Dorsal root ganglia atrophy and serum biomarkers supporting the diagnosis of chronic postsurgical inguinal pain

Eva Herrmann, Magnus Schindehuette, Gudrun Kindl, Ann-Kristin Reinhold, Felix Aulbach, Norman Rose, Johannes Dreiling, Daniel Schwarzkopf, Michael Meir, Yujing Jin, Karolin Teichmueller, Anna Widder, Robert Blum, Abdelrahman Sawalma, Nadine Cebulla, Michael Sendtner, Winfried Meissner, Alexander Brack, Mirko Pham, Claudia Sommer, Nicolas Schlegel, Heike L Rittner
{"title":"Dorsal root ganglia atrophy and serum biomarkers supporting the diagnosis of chronic postsurgical inguinal pain","authors":"Eva Herrmann, Magnus Schindehuette, Gudrun Kindl, Ann-Kristin Reinhold, Felix Aulbach, Norman Rose, Johannes Dreiling, Daniel Schwarzkopf, Michael Meir, Yujing Jin, Karolin Teichmueller, Anna Widder, Robert Blum, Abdelrahman Sawalma, Nadine Cebulla, Michael Sendtner, Winfried Meissner, Alexander Brack, Mirko Pham, Claudia Sommer, Nicolas Schlegel, Heike L Rittner","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.18.24309141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic postsurgical inguinal pain (CPIP) is the most common complication of groin hernia surgery. The characteristics of patients, their medical care, and choice of the best diagnostic tools remain to be defined to optimize preventive and therapeutic interventions. Methods: Claims data from 2018 and a 1-year follow-up were analysed and deep phenotyping including sensory testing, blood and skin biopsies, MRI imaging of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), and patient-reported outcomes were used to define normative values, as well as incidence, medical care, and pathophysiological factors. Results: 11,221 patients with hernia surgery in 2018 were identified; 8.5% had pain before which was relieved by surgery, but a similar percentage had novel groin pain. Deep phenotyping of 141 healthy controls provided a map of the inguinal sensory system. CPIP patients suffered from moderate pain with neuropathic features, individual sensory abnormalities, and unilateral L1 DRG atrophy. In the blood, C-C-motif chemokine ligand (CCL2) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were upregulated while apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) was reduced. A cluster of DRG atrophy, BDNF, ApoA1 and anxiety correlated best with the diagnosis. CPIP patients with novel pain had significantly more DRG atrophy (-22% ipsi vs. contra). Conclusion: CPIP is relevant and often newly acquired after surgery. A combination of DRG imaging, serum markers, and anxiety screening can support the diagnosis. Using this core set of markers could guide surgeons towards more personalized therapies and possible preventive intraoperative techniques.\nTrial registration: German Trial Registry DRKS00024588 and DRKS00016790","PeriodicalId":501393,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.18.24309141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic postsurgical inguinal pain (CPIP) is the most common complication of groin hernia surgery. The characteristics of patients, their medical care, and choice of the best diagnostic tools remain to be defined to optimize preventive and therapeutic interventions. Methods: Claims data from 2018 and a 1-year follow-up were analysed and deep phenotyping including sensory testing, blood and skin biopsies, MRI imaging of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), and patient-reported outcomes were used to define normative values, as well as incidence, medical care, and pathophysiological factors. Results: 11,221 patients with hernia surgery in 2018 were identified; 8.5% had pain before which was relieved by surgery, but a similar percentage had novel groin pain. Deep phenotyping of 141 healthy controls provided a map of the inguinal sensory system. CPIP patients suffered from moderate pain with neuropathic features, individual sensory abnormalities, and unilateral L1 DRG atrophy. In the blood, C-C-motif chemokine ligand (CCL2) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were upregulated while apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) was reduced. A cluster of DRG atrophy, BDNF, ApoA1 and anxiety correlated best with the diagnosis. CPIP patients with novel pain had significantly more DRG atrophy (-22% ipsi vs. contra). Conclusion: CPIP is relevant and often newly acquired after surgery. A combination of DRG imaging, serum markers, and anxiety screening can support the diagnosis. Using this core set of markers could guide surgeons towards more personalized therapies and possible preventive intraoperative techniques. Trial registration: German Trial Registry DRKS00024588 and DRKS00016790
背根神经节萎缩和血清生物标志物支持手术后腹股沟慢性疼痛的诊断
背景:手术后腹股沟慢性疼痛(CPIP)是腹股沟疝手术最常见的并发症。患者的特征、医疗护理和最佳诊断工具的选择仍有待明确,以优化预防和治疗干预措施。方法:分析了 2018 年的理赔数据和 1 年的随访数据,并使用包括感觉测试、血液和皮肤活检、背根神经节(DRG)核磁共振成像和患者报告结果在内的深度表型来定义规范值,以及发病率、医疗护理和病理生理因素。研究结果确定了2018年接受疝气手术的11221名患者;8.5%的患者在手术前有疼痛,手术后疼痛缓解,但有类似比例的患者有新的腹股沟疼痛。对141名健康对照者进行的深度表型分析提供了腹股沟感觉系统图谱。CPIP 患者有中度疼痛,伴有神经病理性特征、个别感觉异常和单侧 L1 DRG 萎缩。在血液中,C-C-motif趋化因子配体(CCL2)和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)上调,而载脂蛋白A1(ApoA1)降低。DRG萎缩、BDNF、载脂蛋白A1和焦虑与诊断的相关性最好。伴有新发疼痛的 CPIP 患者的 DRG 萎缩程度明显更高(-22% ipsi vs. contra)。结论CPIP 具有相关性,而且往往是术后新患。结合 DRG 成像、血清标记物和焦虑筛查可支持诊断。使用这套核心标志物可以指导外科医生采用更个性化的疗法和可能的术中预防技术:德国试验注册中心 DRKS00024588 和 DRKS00016790
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信