An assessment of the Health Information System in Khomas region, Namibia

Veronika Jatileni, Edward Nicol
{"title":"An assessment of the Health Information System in Khomas region, Namibia","authors":"Veronika Jatileni, Edward Nicol","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.28.24309648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:\nA robust and well-functioning Health Information System (HIS) is crucial for managing patient care, monitoring health system performance, and informing public health decisions. However, Namibia, like many developing countries, faces challenges in its HIS, such as limited financial and human resources, knowledge gaps, inadequate infrastructure, and behavioural barriers such as resistance to adopting new systems and a lack of supportive policies. Previous studies have not shown significant improvements since 2012. This study in Namibia's Khomas region aims to assess human factors affecting the HIS and evaluate progress made from 2012 to 2022. It will use recommendations from a 2012 assessment by USAID to provide insights and propose ways to enhance healthcare delivery and resource allocation. Methods and analysis:\nThis study utilizes a cross-sectional design employing a multi-method approach to evaluate the performance of the Health Information System (HIS). Qualitative methods include conducting 17 in-depth interviews with key informants, a retrospective document review from the Ministry of Health and Social Services headquarters in Windhoek, supplemented by a modified office/facility checklist from all 14 health facilities in the Khomas region. The quantitative methods involve administering a questionnaire to 330 staff members, utilizing an adapted version of the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM)’s Organizational and Behavioural Assessment Tool (OBAT). Descriptive statistics will be applied to analyse the quantitative data, while a deductive interpretive approach will be used for qualitative data analysis. Ethics and dissemination:\nThe protocol was approved by the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (Reference No: S23/05/119), the Namibia ministry of Health and Social Services (Reference No: 22/3/2/1) and will adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964). The study aims to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing recommendations across different levels of the Health Information System (HIS), with a focus on improving the HIS in the Khomas region. Outputs will include communicating the findings to the study population, presenting at both local and international conferences, and publishing peer-reviewed journal articles.","PeriodicalId":501556,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Systems and Quality Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.28.24309648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A robust and well-functioning Health Information System (HIS) is crucial for managing patient care, monitoring health system performance, and informing public health decisions. However, Namibia, like many developing countries, faces challenges in its HIS, such as limited financial and human resources, knowledge gaps, inadequate infrastructure, and behavioural barriers such as resistance to adopting new systems and a lack of supportive policies. Previous studies have not shown significant improvements since 2012. This study in Namibia's Khomas region aims to assess human factors affecting the HIS and evaluate progress made from 2012 to 2022. It will use recommendations from a 2012 assessment by USAID to provide insights and propose ways to enhance healthcare delivery and resource allocation. Methods and analysis: This study utilizes a cross-sectional design employing a multi-method approach to evaluate the performance of the Health Information System (HIS). Qualitative methods include conducting 17 in-depth interviews with key informants, a retrospective document review from the Ministry of Health and Social Services headquarters in Windhoek, supplemented by a modified office/facility checklist from all 14 health facilities in the Khomas region. The quantitative methods involve administering a questionnaire to 330 staff members, utilizing an adapted version of the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM)’s Organizational and Behavioural Assessment Tool (OBAT). Descriptive statistics will be applied to analyse the quantitative data, while a deductive interpretive approach will be used for qualitative data analysis. Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the Stellenbosch University Health Research Ethics Committee (Reference No: S23/05/119), the Namibia ministry of Health and Social Services (Reference No: 22/3/2/1) and will adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1964). The study aims to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing recommendations across different levels of the Health Information System (HIS), with a focus on improving the HIS in the Khomas region. Outputs will include communicating the findings to the study population, presenting at both local and international conferences, and publishing peer-reviewed journal articles.
纳米比亚霍马斯地区卫生信息系统评估
导言:一个稳健且运作良好的卫生信息系统(HIS)对于管理病人护理、监测卫生系统绩效以及为公共卫生决策提供信息至关重要。然而,纳米比亚与许多发展中国家一样,在卫生信息系统方面面临着各种挑战,如财力和人力资源有限、知识差距、基础设施不足以及行为障碍,如抵制采用新系统和缺乏支持性政策。以往的研究表明,自 2012 年以来,情况并没有明显改善。这项在纳米比亚霍马斯地区开展的研究旨在评估影响人类信息系统的人为因素,并评估 2012 年至 2022 年期间取得的进展。研究将利用美国国际开发署(USAID)在 2012 年评估中提出的建议,为加强医疗保健服务和资源分配提供见解和建议。方法与分析:本研究采用横断面设计,运用多种方法评估医疗信息系统(HIS)的绩效。定性方法包括与主要信息提供者进行 17 次深入访谈,对温得和克卫生与社会服务部总部的文件进行回顾性审查,并对霍马斯地区所有 14 家医疗机构的办公室/设施清单进行修改补充。定量方法包括对 330 名工作人员进行问卷调查,使用的是经过改编的常规信息系统管理绩效(PRISM)组织和行为评估工具(OBAT)。描述性统计将用于分析定量数据,而演绎解释法将用于定性数据分析。伦理与传播:该方案已获得斯坦陵布什大学健康研究伦理委员会(编号:S23/05/119)和纳米比亚卫生与社会服务部(编号:22/3/2/1)的批准,并将遵守《赫尔辛基宣言》(1964 年)的原则。该研究旨在确定在各级卫生信息系统(HIS)中实施建议的障碍和促进因素,重点是改进霍马斯地区的卫生信息系统。研究成果将包括向研究对象通报研究结果、在当地和国际会议上介绍研究成果以及在同行评审期刊上发表文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信