{"title":"Patient Retention in a Substance Use Disorder Telemedicine Clinic.","authors":"Justine F Maxwell, Sue S Feldman, Li Li","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although research has continued to show that substance use disorders (SUDs) can be treated effectively with evidence-based treatment, there continues to be gaps in access, and utilization remains low. Alternative SUD treatment methods, including telemedicine, are increasingly being explored to reach patients where traditional in-person treatment approaches are inaccessible. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore SUD treatment retention, specifically comparing telemedicine-delivered opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment with a traditional in-person treatment delivery approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients at Cahaba Medical Care, an FQHC in Birmingham, AL with a diagnosis of OUD and undergoing buprenorphine/naloxone or buprenorphine treatment were categorized into two groups: treatment and control. The dependent variable, retention to SUD treatment, was assessed at four different time periods over 12 months to determine patient SUD consultation appointment attendance. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between SUD treatment retention and delivery mode. Correlations were obtained to assess associations between frequency of urine drug screens performed and SUD treatment retention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the number of the urine drug screens patients received increased by 1, the number of SUD treatment program consultations patients attended increased by 0.69 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in SUD treatment retention between traditional in-person and telemedicine delivered approaches, however.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that a telemedicine-delivered treatment program equals retention effectiveness when compared with in-person delivery. This suggests that leveraging telemedicine to treat patients with SUD could be an effective alternative for those unable to access treatment or who are less likely to attend or complete traditional in-person treatment sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 7","pages":"374-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Although research has continued to show that substance use disorders (SUDs) can be treated effectively with evidence-based treatment, there continues to be gaps in access, and utilization remains low. Alternative SUD treatment methods, including telemedicine, are increasingly being explored to reach patients where traditional in-person treatment approaches are inaccessible. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore SUD treatment retention, specifically comparing telemedicine-delivered opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment with a traditional in-person treatment delivery approach.
Methods: Patients at Cahaba Medical Care, an FQHC in Birmingham, AL with a diagnosis of OUD and undergoing buprenorphine/naloxone or buprenorphine treatment were categorized into two groups: treatment and control. The dependent variable, retention to SUD treatment, was assessed at four different time periods over 12 months to determine patient SUD consultation appointment attendance. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between SUD treatment retention and delivery mode. Correlations were obtained to assess associations between frequency of urine drug screens performed and SUD treatment retention.
Results: As the number of the urine drug screens patients received increased by 1, the number of SUD treatment program consultations patients attended increased by 0.69 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in SUD treatment retention between traditional in-person and telemedicine delivered approaches, however.
Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that a telemedicine-delivered treatment program equals retention effectiveness when compared with in-person delivery. This suggests that leveraging telemedicine to treat patients with SUD could be an effective alternative for those unable to access treatment or who are less likely to attend or complete traditional in-person treatment sessions.
目标:尽管研究不断表明,药物使用障碍 (SUD) 可以通过循证治疗得到有效治疗,但在获得治疗方面仍然存在差距,而且利用率仍然很低。人们越来越多地探索包括远程医疗在内的其他药物滥用障碍治疗方法,以帮助那些无法获得传统面对面治疗方法的患者。这项横断面研究旨在探讨 SUD 治疗的保留率,特别是将远程医疗提供的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗与传统的面对面治疗方法进行比较:在阿拉巴马州伯明翰的一家 FQHC 卡哈巴医疗保健中心,诊断为 OUD 并接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮或丁丙诺啡治疗的患者被分为两组:治疗组和对照组。因变量 "接受 SUD 治疗的保留率 "在 12 个月内的四个不同时间段进行评估,以确定患者 SUD 咨询预约的出席率。采用多元线性回归的方法来检验 SUD 治疗保留率与提供模式之间的关系。结果显示,尿液药物筛查次数与 SUD 治疗保留率之间存在相关性:当患者接受的尿液药物筛查次数增加 1 次时,患者参加 SUD 治疗项目咨询的次数增加了 0.69 次(P < 0.001)。但是,传统的面对面治疗和远程医疗提供的 SUD 治疗保留率没有明显差异:本研究结果表明,远程医疗提供的治疗方案与面对面提供的治疗方案相比,在保留率方面具有同等效果。这表明,对于那些无法获得治疗或不太可能参加或完成传统面对面治疗的患者来说,利用远程医疗来治疗 SUD 患者不失为一种有效的替代方法。
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.