The usability of rollators as part of the human-centred quality of mobility devices: a systematic narrative literature review.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Marcel Schmucker, Andreas Küpper, Cornelia Mahler, Astrid Elsbernd
{"title":"The usability of rollators as part of the human-centred quality of mobility devices: a systematic narrative literature review.","authors":"Marcel Schmucker, Andreas Küpper, Cornelia Mahler, Astrid Elsbernd","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2368651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The aim of this literature review was to identify and summarize aspects of the usability of rollators from the currently available research literature. Further objectives were the exploration of rollator requirements and the search for possible disciplinary differences in the consideration or elaboration of usability aspects.</p><p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Following the PRISMA guidelines, the databases CINAHL, Pubmed and Academic Search Elite were examined in the period from April - May 2023. For the synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative data and the identification of prominent themes in this work, a theory driven thematic analysis approach was used.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> A total of 45 publications were included (25 quantitative, 14 mixed methods, 6 qualitative) from various disciplines, the majority belonging to physiotherapy 42%, followed by engineering 16% and health sciences 16%. Aspects of usability were extracted using a deductive code catalogue based on QUEST 2.0. The categories \"easy to use\" (28/126), \"comfort\" (20/126), and \"safety\" (14/126) were most frequently assigned. While \"repairs & servicing\" (5/126), \"service delivery\" (4/126), and \"durability\" (3/126) were coded least frequently.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> So far, no specific publications on the usability of rollators has been published, which made it necessary to summarize individual usability aspects using a deductive code catalogue. The results obtained, therefore, do not allow any generalized statement about the usability of rollators. However, this initiates discussions about the usability of rollators that should be studied in the future in a participatory and user-centred manner and, placing satisfaction more in the focus of usability engineering and evaluation of rollators.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2368651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this literature review was to identify and summarize aspects of the usability of rollators from the currently available research literature. Further objectives were the exploration of rollator requirements and the search for possible disciplinary differences in the consideration or elaboration of usability aspects.

Materials and Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, the databases CINAHL, Pubmed and Academic Search Elite were examined in the period from April - May 2023. For the synthesis of the quantitative and qualitative data and the identification of prominent themes in this work, a theory driven thematic analysis approach was used.

Results: A total of 45 publications were included (25 quantitative, 14 mixed methods, 6 qualitative) from various disciplines, the majority belonging to physiotherapy 42%, followed by engineering 16% and health sciences 16%. Aspects of usability were extracted using a deductive code catalogue based on QUEST 2.0. The categories "easy to use" (28/126), "comfort" (20/126), and "safety" (14/126) were most frequently assigned. While "repairs & servicing" (5/126), "service delivery" (4/126), and "durability" (3/126) were coded least frequently.

Conclusion: So far, no specific publications on the usability of rollators has been published, which made it necessary to summarize individual usability aspects using a deductive code catalogue. The results obtained, therefore, do not allow any generalized statement about the usability of rollators. However, this initiates discussions about the usability of rollators that should be studied in the future in a participatory and user-centred manner and, placing satisfaction more in the focus of usability engineering and evaluation of rollators.

作为以人为本的助行器具质量的一部分,滚轮的可用性:系统性叙事文献综述。
目的:本文献综述旨在从现有的研究文献中识别和总结滚轮车可用性的各个方面。进一步的目标是探讨滚轮车的要求,并寻找在考虑或阐述可用性方面可能存在的学科差异:按照 PRISMA 准则,在 2023 年 4 月至 5 月期间对 CINAHL、Pubmed 和 Academic Search Elite 数据库进行了研究。为了对定量和定性数据进行综合,并确定这项工作的突出主题,我们采用了理论驱动的主题分析方法:共收录了来自不同学科的45篇论文(25篇定量论文、14篇混合方法论文、6篇定性论文),其中物理治疗占42%,其次是工程学16%和健康科学16%。使用基于 QUEST 2.0 的演绎代码目录提取了可用性的各个方面。最常见的类别是 "易于使用"(28/126)、"舒适"(20/126)和 "安全"(14/126)。而 "维修和保养"(5/126)、"服务提供"(4/126)和 "耐用性"(3/126)的编码频率最低:到目前为止,还没有关于滚轮车可用性的专门出版物,因此有必要使用演绎法代码目录对各个可用性方面进行总结。因此,所得出的结果并不能概括滚轮的可用性。不过,这也引发了关于滚轮车可用性的讨论,今后应该以参与和用户为中心的方式对滚轮车的可用性进行研究,并将满意度作为滚轮车可用性工程和评估的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信