Insights into the pathophysiology and response of persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 to spinal cord stimulation: a human genome-wide association study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gustavo Fabregat-Cid, David L Cedeno, José De Andrés, Anushik Harutyunyan, Vicente Monsalve-Dolz, Ana Mínguez-Martí, Natalia Escrivá-Matoses, Juan Marcos Asensio-Samper, Thiago Carnaval, Jesús Villoria, Raquel Rodríguez-López, Ricardo Vallejo
{"title":"Insights into the pathophysiology and response of persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 to spinal cord stimulation: a human genome-wide association study.","authors":"Gustavo Fabregat-Cid, David L Cedeno, José De Andrés, Anushik Harutyunyan, Vicente Monsalve-Dolz, Ana Mínguez-Martí, Natalia Escrivá-Matoses, Juan Marcos Asensio-Samper, Thiago Carnaval, Jesús Villoria, Raquel Rodríguez-López, Ricardo Vallejo","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides pain relief for some patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS 2), but the precise mechanisms of action and prognostic factors for a favorable pain response remain obscure. This in vivo human genome-wide association study provides some pathophysiological clues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis of serum obtained from both PSPS 2 cases and pain-free controls who had undergone lower back spinal surgery at the study site. Using multivariate discriminant analysis, we tried to identify different expressions between mRNA transcripts from PSPS 2 patients relative to controls, SCS responders to non-responders, or SCS responders to themselves before starting SCS. Gene ontology enrichment analysis was used to identify the biological processes that best discriminate between the groups of clinical interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty PSPS 2 patients, of whom 23 responded to SCS, were evaluated together with 15 pain-free controls. We identified 11 significantly downregulated genes in serum of PSPS 2 patients compared with pain-free controls and two significantly downregulated genes once the SCS response became apparent. All were suggestive of enhanced inflammation, tissue repair mechanisms and proliferative responses among the former. We could not identify any gene differentiating patients who responded to SCS from those who did not respond.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study points out various biological processes that may underlie PSPS 2 pain and SCS therapeutic effects, including the modulation of neuroimmune response, inflammation and restorative processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides pain relief for some patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS 2), but the precise mechanisms of action and prognostic factors for a favorable pain response remain obscure. This in vivo human genome-wide association study provides some pathophysiological clues.

Methods: We performed a high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis of serum obtained from both PSPS 2 cases and pain-free controls who had undergone lower back spinal surgery at the study site. Using multivariate discriminant analysis, we tried to identify different expressions between mRNA transcripts from PSPS 2 patients relative to controls, SCS responders to non-responders, or SCS responders to themselves before starting SCS. Gene ontology enrichment analysis was used to identify the biological processes that best discriminate between the groups of clinical interest.

Results: Thirty PSPS 2 patients, of whom 23 responded to SCS, were evaluated together with 15 pain-free controls. We identified 11 significantly downregulated genes in serum of PSPS 2 patients compared with pain-free controls and two significantly downregulated genes once the SCS response became apparent. All were suggestive of enhanced inflammation, tissue repair mechanisms and proliferative responses among the former. We could not identify any gene differentiating patients who responded to SCS from those who did not respond.

Conclusions: This study points out various biological processes that may underlie PSPS 2 pain and SCS therapeutic effects, including the modulation of neuroimmune response, inflammation and restorative processes.

持续性脊柱痛综合征 2 型的病理生理学及其对脊髓刺激的反应:人类全基因组关联研究。
背景:脊髓刺激(SCS)可缓解部分顽固性脊柱疼痛综合征 2 型(PSPS 2)患者的疼痛,但其确切的作用机制和有利疼痛反应的预后因素仍不明确。这项体内人类全基因组关联研究提供了一些病理生理学线索:我们对 PSPS 2 病例和无痛对照组的血清进行了高密度寡核苷酸芯片分析,这些病例都在研究地点接受了下背部脊柱手术。通过多变量判别分析,我们试图找出 PSPS 2 患者与对照组、SCS 反应者与非反应者或 SCS 反应者与开始 SCS 前自身的 mRNA 转录物之间的不同表达。基因本体富集分析用于确定最能区分临床相关群体的生物过程:对 30 例 PSPS 2 患者(其中 23 例对 SCS 有反应)和 15 例无疼痛对照组进行了评估。与无痛对照组相比,我们在 PSPS 2 患者的血清中发现了 11 个明显下调的基因,一旦 SCS 反应明显,又发现了两个明显下调的基因。所有这些都表明前者的炎症、组织修复机制和增殖反应增强。我们无法发现任何基因能将对 SCS 有反应的患者与没有反应的患者区分开来:本研究指出了 PSPS 2 疼痛和 SCS 治疗效果的各种生物学过程,包括神经免疫反应、炎症和修复过程的调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信