Multi-model genome-wide association study on key organic naked barley agronomic, phenological, diseases, and grain quality traits

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Laura Paire, Cathal McCabe, Tomás McCabe
{"title":"Multi-model genome-wide association study on key organic naked barley agronomic, phenological, diseases, and grain quality traits","authors":"Laura Paire, Cathal McCabe, Tomás McCabe","doi":"10.1007/s10681-024-03374-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study objective was to assess the potential benefits of using genomic tools in organic plant breeding programs to enhance selection efficiency. A diversity panel of 247 spring naked barley accessions was characterized under Irish organic conditions over 3 years. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed on 19 traits related to agronomy, phenology, diseases, and grain quality, using the information on 50 K Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP). Four models (EMMA, G model, BLINK, 3VMrMLM) were applied to 5 types of Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUP): within-year, mean, aggregated within-year). 1653 Marker-Trait-Associations (MTA) were identified, with 259 discovered in at least two analyses. 3VMrMLM was the best-performing model with significant MTA together explaining the largest proportion of the additive variance for most traits and BLUP types (from 1.4 to 50%). This study proposed a methodology to prioritize main effect MTA from different models’ outputs, using multi-marker regression analyses with markers fitted as fixed or random factors. 36 QTL, considered major, explained more than 5% of the trait variance on each BLUP type. A candidate gene or known QTL was found for 18 of them, with 13 discovered with 3VMrMLM. Multi-model GWAS was useful for validating additional QTL, including 8 only discovered with BLINK or G model, thus allowing a broader understanding of the traits’ genetic architecture. In addition, results highlighted a correlation between the trait value and the number of favorable major QTL exhibited by accessions. We suggest inputting this number in a multi-trait index for a more efficient Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) of accessions best balancing multiple quantitative traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":11803,"journal":{"name":"Euphytica","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euphytica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03374-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study objective was to assess the potential benefits of using genomic tools in organic plant breeding programs to enhance selection efficiency. A diversity panel of 247 spring naked barley accessions was characterized under Irish organic conditions over 3 years. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed on 19 traits related to agronomy, phenology, diseases, and grain quality, using the information on 50 K Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP). Four models (EMMA, G model, BLINK, 3VMrMLM) were applied to 5 types of Best Linear Unbiased Predictors (BLUP): within-year, mean, aggregated within-year). 1653 Marker-Trait-Associations (MTA) were identified, with 259 discovered in at least two analyses. 3VMrMLM was the best-performing model with significant MTA together explaining the largest proportion of the additive variance for most traits and BLUP types (from 1.4 to 50%). This study proposed a methodology to prioritize main effect MTA from different models’ outputs, using multi-marker regression analyses with markers fitted as fixed or random factors. 36 QTL, considered major, explained more than 5% of the trait variance on each BLUP type. A candidate gene or known QTL was found for 18 of them, with 13 discovered with 3VMrMLM. Multi-model GWAS was useful for validating additional QTL, including 8 only discovered with BLINK or G model, thus allowing a broader understanding of the traits’ genetic architecture. In addition, results highlighted a correlation between the trait value and the number of favorable major QTL exhibited by accessions. We suggest inputting this number in a multi-trait index for a more efficient Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) of accessions best balancing multiple quantitative traits.

Abstract Image

有机裸麦主要农艺、物候、疾病和谷物品质性状的多模型全基因组关联研究
研究目的是评估在有机植物育种计划中使用基因组工具提高选育效率的潜在益处。在爱尔兰的有机条件下,对一个由 247 个春裸大麦品种组成的多样性小组进行了为期 3 年的特征研究。利用 50 K 个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)信息,对与农艺、物候、疾病和谷物品质相关的 19 个性状进行了全基因组关联研究(GWAS)。四种模型(EMMA、G 模型、BLINK、3VMrMLM)适用于 5 种最佳线性无偏预测因子(BLUP):年内、平均、年内聚合)。确定了 1653 个标记-特征关联(MTA),其中 259 个在至少两次分析中被发现。3VMrMLM 是表现最好的模型,其显著的 MTA 共同解释了大多数性状和 BLUP 类型的最大比例的加性变异(从 1.4 到 50%)。这项研究提出了一种方法,利用多标记回归分析,将标记作为固定或随机因素拟合,从不同模型的输出结果中优先考虑主效应 MTA。36 个 QTL 被认为是主要的,解释了每个 BLUP 类型 5%以上的性状变异。其中 18 个找到了候选基因或已知 QTL,13 个是用 3VMrMLM 发现的。多模型 GWAS 有助于验证其他 QTL,包括 8 个仅用 BLINK 或 G 模型发现的 QTL,从而更广泛地了解性状的遗传结构。此外,研究结果凸显了性状值与加入的有利主要 QTL 数量之间的相关性。我们建议将这一数字输入多性状指数,以便更有效地进行标记辅助选择(MAS)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Euphytica
Euphytica 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Euphytica is an international journal on theoretical and applied aspects of plant breeding. It publishes critical reviews and papers on the results of original research related to plant breeding. The integration of modern and traditional plant breeding is a growing field of research using transgenic crop plants and/or marker assisted breeding in combination with traditional breeding tools. The content should cover the interests of researchers directly or indirectly involved in plant breeding, at universities, breeding institutes, seed industries, plant biotech companies and industries using plant raw materials, and promote stability, adaptability and sustainability in agriculture and agro-industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信