How the experiences of implementation support recipients contribute to implementation outcomes.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-06-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1323807
Allison J Metz, Todd M Jensen, Jenny L Afkinich, Mackensie E Disbennett, Amanda B Farley
{"title":"How the experiences of implementation support recipients contribute to implementation outcomes.","authors":"Allison J Metz, Todd M Jensen, Jenny L Afkinich, Mackensie E Disbennett, Amanda B Farley","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1323807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a growing body of literature on the activities and competencies of implementation support practitioners (ISPs) and the outcomes of engaging ISPs to support implementation efforts. However, there remains limited knowledge about the experiences of implementation support recipients who engage with ISPs and how these experiences shape the trajectory of implementation and contribute to implementation outcomes. This study aimed to extend the research on ISPs by describing the experiences of professionals who received implementation support and inform our understanding of the mechanisms by which ISPs produce behavior change and contribute to implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen individuals with roles in supporting implementation efforts at a private foundation participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using <i>qualitative narrative analysis</i> and <i>episode profile analysis</i> approaches. Iterative diagramming was used to visualize the pathway of experiences of implementation support recipients evidenced by the interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of recipients described how positive experiences and trusting relationships with ISPs increased acceptance of implementation science throughout the foundation and increased the perception of implementation science as both an appropriate and feasible approach for strengthening the impact of foundation strategies. As perceptions of appropriateness and feasibility increased, recipients of implementation support described increasing knowledge and application of implementation science in their funding engagements and internal foundation strategies. Finally, recipients reported that the application of implementation science across the foundation led to sustained implementation capacity and better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The experiences of implementation support recipients described in this paper provide a source for further understanding the mechanisms of change for delivering effective implementation support leading to better implementation quality. Insights from these experiences can enhance our understanding for building implementation capacity and the rationales for evolving approaches that emphasize the dynamic, emotional, and highly relational nature of supporting others to use evidence in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1323807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1323807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a growing body of literature on the activities and competencies of implementation support practitioners (ISPs) and the outcomes of engaging ISPs to support implementation efforts. However, there remains limited knowledge about the experiences of implementation support recipients who engage with ISPs and how these experiences shape the trajectory of implementation and contribute to implementation outcomes. This study aimed to extend the research on ISPs by describing the experiences of professionals who received implementation support and inform our understanding of the mechanisms by which ISPs produce behavior change and contribute to implementation outcomes.

Methods: Thirteen individuals with roles in supporting implementation efforts at a private foundation participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using qualitative narrative analysis and episode profile analysis approaches. Iterative diagramming was used to visualize the pathway of experiences of implementation support recipients evidenced by the interview data.

Results: The majority of recipients described how positive experiences and trusting relationships with ISPs increased acceptance of implementation science throughout the foundation and increased the perception of implementation science as both an appropriate and feasible approach for strengthening the impact of foundation strategies. As perceptions of appropriateness and feasibility increased, recipients of implementation support described increasing knowledge and application of implementation science in their funding engagements and internal foundation strategies. Finally, recipients reported that the application of implementation science across the foundation led to sustained implementation capacity and better outcomes.

Discussion: The experiences of implementation support recipients described in this paper provide a source for further understanding the mechanisms of change for delivering effective implementation support leading to better implementation quality. Insights from these experiences can enhance our understanding for building implementation capacity and the rationales for evolving approaches that emphasize the dynamic, emotional, and highly relational nature of supporting others to use evidence in practice.

执行支助接受者的经验如何促进执行成果。
导言:关于实施支持从业人员(ISPs)的活动和能力以及让 ISPs 参与支持实施工作的结果的文献越来越多。然而,关于实施支持受助者与实施支持从业者合作的经历,以及这些经历如何影响实施轨迹和促进实施成果的了解仍然有限。本研究旨在通过描述接受实施支持的专业人员的经历来扩展对综合服务计划的研究,并让我们了解综合服务计划产生行为改变和促进实施结果的机制:方法: 一家私人基金会的 13 名实施支持人员参加了半结构化访谈。采用定性叙事分析和情节剖析方法对数据进行了分析。采用迭代图表法将访谈数据所证明的实施支持受助者的经历路径可视化:结果:大多数受助者都描述了与综合服务提供者之间的积极经验和信任关系是如何提高整个基金会对实施科学的接受度,以及如何提高对实施科学的认知度,将其视为加强基金会战略影响的一种既合适又可行的方法。随着对适宜性和可行性的认识的提高,实施支持的受援者也越来越了解实施科学,并将其应用到他们的资助活动和基金会的内部战略中。最后,受助者报告说,在整个基金会中应用实施科学能够保持实施能力,并取得更好的成果:本文所描述的实施支持受助者的经验为进一步了解提供有效实施支持以提高实施质量的变革机制提供了来源。从这些经验中获得的启示可以加深我们对建设实施能力的理解,并为强调支持他人在实践中使用证据的动态、情感和高度关系性的方法提供理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信