Comparing the Effectiveness of Afatinib and Osimertinib for Patients With PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Carcinoma.

Cancer diagnosis & prognosis Pub Date : 2024-07-03 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.21873/cdp.10357
Minehiko Inomata, Yosuke Kawashima, Ryota Saito, Daisuke Morinaga, Hitomi Nogawa, Masamichi Sato, Yohei Suzuki, Satoru Yanagisawa, Takashi Kikuchi, Daisuke Jingu, Naruo Yoshimura, Toshiyuki Harada, Eisaku Miyauchi
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of Afatinib and Osimertinib for Patients With PD-L1-positive <i>EGFR</i>-mutant Non-small Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Minehiko Inomata, Yosuke Kawashima, Ryota Saito, Daisuke Morinaga, Hitomi Nogawa, Masamichi Sato, Yohei Suzuki, Satoru Yanagisawa, Takashi Kikuchi, Daisuke Jingu, Naruo Yoshimura, Toshiyuki Harada, Eisaku Miyauchi","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, higher tumor programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, and information on the comparison between afatinib and osimertinib in PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC is scarce.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC to compare the effectiveness of afatinib and osimertinib.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 patients were included in the study. The Cox proportion hazard model was adjusted for age, sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and brain metastasis, revealing that there was no significant difference in risk for progression [hazard ratio (HR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-1.53] or death (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54-1.73) between afatinib and osimertinib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration and overall survival after the treatment with afatinib or osimertinib were similar in patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the present study.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11215441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, higher tumor programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with a poor response to EGFR-TKIs, and information on the comparison between afatinib and osimertinib in PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC is scarce.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC to compare the effectiveness of afatinib and osimertinib.

Results: A total of 177 patients were included in the study. The Cox proportion hazard model was adjusted for age, sex, performance status, EGFR mutation status, PD-L1 expression level, and brain metastasis, revealing that there was no significant difference in risk for progression [hazard ratio (HR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-1.53] or death (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54-1.73) between afatinib and osimertinib.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration and overall survival after the treatment with afatinib or osimertinib were similar in patients with PD-L1-positive EGFR-mutant NSCLC in the present study.

比较阿法替尼和奥希替尼对PD-L1阳性表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞癌患者的疗效
背景/目的:表皮生长因子受体-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)可有效治疗表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。然而,肿瘤程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)的高表达与对EGFR-TKIs的不良反应有关,而阿法替尼和奥希替尼在PD-L1阳性的EGFR突变NSCLC中的对比资料很少:我们回顾性分析了PD-L1阳性EGFR突变NSCLC患者的数据,以比较阿法替尼和奥希替尼的疗效:研究共纳入177例患者。阿法替尼与奥希替尼的进展风险[危险比(HR)=0.99,95%置信区间(CI)=0.64-1.53]或死亡风险(HR=0.96,95% CI=0.54-1.73)无显著差异:总之,在本研究中,PD-L1阳性EGFR突变NSCLC患者接受阿法替尼或奥希替尼治疗后的EGFR-TKI治疗时间和总生存期相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信