Survival outcomes and failure patterns for oropharyngeal cancers treated with simultaneous integrated boost in intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.

Q4 Medicine
V Shivhare, S Rath, I B Shah, N K Dash, A Parikh, U S Kunikullaya
{"title":"Survival outcomes and failure patterns for oropharyngeal cancers treated with simultaneous integrated boost in intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.","authors":"V Shivhare, S Rath, I B Shah, N K Dash, A Parikh, U S Kunikullaya","doi":"10.48095/ccko2024202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become a standard radiotherapy treatment delivery option owing to the advantages it offers in terms of target coverage and organ sparing. Furthermore, the ability to introduce different fractionation for different targets lets us deliver higher doses to the high-risk areas and lower doses to the elective volumes at the same sitting, referred to as simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). In the current study, we intended to retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes and patterns of the failure of oropharyngeal cancers treated with SIB-IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy at our centre and analyze the factors contributing to poorer outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with SIB-IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy were retrieved from the institutional database. Patient demographic details, histopathological features, staging, treatment details, failure patterns and outcomes were documented. All potential factors were evaluated for outcomes. Radiation was delivered by using the SIB-IMRT technique. High-risk planning target volume (PTV) received 66 Gy in 2.2 Gy/fraction, intermediate and low-risk PTV received 60 Gy and 54 Gy, respectively. Primary endpoint was to assess local control (LC), regional control (RC) and loco-regional control (LRC) rates and secondary end point was to evaluate the survival outcomes - overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality. All survival analyzes were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 169 cases were included in the final analysis. The median age was 55 years (range 20-78) with 95.3% males. The base of tongue was the most common primary site. Around 54% cases were node negative with 38% patients having stage IV disease. The local control rates for N0 vs. N+ cases were 74.1 vs. 62.3% (P = 0.046), respectively. Similarly, the 4-year RC rates for N0 vs. N+ cases were 94.4 vs. 83.5% (P = 0.024), respectively. On multivariate analysis, only 4-year RC rates showed significant difference between the two (P = 0.039). No differences were found between T stages in LRC and OS. The 4-year LRC rates for stages 1, 2 vs. 3, 4 were non-significant (69.2 vs. 66.3%; P = 0.178). The 4-year OS rate was 81.3%. The 4-year LC and LRC rates were 67.8 and 89.5%, respectively. There were 54 local and 17 regional failures. The median time to failure was 13 months (range 3.6-82.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SIB-IMRT provides comparable outcomes for oropharyngeal cancers. OS and loco-regional recurrences were significantly worse for nodal positive disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":35565,"journal":{"name":"Klinicka Onkologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinicka Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccko2024202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become a standard radiotherapy treatment delivery option owing to the advantages it offers in terms of target coverage and organ sparing. Furthermore, the ability to introduce different fractionation for different targets lets us deliver higher doses to the high-risk areas and lower doses to the elective volumes at the same sitting, referred to as simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). In the current study, we intended to retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes and patterns of the failure of oropharyngeal cancers treated with SIB-IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy at our centre and analyze the factors contributing to poorer outcomes.

Material and methods: Data of oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with SIB-IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy were retrieved from the institutional database. Patient demographic details, histopathological features, staging, treatment details, failure patterns and outcomes were documented. All potential factors were evaluated for outcomes. Radiation was delivered by using the SIB-IMRT technique. High-risk planning target volume (PTV) received 66 Gy in 2.2 Gy/fraction, intermediate and low-risk PTV received 60 Gy and 54 Gy, respectively. Primary endpoint was to assess local control (LC), regional control (RC) and loco-regional control (LRC) rates and secondary end point was to evaluate the survival outcomes - overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality. All survival analyzes were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 169 cases were included in the final analysis. The median age was 55 years (range 20-78) with 95.3% males. The base of tongue was the most common primary site. Around 54% cases were node negative with 38% patients having stage IV disease. The local control rates for N0 vs. N+ cases were 74.1 vs. 62.3% (P = 0.046), respectively. Similarly, the 4-year RC rates for N0 vs. N+ cases were 94.4 vs. 83.5% (P = 0.024), respectively. On multivariate analysis, only 4-year RC rates showed significant difference between the two (P = 0.039). No differences were found between T stages in LRC and OS. The 4-year LRC rates for stages 1, 2 vs. 3, 4 were non-significant (69.2 vs. 66.3%; P = 0.178). The 4-year OS rate was 81.3%. The 4-year LC and LRC rates were 67.8 and 89.5%, respectively. There were 54 local and 17 regional failures. The median time to failure was 13 months (range 3.6-82.9).

Conclusion: SIB-IMRT provides comparable outcomes for oropharyngeal cancers. OS and loco-regional recurrences were significantly worse for nodal positive disease.

采用调强放射治疗(SIB-IMRT)和同期化疗同时进行综合放疗的口咽癌患者的生存结果和失败模式。
背景:由于调强放射治疗(IMRT)在靶点覆盖和器官疏通方面的优势,它已成为一种标准的放射治疗方法。此外,针对不同靶点采用不同分割的能力让我们能够在同一时间向高风险区域投放较高剂量,向选择性体积投放较低剂量,这被称为同步综合增量(SIB)。本研究旨在回顾性分析本中心采用SIB-IMRT和同期化疗治疗口咽癌失败的临床结果和模式,并分析导致较差结果的因素:从机构数据库中检索口咽癌患者接受SIB-IMRT和同期化疗的数据。记录了患者的人口统计学细节、组织病理学特征、分期、治疗细节、失败模式和结果。对所有可能影响疗效的因素进行了评估。放射治疗采用 SIB-IMRT 技术。高风险计划靶区(PTV)以2.2 Gy/fraction的剂量接受66 Gy的放射治疗,中度和低度风险计划靶区分别接受60 Gy和54 Gy的放射治疗。主要终点是评估局部控制率(LC)、区域控制率(RC)和局部区域控制率(LRC),次要终点是评估生存结果--总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性死亡率。所有生存率分析均采用 Kaplan-Meier 法:最终分析共纳入169个病例。中位年龄为 55 岁(20-78 岁不等),男性占 95.3%。舌根是最常见的原发部位。约54%的病例为结节阴性,38%的患者为IV期。N0与N+病例的局部控制率分别为74.1%与62.3%(P = 0.046)。同样,N0与N+病例的4年RC率分别为94.4%与83.5%(P = 0.024)。在多变量分析中,两者之间只有4年RC率有显著差异(P = 0.039)。在LRC和OS方面,T期之间没有发现差异。1、2期与3、4期的4年LRC率差异不大(69.2%对66.3%;P = 0.178)。4年OS率为81.3%。4年LC和LRC率分别为67.8%和89.5%。54例局部失败,17例区域失败。中位失败时间为13个月(3.6-82.9):结论:SIB-IMRT治疗口咽癌的疗效相当。结论:SIB-IMRT治疗口咽癌的疗效相当,结节阳性患者的OS和局部区域复发率明显更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Klinicka Onkologie
Klinicka Onkologie Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信