Risk factors for prediabetes in community-dwelling adults: A generalized estimating equation logistic regression approach with natural language processing insights.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1002/nur.22413
Aeri Kim, Eunjoo Jeon, Hana Lee, Hyunsook Heo, Kyungmi Woo
{"title":"Risk factors for prediabetes in community-dwelling adults: A generalized estimating equation logistic regression approach with natural language processing insights.","authors":"Aeri Kim, Eunjoo Jeon, Hana Lee, Hyunsook Heo, Kyungmi Woo","doi":"10.1002/nur.22413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global prevalence of prediabetes is expected to reach 8.3% (587 million people) by 2045, with 70% of people with prediabetes developing diabetes during their lifetimes. We aimed to classify community-dwelling adults with a high risk for prediabetes based on prediabetes-related symptoms and to identify their characteristics, which might be factors associated with prediabetes. We analyzed homecare nursing records (n = 26,840) of 1628 patients aged over 20 years. Using a natural language processing algorithm, we classified each nursing episode as either low-risk or high-risk for prediabetes based on the detected number and category of prediabetes-symptom words. To identify differences between the risk groups, we employed t-tests, chi-square tests, and data visualization. Risk factors for prediabetes were identified using multiple logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations. A total of 3270 episodes (12.18%) were classified as potentially high-risk for prediabetes. There were significant differences in the personal, social, and clinical factors between groups. Results revealed that female sex, age, cancer coverage as part of homecare insurance coverage, and family caregivers were significantly associated with an increased risk of prediabetes. Although prediabetes is not a life-threatening disease, uncontrolled blood glucose can cause unfavorable outcomes for other major diseases. Thus, medical professionals should consider the associated symptoms and risk factors of prediabetes. Moreover, the proposed algorithm may support the detection of individuals at a high risk for prediabetes. Implementing this approach could facilitate proactive monitoring and early intervention, leading to reduced healthcare expenses and better health outcomes for community-dwelling adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"620-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global prevalence of prediabetes is expected to reach 8.3% (587 million people) by 2045, with 70% of people with prediabetes developing diabetes during their lifetimes. We aimed to classify community-dwelling adults with a high risk for prediabetes based on prediabetes-related symptoms and to identify their characteristics, which might be factors associated with prediabetes. We analyzed homecare nursing records (n = 26,840) of 1628 patients aged over 20 years. Using a natural language processing algorithm, we classified each nursing episode as either low-risk or high-risk for prediabetes based on the detected number and category of prediabetes-symptom words. To identify differences between the risk groups, we employed t-tests, chi-square tests, and data visualization. Risk factors for prediabetes were identified using multiple logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations. A total of 3270 episodes (12.18%) were classified as potentially high-risk for prediabetes. There were significant differences in the personal, social, and clinical factors between groups. Results revealed that female sex, age, cancer coverage as part of homecare insurance coverage, and family caregivers were significantly associated with an increased risk of prediabetes. Although prediabetes is not a life-threatening disease, uncontrolled blood glucose can cause unfavorable outcomes for other major diseases. Thus, medical professionals should consider the associated symptoms and risk factors of prediabetes. Moreover, the proposed algorithm may support the detection of individuals at a high risk for prediabetes. Implementing this approach could facilitate proactive monitoring and early intervention, leading to reduced healthcare expenses and better health outcomes for community-dwelling adults.

社区成人糖尿病前期的风险因素:具有自然语言处理洞察力的广义估计方程逻辑回归方法。
预计到 2045 年,全球糖尿病前期的发病率将达到 8.3%(5.87 亿人),70% 的糖尿病前期患者在其一生中会发展为糖尿病。我们的目的是根据糖尿病前期相关症状对社区居住的糖尿病前期高危成人进行分类,并确定他们的特征,这些特征可能是与糖尿病前期相关的因素。我们分析了 1628 名 20 岁以上患者的家庭护理记录(n = 26840)。我们使用自然语言处理算法,根据检测到的糖尿病前期症状词汇的数量和类别,将每个护理记录分为糖尿病前期低风险和高风险两类。为了确定风险组之间的差异,我们采用了 t 检验、卡方检验和数据可视化。我们使用带有广义估计方程的多元逻辑回归模型来确定糖尿病前期的风险因素。共有 3270 人(12.18%)被列为糖尿病前期的潜在高危人群。各组之间的个人、社会和临床因素存在明显差异。结果显示,女性性别、年龄、家庭护理保险中的癌症保险以及家庭护理人员与糖尿病前期风险的增加有明显关联。虽然糖尿病前期并不是一种危及生命的疾病,但血糖失控会对其他重大疾病造成不利影响。因此,医务人员应考虑糖尿病前期的相关症状和风险因素。此外,所提出的算法还有助于发现糖尿病前期的高危人群。采用这种方法可以促进主动监测和早期干预,从而降低医疗费用,改善社区成人的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信