A randomized controlled study of a second grade numeracy intervention with Swedish students at‐risk of mathematics difficulties

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Hanna Lindström‐Sandahl, Joakim Samuelsson, Henrik Danielsson, Stefan Samuelsson, Åsa Elwér
{"title":"A randomized controlled study of a second grade numeracy intervention with Swedish students at‐risk of mathematics difficulties","authors":"Hanna Lindström‐Sandahl, Joakim Samuelsson, Henrik Danielsson, Stefan Samuelsson, Åsa Elwér","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundEarly numeracy interventions including basic arithmetic are crucial for young students at risk for early mathematics difficulties (MDs), yet few studies have evaluated numeracy interventions in second grade with a randomized controlled design.AimThis pre‐ and post‐test randomized controlled study evaluated the effects of an intensive 9‐week numeracy and arithmetic programme for second‐grade students at risk for early MDs. The focus of the programme was students’ foundational understanding of numbers and mathematical concepts and procedural fluency with arithmetic tasks.SampleA total of 753 first‐grade students from 21 schools in Sweden were screened for low achievement in number knowledge and arithmetic.MethodsStudents considered at risk for MDs (≤25 percentile on two consecutive first‐grade mathematics screenings) were individually randomized to an intervention group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 32) or control group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 30) at the beginning of second grade (7–8 years old). Trained teachers administered the one‐to‐one, explicit programme to intervention group students in elementary school settings. The intervention group received numeracy instruction emphasizing foundational mathematics concepts and procedures. Controls received teaching as usual with potential special education support provided by their schools.ResultsThe intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in conceptual knowledge, arithmetic calculations and problem‐solving compared to the control group, with medium size effects observed.ConclusionsA supplemental and intensive programme, with explicit instruction emphasizing numeracy, substantially improved knowledge and skills essential for arithmetic learning. Instruction in conceptual number knowledge and procedures also shows a significant impact on basic arithmetic problem‐solving.","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundEarly numeracy interventions including basic arithmetic are crucial for young students at risk for early mathematics difficulties (MDs), yet few studies have evaluated numeracy interventions in second grade with a randomized controlled design.AimThis pre‐ and post‐test randomized controlled study evaluated the effects of an intensive 9‐week numeracy and arithmetic programme for second‐grade students at risk for early MDs. The focus of the programme was students’ foundational understanding of numbers and mathematical concepts and procedural fluency with arithmetic tasks.SampleA total of 753 first‐grade students from 21 schools in Sweden were screened for low achievement in number knowledge and arithmetic.MethodsStudents considered at risk for MDs (≤25 percentile on two consecutive first‐grade mathematics screenings) were individually randomized to an intervention group (n = 32) or control group (n = 30) at the beginning of second grade (7–8 years old). Trained teachers administered the one‐to‐one, explicit programme to intervention group students in elementary school settings. The intervention group received numeracy instruction emphasizing foundational mathematics concepts and procedures. Controls received teaching as usual with potential special education support provided by their schools.ResultsThe intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in conceptual knowledge, arithmetic calculations and problem‐solving compared to the control group, with medium size effects observed.ConclusionsA supplemental and intensive programme, with explicit instruction emphasizing numeracy, substantially improved knowledge and skills essential for arithmetic learning. Instruction in conceptual number knowledge and procedures also shows a significant impact on basic arithmetic problem‐solving.
针对有数学困难风险的瑞典学生的二年级计算能力干预随机对照研究
背景早期算术干预(包括基础算术)对于面临早期数学困难(MD)风险的低年级学生至关重要,但很少有研究采用随机对照设计对二年级的算术干预进行评估。方法在二年级(7-8 岁)开始时,将被认为有可能患上早期失智症的学生(在连续两次一年级数学筛查中得分≤25%)单独随机分配到干预组(n = 32)或对照组(n = 30)。经过培训的教师在小学环境中为干预组学生实施一对一的明确课程。干预组接受计算教学,强调基础数学概念和程序。结果与对照组相比,干预组在概念性知识、算术计算和问题解决方面都有显著提高,效果中等。结论一个补充性的强化课程,加上强调计算能力的明确教学,大大提高了算术学习所必需的知识和技能。概念性数字知识和程序的教学对基本算术问题的解决也有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信