Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Patrizia Sulis, Paola Proietti
{"title":"Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens","authors":"Patrizia Sulis, Paola Proietti","doi":"10.1177/23998083241260757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scarcity or lack of access to essential services at the local and neighbourhood levels in cities can result in significant spatial inequalities, as some areas and their residents can deal with disadvantages and a lower quality of daily life. In particular, the spatial distribution and the variety of amenities at the local scale represent an important feature of the liveliness of places. The local availability and access to essential services are particularly relevant for some demographic groups experiencing limited mobility or mobility poverty, such as older adults living in cities, and spatial disparities have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted severe difficulties in accessing essential services. This work explores the issue focussing on the following question: who can access what depending on where they live in cities? Using Machine Learning and Spatial Autocorrelation applied to different data sources for spatial information on the location of urban amenities and Internet access, this work aims to identify the most underserved places in terms of the variety of available amenities and access to quality broadband in three European capital cities. A comparison to urban areas where high percentages of older adults reside makes it possible to identify where residents can locally access several essential services (green spaces, health care, and local shopping) and where this need cannot be satisfied because of a lack in the amenity variety available at walking distance to their home. The combination of underserved areas with a high concentration of senior residents identifies left-behind areas in these cities, where interventions on inequalities are most needed. Results can inform policies aiming at favouring fair access to services at the local scale, possibly including slow and active mobility modes, and in general to develop comprehensive and sustainable planning strategies for cities, leaving no place and no person behind.","PeriodicalId":11863,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241260757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scarcity or lack of access to essential services at the local and neighbourhood levels in cities can result in significant spatial inequalities, as some areas and their residents can deal with disadvantages and a lower quality of daily life. In particular, the spatial distribution and the variety of amenities at the local scale represent an important feature of the liveliness of places. The local availability and access to essential services are particularly relevant for some demographic groups experiencing limited mobility or mobility poverty, such as older adults living in cities, and spatial disparities have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted severe difficulties in accessing essential services. This work explores the issue focussing on the following question: who can access what depending on where they live in cities? Using Machine Learning and Spatial Autocorrelation applied to different data sources for spatial information on the location of urban amenities and Internet access, this work aims to identify the most underserved places in terms of the variety of available amenities and access to quality broadband in three European capital cities. A comparison to urban areas where high percentages of older adults reside makes it possible to identify where residents can locally access several essential services (green spaces, health care, and local shopping) and where this need cannot be satisfied because of a lack in the amenity variety available at walking distance to their home. The combination of underserved areas with a high concentration of senior residents identifies left-behind areas in these cities, where interventions on inequalities are most needed. Results can inform policies aiming at favouring fair access to services at the local scale, possibly including slow and active mobility modes, and in general to develop comprehensive and sustainable planning strategies for cities, leaving no place and no person behind.
谁能获得什么?揭示城市老年人在获得服务方面的不平等现象
在城市的地方和邻里层面,基本服务的稀缺或缺乏可能导致严重的空间不平等,因为一些地区及其居民可能会面临不利条件和较低的日常生活质量。特别是,地方规模的空间分布和各种便利设施是地方活力的一个重要特征。对于一些行动不便或行动贫困的人口群体(如生活在城市中的老年人)来说,当地基本服务的可用性和可及性尤为重要,而 COVID-19 大流行病则进一步加剧了空间差异,凸显了获取基本服务的严重困难。这项工作探讨了这一问题,重点是以下问题:哪些人可以根据他们在城市中的居住地获得哪些服务?这项研究利用机器学习和空间自相关技术,将城市设施和互联网接入位置的空间信息应用于不同的数据源,旨在确定欧洲三个首府城市中在可用设施种类和优质宽带接入方面服务最不足的地方。通过与老年人居住比例较高的城市地区进行比较,可以确定哪些地方的居民可以在当地获得一些基本服务(绿地、医疗保健和当地购物),哪些地方的居民由于在步行距离内缺乏各种便利设施而无法满足这一需求。服务不足的地区与老年居民高度集中的地区相结合,确定了这些城市中最需要干预不平等问题的落后地区。研究结果可以为制定政策提供参考,这些政策旨在促进在地方范围内公平获得服务,可能包括慢速和积极的交通模式,总之,为城市制定全面和可持续的规划战略,不遗漏任何地方,不遗漏任何人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信