Web Site Accessibility Among Doctor of Physical Therapy Programs in the United States.

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000357
Brandon M Ness, Neeti Pathare, Mark P Wilhelm, Elizabeth C Wonsetler-Jones, Jennifer Parent-Nichols
{"title":"Web Site Accessibility Among Doctor of Physical Therapy Programs in the United States.","authors":"Brandon M Ness, Neeti Pathare, Mark P Wilhelm, Elizabeth C Wonsetler-Jones, Jennifer Parent-Nichols","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Given the impetus to improve accessibility for diverse learners seeking physical therapist education, it is critical that all entry points to access information have minimal barriers. This study identified Web site accessibility barriers among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Web site accessibility has been evaluated among many institutions of higher education, but none focused on DPT education. Individuals with disabilities may be adversely affected by Web site accessibility barriers.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 262 DPT programs in the United States. Doctor of Physical Therapy program characteristics collected were geographic region, institutional control type (public/private), medical school affiliation, accreditation status, total institutional enrollment, and DPT class size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Web Accessibility Evaluation (WAVE) Tool assessed data related to accessibility barriers among DPT program homepage Uniform Resource Locators. Three primary outcomes from the WAVE Tool included WAVE Total Errors, Error Density, and Total Alerts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Web site homepage accessibility barriers varied among programs for WAVE Total Errors (range 0-150), Error Density (range 0-14.6%), and Total Alerts (range 1-331). Median Total Errors were greater among private (9.0) versus public (5.0) institution Web sites ( P < .001). Median Total Errors were greater among those institutions not affiliated with a medical school (9.0) compared with those that had an affiliated medical school (7.0) ( P = .04). No differences in accessibility barriers were identified according to geographic region or accreditation status ( P > .05). Median Total Errors were significantly different between institutional enrollment quartiles (H[3] = 17.9, P < .001), with no differences noted between DPT class size quartiles for any outcome ( P > .05). Generally, weak-fair inverse correlations were observed between student enrollment for the institution and Web site accessibility barrier outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Homepage accessibility barriers varied greatly among DPT programs in the United States. Factors, including being a private institution, no medical school affiliation, and lower institutional enrollment, were related to increased accessibility barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":"91-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Given the impetus to improve accessibility for diverse learners seeking physical therapist education, it is critical that all entry points to access information have minimal barriers. This study identified Web site accessibility barriers among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs in the United States.

Review of literature: Web site accessibility has been evaluated among many institutions of higher education, but none focused on DPT education. Individuals with disabilities may be adversely affected by Web site accessibility barriers.

Subjects: This cross-sectional study included 262 DPT programs in the United States. Doctor of Physical Therapy program characteristics collected were geographic region, institutional control type (public/private), medical school affiliation, accreditation status, total institutional enrollment, and DPT class size.

Methods: The Web Accessibility Evaluation (WAVE) Tool assessed data related to accessibility barriers among DPT program homepage Uniform Resource Locators. Three primary outcomes from the WAVE Tool included WAVE Total Errors, Error Density, and Total Alerts.

Results: Web site homepage accessibility barriers varied among programs for WAVE Total Errors (range 0-150), Error Density (range 0-14.6%), and Total Alerts (range 1-331). Median Total Errors were greater among private (9.0) versus public (5.0) institution Web sites ( P < .001). Median Total Errors were greater among those institutions not affiliated with a medical school (9.0) compared with those that had an affiliated medical school (7.0) ( P = .04). No differences in accessibility barriers were identified according to geographic region or accreditation status ( P > .05). Median Total Errors were significantly different between institutional enrollment quartiles (H[3] = 17.9, P < .001), with no differences noted between DPT class size quartiles for any outcome ( P > .05). Generally, weak-fair inverse correlations were observed between student enrollment for the institution and Web site accessibility barrier outcomes.

Discussion and conclusion: Homepage accessibility barriers varied greatly among DPT programs in the United States. Factors, including being a private institution, no medical school affiliation, and lower institutional enrollment, were related to increased accessibility barriers.

美国物理治疗博士课程的网站可访问性。
导言:考虑到为寻求物理治疗师教育的不同学习者提高可访问性的推动力,所有获取信息的入口必须具有最小的障碍。本研究发现了美国物理治疗博士(DPT)课程中存在的网站可访问性障碍:许多高等教育机构都对网站的可访问性进行了评估,但没有一家机构关注 DPT 教育。残障人士可能会受到网站无障碍性的不利影响:这项横向研究包括美国的 262 个 DPT 项目。收集的理疗博士项目特征包括地理区域、机构控制类型(公立/私立)、医学院隶属关系、认证状态、机构总注册人数以及 DPT 班级规模:网络可访问性评估(WAVE)工具评估了 DPT 项目主页统一资源定位器中与可访问性障碍相关的数据。WAVE 工具的三个主要结果包括 WAVE 错误总数、错误密度和警报总数:在 WAVE 总错误数(范围 0-150)、错误密度(范围 0-14.6%)和总警报数(范围 1-331)方面,不同项目的网站主页可访问性障碍各不相同。私立(9.0)与公立(5.0)机构网站的总错误中位数差异更大(P < .001)。不隶属于医学院的机构(9.0)与隶属于医学院的机构(7.0)相比,错误总数中位数更高(P = .04)。根据地理区域或认证状态的不同,无障碍障碍也不存在差异(P > .05)。总误差中位数在院校入学人数四分位数之间存在显著差异(H[3] = 17.9,P < .001),而在任何结果上,DPT班级规模四分位数之间均无差异(P > .05)。一般来说,院校学生注册人数与网站无障碍障碍结果之间呈弱-公平反相关关系:美国的 DPT 项目之间的网站无障碍障碍差异很大。包括私立院校、无医学院附属机构和院校注册人数较少在内的因素与无障碍性增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信