lower education levels, higher single/widowed status, and more racial and ethnic minorities. They experienced longer hospital and nursing home stays, varied doctor visit frequencies, and had higher mean age, greater loneliness scores, and lower family social support scores. Differences in hospitalization, nursing home, hospice care, and doctor visits were influenced by factors such as race, age, marital status, education, and rurality. Conclusion. There were disparities in healthcare utilization based on participants characteristics and cognition levels, especially in terms of race/ethnicity, education, and rural location.
老年人的医疗差距:探索健康和认知水平的社会决定因素
摘要背景。目的是调查社会人口因素对不同认知水平(正常和受损/痴呆)的成年人使用医疗服务的影响。我们利用健康与退休研究(Health and Retirement Study,N=17,698)的横截面数据评估了医疗保健利用情况:住院、入住疗养院、临终关怀和就医。认知能力正常组与痴呆/认知能力受损组的队列比较显示出显著差异。痴呆症/认知功能受损组的受教育程度较低,单身/丧偶比例较高,少数种族和少数民族较多。他们住院和住疗养院的时间更长,看医生的频率不同,平均年龄更高,孤独感得分更高,家庭社会支持得分更低。住院、疗养院、临终关怀和就医方面的差异受到种族、年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度和居住地等因素的影响。根据参与者的特征和认知水平,尤其是种族/民族、教育程度和农村地区,在医疗保健利用方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信