Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2024.3023
Erik Cattrysse, Jona Van den Broeck, Robin Petroons, Amber Teugels, Aldo Scafoglieri, Emiel van Trijffel
{"title":"Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective.","authors":"Erik Cattrysse, Jona Van den Broeck, Robin Petroons, Amber Teugels, Aldo Scafoglieri, Emiel van Trijffel","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Worldwide many countries provide direct access in physiotherapy. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy from different perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted in three databases up to September 2022. Studies were included when regarding assessment of at least one of the following perspectives: patient (quality of Life, patient satisfaction, pain, functioning, adverse events), provider (treatment compliance, responsibility, liability, status, prestige, job satisfaction), and society (number of referrals, amount of medical imaging, medication use, number of sessions needed for rehabilitation, and overall costs and cost-effectiveness). Selection and methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews were performed. Data extraction and analysis were performed separately for systematic reviews and individual primary studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five systematic reviews as well as 17 primary studies were included. From a patient perspective, no significant effect of direct access was found for pain and a tendency in favour of direct access was found for quality of life, functioning, and well-being. Concerning providers, higher treatment compliance was found in direct access to physiotherapy and decision-making was more accurate. From a societal perspective, significant differences in favour of direct access physiotherapy were found for waiting time, prescribed medication, and medical imaging. In addition, there was a tendency towards lower health care costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that direct access physiotherapy could provide at least equal quality of care for patients and better opportunities for providers and the society on selected outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Worldwide many countries provide direct access in physiotherapy. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy from different perspectives.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in three databases up to September 2022. Studies were included when regarding assessment of at least one of the following perspectives: patient (quality of Life, patient satisfaction, pain, functioning, adverse events), provider (treatment compliance, responsibility, liability, status, prestige, job satisfaction), and society (number of referrals, amount of medical imaging, medication use, number of sessions needed for rehabilitation, and overall costs and cost-effectiveness). Selection and methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews were performed. Data extraction and analysis were performed separately for systematic reviews and individual primary studies.

Results: Five systematic reviews as well as 17 primary studies were included. From a patient perspective, no significant effect of direct access was found for pain and a tendency in favour of direct access was found for quality of life, functioning, and well-being. Concerning providers, higher treatment compliance was found in direct access to physiotherapy and decision-making was more accurate. From a societal perspective, significant differences in favour of direct access physiotherapy were found for waiting time, prescribed medication, and medical imaging. In addition, there was a tendency towards lower health care costs.

Conclusions: Emerging evidence suggests that direct access physiotherapy could provide at least equal quality of care for patients and better opportunities for providers and the society on selected outcomes.

直接就医对基层医疗机构肌肉骨骼物理治疗质量的影响:从患者、医疗机构和社会角度进行的范围界定综述。
简介在世界范围内,许多国家都提供直接物理治疗服务。本范围综述旨在从不同角度综合现有的有关基层医疗机构肌肉骨骼物理治疗质量的证据:截至 2022 年 9 月,在三个数据库中进行了系统检索。如果研究涉及以下至少一个角度的评估,则纳入研究:患者(生活质量、患者满意度、疼痛、功能、不良事件)、提供者(治疗依从性、责任、义务、地位、声望、工作满意度)和社会(转诊次数、医学影像检查数量、药物使用、康复所需疗程次数、总体成本和成本效益)。对系统综述进行了筛选和方法学质量评估。对系统综述和单项主要研究分别进行了数据提取和分析:结果:共纳入了 5 篇系统综述和 17 项主要研究。从患者的角度来看,直接就医对疼痛没有明显影响,而在生活质量、功能和幸福感方面,直接就医更有优势。就提供者而言,直接接受物理治疗的患者治疗依从性更高,决策也更准确。从社会角度来看,在等待时间、处方药物和医学影像方面,直接获得物理治疗的患者与直接获得物理治疗的患者存在显著差异。此外,医疗费用也呈下降趋势:新的证据表明,直接获得物理治疗至少可以为患者提供同等质量的医疗服务,并为医疗服务提供者和社会提供更好的选择机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信