Muhammad Shahid, Khalil Ahmad, Ayesha Haider, Safdar Ali
{"title":"Decentralization and rural–urban income inequality: implications for inverted-U hypothesis of Pakistan","authors":"Muhammad Shahid, Khalil Ahmad, Ayesha Haider, Safdar Ali","doi":"10.1007/s40844-024-00285-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The decentralization process greatly improves a society's welfare by offering public goods and services. Inequality between rural and urban areas as well as the overall effects of decentralization is examined in this study in Pakistan. In addition, the rural–urban inverted-U hypothesis is investigated for a country-specific focus on Pakistan using a time-series data set spanning the years 1985 to 2020. Using the auto-regressive distributive lag model (ARDL) bounds testing co-integration method, variables are evaluated over the long run and their error correction dynamic is applied to short-run instants of the variables. The study's findings successfully demonstrate the opposite of what is typically found for the implications of rural inequality owing to fiscal decentralization, namely that fiscal decentralization has exacerbated the overall inequality situation in rural and urban Pakistan. Decentralization in politics and administration is more beneficial for enhancing the overall and urban income distribution in Pakistan. Decentralization has, however, affected rural regions' income distribution in both directions. Furthermore, for both the national economy and urban regions, the GDP per capita growth rate and its square support Kuznet's inverted U-shape theory. However, the distribution of income in Pakistan's rural areas does not support this theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":44114,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-024-00285-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The decentralization process greatly improves a society's welfare by offering public goods and services. Inequality between rural and urban areas as well as the overall effects of decentralization is examined in this study in Pakistan. In addition, the rural–urban inverted-U hypothesis is investigated for a country-specific focus on Pakistan using a time-series data set spanning the years 1985 to 2020. Using the auto-regressive distributive lag model (ARDL) bounds testing co-integration method, variables are evaluated over the long run and their error correction dynamic is applied to short-run instants of the variables. The study's findings successfully demonstrate the opposite of what is typically found for the implications of rural inequality owing to fiscal decentralization, namely that fiscal decentralization has exacerbated the overall inequality situation in rural and urban Pakistan. Decentralization in politics and administration is more beneficial for enhancing the overall and urban income distribution in Pakistan. Decentralization has, however, affected rural regions' income distribution in both directions. Furthermore, for both the national economy and urban regions, the GDP per capita growth rate and its square support Kuznet's inverted U-shape theory. However, the distribution of income in Pakistan's rural areas does not support this theory.
通过提供公共产品和服务,权力下放进程极大地改善了社会福利。本研究考察了巴基斯坦城乡之间的不平等以及权力下放的总体影响。此外,本研究还利用 1985 年至 2020 年的时间序列数据集,针对巴基斯坦的具体国情,对城乡倒 U 型假说进行了研究。利用自回归分布滞后模型(ARDL)边界检验协整方法,对变量进行了长期评估,并将其误差修正动态应用于变量的短期瞬间。研究结果成功地表明,财政权力下放对农村不平等的影响与通常发现的情况恰恰相反,即财政权力下放加剧了巴基斯坦农村和城市的整体不平等状况。政治和行政权力下放更有利于促进巴基斯坦的总体和城市收入分配。然而,权力下放对农村地区的收入分配产生了双向影响。此外,就国民经济和城市地区而言,人均国内生产总值增长率及其平方均支持库兹涅特的倒 U 型理论。然而,巴基斯坦农村地区的收入分配却不支持这一理论。
期刊介绍:
The Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review (EIER) is issued by the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics to provide an international forum for new theoretical and empirical approaches to evolutionary and institutional economics. EIER, free from the view of equilibrium economics and methodological individualism, should face the diversity of human behavior and dynamic transformation of institutions. In EIER, “economics” is used in its broadest sense. It covers areas from the classic research in economic history, economic thought, economic theory, and management science to emerging research fields such as economic sociology, bio-economics, evolutionary game theory, agent-based modeling, complex systems study, econo-physics, experimental economics, and so on. EIER follows the belief that a truly interdisciplinary discussion is needed to propel the investigation in the dynamic process of socio-economic change where institutions as emergent outcomes of human actions do matter. Although EIER is an official journal of the Japan Association for Evolutionary Economics, it welcomes non-members'' contributions from all parts of the world. All the contributions are refereed under strict scientific criteria, although EIER does not apply monolithic formalistic measure to them. Evolution goes hand in hand with diversities; this is also the spirit of EIER. Focus areas of the Review (not exhaustive): - Foundations of institutional and evolutionary economics - Criticism of mainstream views in the social sciences - Knowledge and learning in socio-economic life - Development and innovation of technologies - Transformation of industrial organizations and economic systems - Experimental studies in economics - Agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems - Evolution of the governance structure of firms and other organizations - Comparison of dynamically changing institutions of the world - Policy proposals in the transformational process of economic life