Acute Changes in QRS Voltage in the Bipolar Leads on the Surface ECG Following Therapy in Acute Congestive Cardiac Failure Patients

Srilakshmi M. Adhyapak, Ashwin Alex, Nirmal Rozario, Tinku Thomas, Kiron Varghese
{"title":"Acute Changes in QRS Voltage in the Bipolar Leads on the Surface ECG Following Therapy in Acute Congestive Cardiac Failure Patients","authors":"Srilakshmi M. Adhyapak, Ashwin Alex, Nirmal Rozario, Tinku Thomas, Kiron Varghese","doi":"10.1007/s42399-024-01703-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following decongestive therapy in patients with acute heart failure, it has been observed that there is an increase in the QRS amplitude in the bipolar limb leads on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG). We wanted to study this phenomenon to identify any markers of improvements in heart failure. Patients with atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, implanted permanent pacemaker, acute coronary syndrome and those treated with sodium nitroprusside were excluded. Net fluid loss over the course of diuresis was calculated as fluid lost-fluid administered. All patients had two standard 12-lead ECGs recorded at admission prior to starting diuresis and after conclusion of therapy which was at discharge. There were 59 patients. All were treated with decongestive therapy and observed over a period of 8 ± 3.2 days. The urine output following therapy was similar in both groups of patients. The left ventricular internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd) and left ventricular internal diameter in systole (LVIDs) were less in the group with increase in QRS amplitude (Group 2) compared to the group who did not show change in QRS amplitude (Group 1), 4.4 <span>\\(\\pm\\)</span> 0.8 cm vs 4.9 <span>\\(\\pm\\)</span> 0.8 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.036, and 3.1 <span>\\(\\pm\\)</span> 0.5 cm vs 3.7 <span>\\(\\pm\\)</span> 1.0 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.002. The ratio between the peak velocity blood flow in early (E wave) and late diastole (A wave) in group 2 was 1.2 <span>\\(\\pm\\)</span> 0.7 compared to 1.7 <span>\\(\\pm\\)</span> 1.0 in group 1, <i>p</i> = 0.087. The deceleration time (DT) was higher by 45.2 <span>\\(\\pm\\)</span> 21.5 ms in group 2 compared to group 1 with no change in QRS amplitude, <i>p</i> = 0.04. Following decongestive therapy in a group of patients with heart failure, the QRS amplitude reflected in the limb leads improved significantly from pre-treatment values in the patients with less LV remodelling in terms of LV dilatation and LV diastolic dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21944,"journal":{"name":"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-024-01703-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following decongestive therapy in patients with acute heart failure, it has been observed that there is an increase in the QRS amplitude in the bipolar limb leads on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG). We wanted to study this phenomenon to identify any markers of improvements in heart failure. Patients with atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, implanted permanent pacemaker, acute coronary syndrome and those treated with sodium nitroprusside were excluded. Net fluid loss over the course of diuresis was calculated as fluid lost-fluid administered. All patients had two standard 12-lead ECGs recorded at admission prior to starting diuresis and after conclusion of therapy which was at discharge. There were 59 patients. All were treated with decongestive therapy and observed over a period of 8 ± 3.2 days. The urine output following therapy was similar in both groups of patients. The left ventricular internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd) and left ventricular internal diameter in systole (LVIDs) were less in the group with increase in QRS amplitude (Group 2) compared to the group who did not show change in QRS amplitude (Group 1), 4.4 \(\pm\) 0.8 cm vs 4.9 \(\pm\) 0.8 cm, p = 0.036, and 3.1 \(\pm\) 0.5 cm vs 3.7 \(\pm\) 1.0 cm, p = 0.002. The ratio between the peak velocity blood flow in early (E wave) and late diastole (A wave) in group 2 was 1.2 \(\pm\) 0.7 compared to 1.7 \(\pm\) 1.0 in group 1, p = 0.087. The deceleration time (DT) was higher by 45.2 \(\pm\) 21.5 ms in group 2 compared to group 1 with no change in QRS amplitude, p = 0.04. Following decongestive therapy in a group of patients with heart failure, the QRS amplitude reflected in the limb leads improved significantly from pre-treatment values in the patients with less LV remodelling in terms of LV dilatation and LV diastolic dysfunction.

Abstract Image

急性充血性心力衰竭患者接受治疗后体表心电图双极导联 QRS 电压的急性变化
据观察,急性心力衰竭患者接受减充血治疗后,表面心电图(ECG)双极肢导联的 QRS 波幅会增大。我们希望对这一现象进行研究,以确定心力衰竭改善的标志物。我们排除了心房扑动、心房颤动、植入永久起搏器、急性冠状动脉综合征以及接受硝普钠治疗的患者。利尿过程中的净体液流失量按流失体液-给药体液计算。所有患者在入院开始利尿前和治疗结束出院时均记录了两次标准的 12 导联心电图。共有 59 名患者。所有患者都接受了减充血治疗,并观察了 8 ± 3.2 天。两组患者治疗后的尿量相似。QRS波幅增大组(第2组)与QRS波幅无变化组(第1组)相比,舒张期左心室内径(LVIDd)和收缩期左心室内径(LVIDs)均较小,而QRS波幅增大组(第2组)与QRS波幅无变化组(第1组)相比,舒张期左心室内径(LVIDd)和收缩期左心室内径(LVIDs)均较小。4 (\pm) 0.8 cm vs 4.9 (\pm) 0.8 cm,p = 0.036;3.1 (\pm) 0.5 cm vs 3.7 (\pm) 1.0 cm,p = 0.002。第2组患者舒张早期(E波)和舒张晚期(A波)的血流峰值速度之比为1.2(\(\pm\) 0.7,而第1组为1.7(\(\pm\) 1.0,p = 0.087。第2组的减速时间(DT)比第1组高45.2 ( \(\pm\) 21.5 ms,QRS波幅无变化,p = 0.04。在对一组心力衰竭患者进行减充血治疗后,在左心室扩张和左心室舒张功能障碍方面左心室重塑程度较低的患者中,肢导联反映的QRS波幅较治疗前有明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信