Complex fault geometry and slip distribution of 2022 Mw 6.6 Menyuan, China, earthquake from joint inversion of GNSS and InSAR observations

IF 1 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qinghua Bao, Xiaoning Su
{"title":"Complex fault geometry and slip distribution of 2022 Mw 6.6 Menyuan, China, earthquake from joint inversion of GNSS and InSAR observations","authors":"Qinghua Bao, Xiaoning Su","doi":"10.1007/s12303-024-0020-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>On January 7, 2022, a Mw 6.6 earthquake occurred in Menyuan County, Qinghai Province, China. To understand the coseismic deformation mechanism of this earthquake, we utilized GNSS and InSAR geodetic observations to obtain the coseismic deformation field and inverted for the slip distributions of different fault models. Through a comparative analysis of the coseismic slip distribution characteristics of different fault models and fitting degree of observations, we proposed the relatively optimal fault model. The coseismic deformation results of two types of observations consistently show a dominant horizontal strike-slip motion for this earthquake. The deformation characteristics of the coseismic LOS displacement profile model, considering the fault dip angle and slip amount, indicate that the coseismic slip is concentrated in the shallow portion, with a maximum slip of 3.29 m at a depth of 1.31 km. The inversion results of the optimal fault model proposed in this study indicate that compared to the surface trace of the Lenglongling fault, the surface trace of the eastern section of the primary fault is deflected by 9.28°, with a length of approximately 14 km, and the western section extends westward approximately 9 km along the Lenglongling fault. In the strike-change area between the Lenglongling fault and the Tuolaishan fault, the secondary fault connects the primary fault and extends westward along the Tuolaishan fault for approximately 8 km. The primary fault corresponds to the Lenglongling fault, with a maximum slip of 4.28 m, and the secondary fault corresponds to the Tuolaishan fault, with a maximum slip of 2.44 m.</p>","PeriodicalId":12659,"journal":{"name":"Geosciences Journal","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-024-0020-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On January 7, 2022, a Mw 6.6 earthquake occurred in Menyuan County, Qinghai Province, China. To understand the coseismic deformation mechanism of this earthquake, we utilized GNSS and InSAR geodetic observations to obtain the coseismic deformation field and inverted for the slip distributions of different fault models. Through a comparative analysis of the coseismic slip distribution characteristics of different fault models and fitting degree of observations, we proposed the relatively optimal fault model. The coseismic deformation results of two types of observations consistently show a dominant horizontal strike-slip motion for this earthquake. The deformation characteristics of the coseismic LOS displacement profile model, considering the fault dip angle and slip amount, indicate that the coseismic slip is concentrated in the shallow portion, with a maximum slip of 3.29 m at a depth of 1.31 km. The inversion results of the optimal fault model proposed in this study indicate that compared to the surface trace of the Lenglongling fault, the surface trace of the eastern section of the primary fault is deflected by 9.28°, with a length of approximately 14 km, and the western section extends westward approximately 9 km along the Lenglongling fault. In the strike-change area between the Lenglongling fault and the Tuolaishan fault, the secondary fault connects the primary fault and extends westward along the Tuolaishan fault for approximately 8 km. The primary fault corresponds to the Lenglongling fault, with a maximum slip of 4.28 m, and the secondary fault corresponds to the Tuolaishan fault, with a maximum slip of 2.44 m.

从 GNSS 和 InSAR 观测数据的联合反演中得出 2022 年中国门源 6.6 级地震的复杂断层几何形状和滑移分布
2022年1月7日,中国青海省门源县发生6.6级地震。为了解此次地震的共震变形机制,我们利用 GNSS 和 InSAR 大地测量观测数据获取了共震变形场,并反演了不同断层模型的滑移分布。通过对比分析不同断层模型的共震滑移分布特征和观测数据的拟合程度,提出了相对最优的断层模型。两类观测资料的共震变形结果一致表明,此次地震的水平走向滑动运动占主导地位。考虑到断层倾角和滑移量,共震 LOS 位移剖面模型的变形特征表明,共震滑移主要集中在浅部,最大滑移量为 3.29 米,位于 1.31 千米深度。本研究提出的最优断层模型的反演结果表明,与冷龙岭断层的地表走向相比,原生断层东段的地表走向偏转了 9.28°,长度约为 14 公里,西段沿冷龙岭断层向西延伸了约 9 公里。在冷龙岭断层与涂来山断层之间的走向变化区,次级断层与初级断层相连,沿涂来山断层向西延伸约 8 公里。原生断层与冷龙岭断层相对应,最大滑移量为 4.28 米,次生断层与涂来山断层相对应,最大滑移量为 2.44 米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geosciences Journal
Geosciences Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Geosciences Journal opens a new era for the publication of geoscientific research articles in English, covering geology, geophysics, geochemistry, paleontology, structural geology, mineralogy, petrology, stratigraphy, sedimentology, environmental geology, economic geology, petroleum geology, hydrogeology, remote sensing and planetary geology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信