Using Simulation-Based Mastery Learning to Achieve Excellent Learning Outcomes in Physical Therapist Education.

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000358
Rachel S Tappan, Heidi R Roth, William C McGaghie
{"title":"Using Simulation-Based Mastery Learning to Achieve Excellent Learning Outcomes in Physical Therapist Education.","authors":"Rachel S Tappan, Heidi R Roth, William C McGaghie","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2 aims of this observational study are (a) to describe the implementation and feasibility of a bed mobility skills simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curricular module for physical therapist students and (b) to measure learning outcomes and student perceptions of this module.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Simulation-based mastery learning is an outcome-based educational approach that has been successful in other health professions but has not been explored in physical therapy education.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Eighty-seven students in a single cohort of a Doctor of Physical Therapy program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SBML module in this pretest-posttest study included a pretest, instruction, initial posttest, and additional rounds of instruction and assessment as needed for all learners to achieve the minimum passing standard (MPS) set using the Mastery Angoff and Patient Safety methods. Outcome measures were bed mobility assessment pass rates and scores, additional student and faculty time compared with a traditional approach, and student perceptions of their self-confidence and the module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All students achieved the MPS after 3 rounds of training and assessment beyond the initial posttest. Mean Total Scores improved from 67.6% (12.9%) at pretest to 91.4% (4.8%) at mastery posttest ( P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.8, 95% CI [1.4-2.1]); mean Safety Scores improved from 75.2% (16.0%) at pretest to 100.0% (0.0%) at mastery posttest ( P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.5, 95% CI [1.2-1.9]). Students who did not achieve the MPS at the initial posttest ( n = 30) required a mean of 1.2 hours for additional instruction and assessment. Survey results revealed an increase in student confidence ( P < .001) and positive student perceptions of the module.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Implementation of this SBML module was feasible and resulted in uniformly high levels of bed mobility skill acquisition. Based on rigorous learning outcomes, feasible requirements for implementation, and increased student confidence, SBML offers a promising approach for wider implementation in physical therapy education.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2 aims of this observational study are (a) to describe the implementation and feasibility of a bed mobility skills simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curricular module for physical therapist students and (b) to measure learning outcomes and student perceptions of this module.

Review of literature: Simulation-based mastery learning is an outcome-based educational approach that has been successful in other health professions but has not been explored in physical therapy education.

Subjects: Eighty-seven students in a single cohort of a Doctor of Physical Therapy program.

Methods: The SBML module in this pretest-posttest study included a pretest, instruction, initial posttest, and additional rounds of instruction and assessment as needed for all learners to achieve the minimum passing standard (MPS) set using the Mastery Angoff and Patient Safety methods. Outcome measures were bed mobility assessment pass rates and scores, additional student and faculty time compared with a traditional approach, and student perceptions of their self-confidence and the module.

Results: All students achieved the MPS after 3 rounds of training and assessment beyond the initial posttest. Mean Total Scores improved from 67.6% (12.9%) at pretest to 91.4% (4.8%) at mastery posttest ( P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.8, 95% CI [1.4-2.1]); mean Safety Scores improved from 75.2% (16.0%) at pretest to 100.0% (0.0%) at mastery posttest ( P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.5, 95% CI [1.2-1.9]). Students who did not achieve the MPS at the initial posttest ( n = 30) required a mean of 1.2 hours for additional instruction and assessment. Survey results revealed an increase in student confidence ( P < .001) and positive student perceptions of the module.

Discussion and conclusion: Implementation of this SBML module was feasible and resulted in uniformly high levels of bed mobility skill acquisition. Based on rigorous learning outcomes, feasible requirements for implementation, and increased student confidence, SBML offers a promising approach for wider implementation in physical therapy education.

在物理治疗师教育中使用基于模拟的掌握学习来实现卓越的学习成果。
导言:本观察性研究的两个目的是:(a)描述针对理疗师学生的床上移动技能模拟掌握学习(SBML)课程模块的实施情况和可行性;(b)测量学习成果和学生对该模块的看法:文献综述:基于模拟的掌握学习是一种基于结果的教育方法,在其他健康职业中取得了成功,但在物理治疗教育中尚未探索过:研究对象:物理治疗学博士课程的 87 名学生:本研究中的 SBML 模块包括前测、指导、初始后测,以及根据需要对所有学员进行的额外指导和评估,以达到使用掌握安戈夫和患者安全方法设定的最低合格标准 (MPS)。衡量结果的指标包括床面移动性评估的通过率和得分、与传统方法相比学生和教师增加的时间、学生对其自信心和该模块的看法:结果:除了最初的后测之外,经过三轮培训和评估后,所有学生都达到了 MPS 标准。平均总分从预测时的 67.6% (12.9%) 提高到掌握后测试时的 91.4% (4.8%)(P < .001,Cohen's d = 1.8,95% CI [1.4-2.1]);平均安全分数从预测时的 75.2% (16.0%) 提高到掌握后测试时的 100.0% (0.0%)(P < .001,Cohen's d = 1.5,95% CI [1.2-1.9])。在初次后测中未达到 MPS 的学生(n = 30)平均需要 1.2 小时的额外指导和评估。调查结果显示,学生的自信心有所增强(P < .001),学生对该模块的看法也很积极:讨论与结论:该 SBML 模块的实施是可行的,而且学生对床上移动技能的掌握程度一致较高。基于严格的学习成果、可行的实施要求和学生信心的增强,SBML 为物理治疗教育的广泛实施提供了一种前景广阔的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信