Awake prone positioning effectiveness in moderate to severe COVID-19 a randomized controlled trial.

Phong Nguyen Thanh, Duc Hong Du, Ho Bich Hai, Nguyen Thanh Nguyen, Le Dinh Van Khoa, Le Thuy Thuy Khanh, Luu Hoai Bao Tran, Nguyen Thi My Linh, Cao Thi Cam Van, Dang Phuong Thao, Nguyen Thi Diem Trinh, Pham Tieu Kieu, Nguyen Thanh Truong, Vo Tan Hoang, Nguyen Thanh Ngoc, Tran Thi Dong Vien, Vo Trieu Ly, Tran Dang Khoa, Abi Beane, James T Anibal, Guy Thwaites, Ronald B Geskus, David Clifton, Nguyen Thi Phuong Dung, Evelyne Kestelyn, Guy Glover, Le Van Tan, Lam Minh Yen, Nguyen Le Nhu Tung, Nguyen Thanh Dung, C. Louise Thwaites
{"title":"Awake prone positioning effectiveness in moderate to severe COVID-19 a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Phong Nguyen Thanh, Duc Hong Du, Ho Bich Hai, Nguyen Thanh Nguyen, Le Dinh Van Khoa, Le Thuy Thuy Khanh, Luu Hoai Bao Tran, Nguyen Thi My Linh, Cao Thi Cam Van, Dang Phuong Thao, Nguyen Thi Diem Trinh, Pham Tieu Kieu, Nguyen Thanh Truong, Vo Tan Hoang, Nguyen Thanh Ngoc, Tran Thi Dong Vien, Vo Trieu Ly, Tran Dang Khoa, Abi Beane, James T Anibal, Guy Thwaites, Ronald B Geskus, David Clifton, Nguyen Thi Phuong Dung, Evelyne Kestelyn, Guy Glover, Le Van Tan, Lam Minh Yen, Nguyen Le Nhu Tung, Nguyen Thanh Dung, C. Louise Thwaites","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.30.24309722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of awake-prone positioning (APP) in a randomised controlled trial, using a dedicated APP implementation team and wearable continuous-monitoring devices to monitor position and oximetry.\nMethods: The trial was performed at a tertiary level hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, recruiting adults (≥18 years) hospitalised with moderate or severe COVID-19 and receiving supplemental oxygen therapy via nasal/facemask systems or high-flow nasal canulae. Participants were randomized (1:1) to standard care or APP. The primary outcome was escalation of respiratory support within 28 days of randomisation.\nResults: Ninety-three patients were enrolled between March 2022 and March 2023; 80 (86%) had received ≥2 doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Significantly greater mean daily APP times were achieved in those allocated to APP, although most did not achieve the target 8 hours/day. We did not detect significant differences in the primary outcome (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.40-1.78, p=0.67) or secondary outcomes, including intubation rate and 28-day mortality. Particpants reported prone positioning was comfortable, although almost all preferred supine positioning. No adverse events associated with the intervention were reported.\nConclusions: APP was not associated with benefit, but was safe. Continuous monitoring with wearable devices was feasible and acceptable to patients.","PeriodicalId":501249,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.30.24309722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of awake-prone positioning (APP) in a randomised controlled trial, using a dedicated APP implementation team and wearable continuous-monitoring devices to monitor position and oximetry. Methods: The trial was performed at a tertiary level hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, recruiting adults (≥18 years) hospitalised with moderate or severe COVID-19 and receiving supplemental oxygen therapy via nasal/facemask systems or high-flow nasal canulae. Participants were randomized (1:1) to standard care or APP. The primary outcome was escalation of respiratory support within 28 days of randomisation. Results: Ninety-three patients were enrolled between March 2022 and March 2023; 80 (86%) had received ≥2 doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Significantly greater mean daily APP times were achieved in those allocated to APP, although most did not achieve the target 8 hours/day. We did not detect significant differences in the primary outcome (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.40-1.78, p=0.67) or secondary outcomes, including intubation rate and 28-day mortality. Particpants reported prone positioning was comfortable, although almost all preferred supine positioning. No adverse events associated with the intervention were reported. Conclusions: APP was not associated with benefit, but was safe. Continuous monitoring with wearable devices was feasible and acceptable to patients.
清醒俯卧位对中重度 COVID-19 的有效性随机对照试验。
目的:我们在一项随机对照试验中评估了清醒体位疗法(APP)的疗效和可接受性,该疗法使用专门的 APP 实施团队和可穿戴式连续监测设备来监测体位和血氧饱和度:试验在越南胡志明市的一家三级甲等医院进行,招募患有中度或重度 COVID-19 并通过鼻/面罩系统或高流量鼻导管接受补充氧治疗的成人(≥18 岁)。参与者被随机(1:1)分配到标准护理或 APP。主要结果是随机分配后28天内呼吸支持的升级:93名患者于2022年3月至2023年3月期间入组,其中80人(86%)接种了≥2剂SARS-CoV2疫苗。被分配到 APP 的患者平均每日 APP 时间显著增加,尽管大多数患者没有达到每天 8 小时的目标。我们没有发现主要结果(RR 0.85,95% CI 0.40-1.78,p=0.67)或次要结果(包括插管率和 28 天死亡率)有明显差异。参与者表示俯卧位很舒适,但几乎所有人都更喜欢仰卧位。没有与干预相关的不良事件报告:结论:APP 与获益无关,但很安全。使用可穿戴设备进行连续监测是可行的,患者也能接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信