Theoretical and computational models for Saturn’s co-orbiting moons, Janus and Epimetheus

Sean O’Neill, Katrina Hay, Justin deMattos
{"title":"Theoretical and computational models for Saturn’s co-orbiting moons, Janus and Epimetheus","authors":"Sean O’Neill, Katrina Hay, Justin deMattos","doi":"10.1007/s10569-024-10200-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two moons of Saturn, Janus and Epimetheus, are in co-orbital motion, exchanging orbits approximately every four Earth years as the inner moon approaches the outer moon and they gravitationally interact. The orbital radii of these moons differ by only 50 km (less than the moons’ mean physical radii), and it is this slight difference in their orbits that enables their periodic exchanges. Numerical <i>n</i>-body simulations can accurately model these exchanges using only Newtonian physics acting upon three objects: Saturn, Janus, and Epimetheus. Here we present analytical approaches and solutions, and corresponding computer simulations, designed to explore the effects of the initial orbital radius difference on otherwise similar co-orbital systems. Comparison with our simulation results illustrates that our analytic expressions provide very accurate predictions for the moon separations at closest approach and simulated post-exchange orbital radii. Our analytic estimates of the exchange period also match the simulated value for Janus and Epimetheus to within a few percent, although systems with smaller differences in their orbital radii are less well-modeled by our simple approach, suggesting that either full simulations or more sophisticated analytic approaches would be required to estimate exchange periods in those cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":72537,"journal":{"name":"Celestial mechanics and dynamical astronomy","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Celestial mechanics and dynamical astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-024-10200-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two moons of Saturn, Janus and Epimetheus, are in co-orbital motion, exchanging orbits approximately every four Earth years as the inner moon approaches the outer moon and they gravitationally interact. The orbital radii of these moons differ by only 50 km (less than the moons’ mean physical radii), and it is this slight difference in their orbits that enables their periodic exchanges. Numerical n-body simulations can accurately model these exchanges using only Newtonian physics acting upon three objects: Saturn, Janus, and Epimetheus. Here we present analytical approaches and solutions, and corresponding computer simulations, designed to explore the effects of the initial orbital radius difference on otherwise similar co-orbital systems. Comparison with our simulation results illustrates that our analytic expressions provide very accurate predictions for the moon separations at closest approach and simulated post-exchange orbital radii. Our analytic estimates of the exchange period also match the simulated value for Janus and Epimetheus to within a few percent, although systems with smaller differences in their orbital radii are less well-modeled by our simple approach, suggesting that either full simulations or more sophisticated analytic approaches would be required to estimate exchange periods in those cases.

Abstract Image

土星同轨卫星 Janus 和 Epimetheus 的理论和计算模型
土星的两颗卫星杰纳斯(Janus)和厄庇米修斯(Epimetheus)处于同轨运动状态,大约每四个地球年交换一次轨道,因为内侧卫星接近外侧卫星,它们会发生引力相互作用。这两颗卫星的轨道半径仅相差 50 千米(小于卫星的平均物理半径),正是它们轨道上的这一微小差异使得它们能够进行周期性的轨道交换。数值 n-body 模拟只需使用作用于三个物体的牛顿物理学原理,就能精确地模拟这些交换:土星、雅努斯和埃皮米修斯。在此,我们提出了分析方法和解决方案以及相应的计算机模拟,旨在探索初始轨道半径差异对其他类似共轨系统的影响。与模拟结果的比较表明,我们的分析表达式对最接近时的卫星距离和模拟的交换后轨道半径提供了非常准确的预测。我们对交换周期的分析估计值也与雅努斯和埃皮米修斯的模拟值相吻合,误差在百分之几以内,尽管我们的简单方法对轨道半径差异较小的系统的模拟效果较差,这表明在这些情况下需要进行全面模拟或采用更复杂的分析方法来估计交换周期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信