Significant increase in the number of occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Centre (2016-2022): the importance of poison centre data in health surveillance.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2370303
Anja Wijnands, Maël Thielman, Claudine Hunault, Arjen Koppen, Dylan de Lange, Saskia Rietjens
{"title":"Significant increase in the number of occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Centre (2016-2022): the importance of poison centre data in health surveillance.","authors":"Anja Wijnands, Maël Thielman, Claudine Hunault, Arjen Koppen, Dylan de Lange, Saskia Rietjens","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2370303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace can result in injuries and fatalities. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and trend of occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Centre and to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the trend.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of all acute occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Centre between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 was performed. Data on patient and exposure characteristics, symptoms and treatment recommendations were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2022, the Dutch Poisons Information Centre received 5,508 calls regarding acute occupational exposures. The annual number of calls on acute occupational exposures almost doubled over the years studied (from 475 in 2016 to 936 in 2022). During and after the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-December 2022), the number of calls stabilized, but the upward trend was not significantly affected. There were an estimated 0.20 calls per 1,000 human exposure calls per month (95 per cent confidence interval: -0.14; 0.53). Victims were often exposed through multiple routes, with inhalation being the most common route (44 per cent), followed by ocular (32 per cent) and dermal contact (30 per cent). Acids (1,138 exposures) and alkalis (912 exposures) were often involved. The Dutch Poisons Information Centre had information on 6,334 patients, although the total number of exposed patients was not known as some victims did not seek medical assistance, or were treated by healthcare professionals who did not consult our Centre. At the time of contact, 13 per cent (<i>n</i> = 795) of the patients reported no symptoms, 76 per cent (<i>n</i> = 4,805) reported mild to moderate symptoms and 3 per cent (<i>n</i> = 183) reported potentially severe symptoms. Information on symptoms was missing for 9 per cent (<i>n</i> = 551) of the patients. Hospital observation and treatment were recommended for 5 per cent (<i>n</i> = 325) of the patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights the necessity for poisoning prevention strategies to reduce the number of work-related incidents involving hazardous substances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The continuing increase in the number of workplace incidents involving hazardous substances is of concern. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach should be taken to gain a full understanding of occupational exposure to hazardous substances and to identify risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"396-403"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2370303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace can result in injuries and fatalities. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and trend of occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Centre and to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the trend.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all acute occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Centre between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 was performed. Data on patient and exposure characteristics, symptoms and treatment recommendations were analyzed.

Results: Between 2016 and 2022, the Dutch Poisons Information Centre received 5,508 calls regarding acute occupational exposures. The annual number of calls on acute occupational exposures almost doubled over the years studied (from 475 in 2016 to 936 in 2022). During and after the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-December 2022), the number of calls stabilized, but the upward trend was not significantly affected. There were an estimated 0.20 calls per 1,000 human exposure calls per month (95 per cent confidence interval: -0.14; 0.53). Victims were often exposed through multiple routes, with inhalation being the most common route (44 per cent), followed by ocular (32 per cent) and dermal contact (30 per cent). Acids (1,138 exposures) and alkalis (912 exposures) were often involved. The Dutch Poisons Information Centre had information on 6,334 patients, although the total number of exposed patients was not known as some victims did not seek medical assistance, or were treated by healthcare professionals who did not consult our Centre. At the time of contact, 13 per cent (n = 795) of the patients reported no symptoms, 76 per cent (n = 4,805) reported mild to moderate symptoms and 3 per cent (n = 183) reported potentially severe symptoms. Information on symptoms was missing for 9 per cent (n = 551) of the patients. Hospital observation and treatment were recommended for 5 per cent (n = 325) of the patients.

Discussion: This study highlights the necessity for poisoning prevention strategies to reduce the number of work-related incidents involving hazardous substances.

Conclusion: The continuing increase in the number of workplace incidents involving hazardous substances is of concern. A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach should be taken to gain a full understanding of occupational exposure to hazardous substances and to identify risk factors.

向荷兰毒物信息中心报告的职业接触数量大幅增加(2016-2022 年):毒物中心数据在健康监测中的重要性。
导言:在工作场所接触有害物质可能导致伤亡。本研究旨在调查向荷兰毒物信息中心报告的职业暴露的特点和趋势,并调查 COVID-19 大流行是否对这一趋势产生了影响:方法:对2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间向荷兰毒物信息中心报告的所有急性职业暴露进行了回顾性分析。方法:对2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间向荷兰毒物信息中心报告的所有急性职业暴露进行了回顾性分析,分析了患者和暴露特征、症状和治疗建议等数据:结果:2016 年至 2022 年间,荷兰毒物信息中心共接到 5508 个有关急性职业接触的电话。在研究的这几年中,每年有关急性职业暴露的电话数量几乎翻了一番(从 2016 年的 475 个增加到 2022 年的 936 个)。在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后(2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 12 月),来电数量趋于稳定,但上升趋势并未受到明显影响。据估计,每月每 1,000 个人类接触呼叫中有 0.20 个呼叫(95% 置信区间:-0.14; 0.53)。受害者通常通过多种途径接触到有毒物质,其中吸入是最常见的途径(44%),其次是眼部接触(32%)和皮肤接触(30%)。经常涉及酸(1 138 次接触)和碱(912 次接触)。荷兰毒物信息中心掌握了 6,334 名患者的信息,但由于一些受害者没有寻求医疗救助,或由专业医护人员进行治疗,而这些专业医护人员并没有向我们的中心咨询,因此接触患者的总人数并不清楚。在接触时,13% 的患者(n = 795)报告没有症状,76% 的患者(n = 4 805)报告有轻度至中度症状,3% 的患者(n = 183)报告有潜在的严重症状。9%的患者(n = 551)没有症状信息。5%的患者(n = 325)被建议住院观察和治疗:讨论:本研究强调了制定中毒预防战略以减少涉及危险物质的工伤事故的必要性:结论:涉及有害物质的工作场所事故数量的持续增长令人担忧。应采取全面和多学科的方法来全面了解职业接触有害物质的情况,并找出风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信