Ecotoxicity of Pesticides Approved for Use in European Conventional or Organic Agriculture for Honeybees, Birds, and Earthworms

Lena Goritschnig, Helmut Burtscher-Schaden, Thomas Durstberger, Johann G. Zaller
{"title":"Ecotoxicity of Pesticides Approved for Use in European Conventional or Organic Agriculture for Honeybees, Birds, and Earthworms","authors":"Lena Goritschnig, Helmut Burtscher-Schaden, Thomas Durstberger, Johann G. Zaller","doi":"10.3390/environments11070137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pesticides affect biota inside and outside agricultural fields due to their intrinsic mode of action. This study investigated whether pesticide active substances (AS) approved for conventional agriculture in Europe differ in their ecotoxicity from AS approved for organic agriculture. The evaluation was based on official ecotoxicological data for surrogate honeybee, bird, and earthworm species, which also serve as a reference for official environmental risk assessments in the pesticide authorization process. In October 2022, 268 chemical-synthetic AS approved for conventional and 179 nature-based AS approved for organic agriculture were listed in the EU Pesticide Database. Ecotoxicological data were only available for 254 AS approved for use in conventional agriculture and 110 AS approved for use in organic agriculture. The results showed a higher ecotoxicity of conventional AS: 79% (201 AS), 64% (163 AS) and 91% (230 AS) were moderately to acutely toxic to honeybees, birds, and earthworms, respectively, compared to 44% (48 AS), 14% (15 AS) and 36% (39 AS) of AS approved for organic agriculture. We have only considered the potential ecotoxicities of individual substances in this assessment; actual exposure in the field, where multiple AS formulations with other chemicals (including impurities) are applied, will be different. Nevertheless, these results emphasize that an increase in organic agriculture in Europe would reduce the ecotoxicological burden on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services.","PeriodicalId":11886,"journal":{"name":"Environments","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pesticides affect biota inside and outside agricultural fields due to their intrinsic mode of action. This study investigated whether pesticide active substances (AS) approved for conventional agriculture in Europe differ in their ecotoxicity from AS approved for organic agriculture. The evaluation was based on official ecotoxicological data for surrogate honeybee, bird, and earthworm species, which also serve as a reference for official environmental risk assessments in the pesticide authorization process. In October 2022, 268 chemical-synthetic AS approved for conventional and 179 nature-based AS approved for organic agriculture were listed in the EU Pesticide Database. Ecotoxicological data were only available for 254 AS approved for use in conventional agriculture and 110 AS approved for use in organic agriculture. The results showed a higher ecotoxicity of conventional AS: 79% (201 AS), 64% (163 AS) and 91% (230 AS) were moderately to acutely toxic to honeybees, birds, and earthworms, respectively, compared to 44% (48 AS), 14% (15 AS) and 36% (39 AS) of AS approved for organic agriculture. We have only considered the potential ecotoxicities of individual substances in this assessment; actual exposure in the field, where multiple AS formulations with other chemicals (including impurities) are applied, will be different. Nevertheless, these results emphasize that an increase in organic agriculture in Europe would reduce the ecotoxicological burden on biodiversity and associated ecosystem services.
获准在欧洲常规或有机农业中使用的杀虫剂对蜜蜂、鸟类和蚯蚓的生态毒性
农药因其固有的作用模式而影响农田内外的生物群。本研究调查了欧洲批准用于常规农业的农药活性物质(AS)与批准用于有机农业的农药活性物质(AS)在生态毒性方面是否存在差异。评估依据的是蜜蜂、鸟类和蚯蚓等替代物种的官方生态毒理学数据,这些数据也可作为农药授权过程中官方环境风险评估的参考。2022 年 10 月,欧盟农药数据库中列出了 268 种获准用于常规农业的化学合成 AS 和 179 种获准用于有机农业的基于自然的 AS。仅有 254 种获准用于常规农业的 AS 和 110 种获准用于有机农业的 AS 的生态毒理学数据。结果显示,常规 AS 的生态毒性较高:79%(201 种 AS)、64%(163 种 AS)和 91%(230 种 AS)的 AS 对蜜蜂、鸟类和蚯蚓有中度至急性毒性,而获准用于有机农业的 AS 的生态毒性分别为 44%(48 种 AS)、14%(15 种 AS)和 36%(39 种 AS)。在本次评估中,我们只考虑了单个物质的潜在生态毒性;在田间应用含有其他化学品(包括杂质)的多种 AS 配方时,实际接触情况会有所不同。尽管如此,这些结果强调,欧洲有机农业的增加将减少对生物多样性和相关生态系统服务的生态毒理学负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信