Plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, axonal, and neuroinflammation pathologies in dementia with Lewy bodies.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Agathe Vrillon, Olivier Bousiges, Karl Götze, Catherine Demuynck, Candice Muller, Alix Ravier, Benoît Schorr, Nathalie Philippi, Claire Hourregue, Emmanuel Cognat, Julien Dumurgier, Matthieu Lilamand, Benjamin Cretin, Frédéric Blanc, Claire Paquet
{"title":"Plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, axonal, and neuroinflammation pathologies in dementia with Lewy bodies.","authors":"Agathe Vrillon, Olivier Bousiges, Karl Götze, Catherine Demuynck, Candice Muller, Alix Ravier, Benoît Schorr, Nathalie Philippi, Claire Hourregue, Emmanuel Cognat, Julien Dumurgier, Matthieu Lilamand, Benjamin Cretin, Frédéric Blanc, Claire Paquet","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01502-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing evidence supports the use of plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation for diagnosis of dementia. However, their performance for positive and differential diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) in clinical settings is still uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective biomarker study in two tertiary memory centers, Paris Lariboisière and CM2RR Strasbourg, France, enrolling patients with DLB (n = 104), Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 76), and neurological controls (NC, n = 27). Measured biomarkers included plasma Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio, p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP using SIMOA and plasma YKL-40 and sTREM2 using ELISA. DLB patients with available CSF analysis (n = 90) were stratified according to their CSF Aβ profile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLB patients displayed modified plasma Aβ ratio, p-tau181, and GFAP levels compared with NC and modified plasma Aβ ratio, p-tau181, GFAP, NfL, and sTREM2 levels compared with AD patients. Plasma p-tau181 best differentiated DLB from AD patients (ROC analysis, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.80) and NC (AUC = 0.78), and combining biomarkers did not improve diagnosis performance. Plasma p-tau181 was the best standalone biomarker to differentiate amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative DLB cases (AUC = 0.75) and was associated with cognitive status in the DLB group. Combining plasma Aβ ratio, p-tau181 and NfL increased performance to identify amyloid copathology (AUC = 0.79). Principal component analysis identified different segregation patterns of biomarkers in the DLB and AD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation plasma biomarkers are modified in DLB, albeit with moderate diagnosis performance. Plasma p-tau181 can contribute to identify Aβ copathology in DLB.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01502-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidence supports the use of plasma biomarkers of amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation for diagnosis of dementia. However, their performance for positive and differential diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) in clinical settings is still uncertain.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective biomarker study in two tertiary memory centers, Paris Lariboisière and CM2RR Strasbourg, France, enrolling patients with DLB (n = 104), Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 76), and neurological controls (NC, n = 27). Measured biomarkers included plasma Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio, p-tau181, NfL, and GFAP using SIMOA and plasma YKL-40 and sTREM2 using ELISA. DLB patients with available CSF analysis (n = 90) were stratified according to their CSF Aβ profile.

Results: DLB patients displayed modified plasma Aβ ratio, p-tau181, and GFAP levels compared with NC and modified plasma Aβ ratio, p-tau181, GFAP, NfL, and sTREM2 levels compared with AD patients. Plasma p-tau181 best differentiated DLB from AD patients (ROC analysis, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.80) and NC (AUC = 0.78), and combining biomarkers did not improve diagnosis performance. Plasma p-tau181 was the best standalone biomarker to differentiate amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative DLB cases (AUC = 0.75) and was associated with cognitive status in the DLB group. Combining plasma Aβ ratio, p-tau181 and NfL increased performance to identify amyloid copathology (AUC = 0.79). Principal component analysis identified different segregation patterns of biomarkers in the DLB and AD groups.

Conclusions: Amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation plasma biomarkers are modified in DLB, albeit with moderate diagnosis performance. Plasma p-tau181 can contribute to identify Aβ copathology in DLB.

路易体痴呆症中淀粉样蛋白、tau、轴突和神经炎症病理的血浆生物标志物。
背景:越来越多的证据支持使用淀粉样蛋白、tau、神经变性和神经炎症等血浆生物标志物诊断痴呆症。然而,在临床环境中,这些生物标志物在路易体痴呆(DLB)的阳性诊断和鉴别诊断中的表现仍不确定:我们在法国巴黎拉里布瓦耶尔和斯特拉斯堡 CM2RR 两家三级记忆中心开展了一项回顾性生物标志物研究,研究对象包括路易体痴呆患者(104 人)、阿尔茨海默病(AD,76 人)和神经系统对照组(NC,27 人)。测量的生物标志物包括使用 SIMOA 测量的血浆 Aβ40/Aβ42 比率、p-tau181、NfL 和 GFAP,以及使用 ELISA 测量的血浆 YKL-40 和 sTREM2。根据脑脊液Aβ图谱对有脑脊液分析结果的DLB患者(n = 90)进行分层:结果:与NC患者相比,DLB患者的血浆Aβ比值、p-tau181和GFAP水平有所改变;与AD患者相比,DLB患者的血浆Aβ比值、p-tau181、GFAP、NfL和sTREM2水平有所改变。血浆p-tau181是区分DLB与AD患者(ROC分析,曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.80)和NC患者(AUC = 0.78)的最佳指标,结合使用生物标记物并不能提高诊断效果。血浆p-tau181是区分淀粉样蛋白阳性和淀粉样蛋白阴性DLB病例的最佳独立生物标志物(AUC = 0.75),并且与DLB组的认知状况相关。结合血浆Aβ比值、p-tau181和NfL可提高识别淀粉样蛋白共病理学的能力(AUC = 0.79)。主成分分析确定了DLB组和AD组生物标志物的不同分离模式:结论:淀粉样蛋白、tau、神经变性和神经炎症血浆生物标志物在DLB中有所改变,尽管诊断效果一般。血浆p-tau181有助于鉴别DLB的Aβ共病理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信