Can Biomarkers Correctly Predict Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Patients Treated With Targeted Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest? An Exploratory Study of the Multicenter Randomized Antibiotic (ANTHARTIC) Study.

Q4 Medicine
Nicolas Deye, Amelie Le Gouge, Bruno François, Camille Chenevier-Gobeaux, Thomas Daix, Hamid Merdji, Alain Cariou, Pierre-François Dequin, Christophe Guitton, Bruno Mégarbane, Jacques Callebert, Bruno Giraudeau, Alexandre Mebazaa, Nicolas Vodovar
{"title":"Can Biomarkers Correctly Predict Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Patients Treated With Targeted Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest? An Exploratory Study of the Multicenter Randomized Antibiotic (ANTHARTIC) Study.","authors":"Nicolas Deye, Amelie Le Gouge, Bruno François, Camille Chenevier-Gobeaux, Thomas Daix, Hamid Merdji, Alain Cariou, Pierre-François Dequin, Christophe Guitton, Bruno Mégarbane, Jacques Callebert, Bruno Giraudeau, Alexandre Mebazaa, Nicolas Vodovar","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) frequently occurs in patients with cardiac arrest. Diagnosis of VAP after cardiac arrest remains challenging, while the use of current biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin (PCT) is debated.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate biomarkers' impact in helping VAP diagnosis after cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Design setting and participants: </strong>This is a prospective ancillary study of the randomized, multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled ANtibiotherapy during Therapeutic HypothermiA to pRevenT Infectious Complications (ANTHARTIC) trial evaluating the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent VAP in out-of-hospital patients with cardiac arrest secondary to shockable rhythm and treated with therapeutic hypothermia. An adjudication committee blindly evaluated VAP according to predefined clinical, radiologic, and microbiological criteria. All patients with available biomarker(s), sample(s), and consent approval were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main endpoint was to evaluate the ability of biomarkers to correctly diagnose and predict VAP within 48 hours after sampling. The secondary endpoint was to study the combination of two biomarkers in discriminating VAP. Blood samples were collected at baseline on day 3. Routine and exploratory panel of inflammatory biomarkers measurements were blindly performed. Analyses were adjusted on the randomization group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 161 patients of the ANTHARTIC trial with available biological sample(s), patients with VAP (<i>n</i> = 33) had higher body mass index and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, more unwitnessed cardiac arrest, more catecholamines, and experienced more prolonged therapeutic hypothermia duration than patients without VAP (<i>n</i> = 121). In univariate analyses, biomarkers significantly associated with VAP and showing an area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.70 were CRP (AUC = 0.76), interleukin (IL) 17A and 17C (IL17C) (0.74), macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 (0.73), PCT (0.72), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) (0.71). Multivariate analysis combining novel biomarkers revealed several pairs with <i>p</i> value of less than 0.001 and odds ratio greater than 1: VEGF-A + IL12 subunit beta (IL12B), Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligands (Flt3L) + C-C chemokine 20 (CCL20), Flt3L + IL17A, Flt3L + IL6, STAM-binding protein (STAMBP) + CCL20, STAMBP + IL6, CCL20 + 4EBP1, CCL20 + caspase-8 (CASP8), IL6 + 4EBP1, and IL6 + CASP8. Best AUCs were observed for CRP + IL6 (0.79), CRP + CCL20 (0.78), CRP + IL17A, and CRP + IL17C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Our exploratory study shows that specific biomarkers, especially CRP combined with IL6, could help to better diagnose or predict early VAP occurrence in cardiac arrest patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) frequently occurs in patients with cardiac arrest. Diagnosis of VAP after cardiac arrest remains challenging, while the use of current biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) or procalcitonin (PCT) is debated.

Objectives: To evaluate biomarkers' impact in helping VAP diagnosis after cardiac arrest.

Design setting and participants: This is a prospective ancillary study of the randomized, multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled ANtibiotherapy during Therapeutic HypothermiA to pRevenT Infectious Complications (ANTHARTIC) trial evaluating the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent VAP in out-of-hospital patients with cardiac arrest secondary to shockable rhythm and treated with therapeutic hypothermia. An adjudication committee blindly evaluated VAP according to predefined clinical, radiologic, and microbiological criteria. All patients with available biomarker(s), sample(s), and consent approval were included.

Main outcomes and measures: The main endpoint was to evaluate the ability of biomarkers to correctly diagnose and predict VAP within 48 hours after sampling. The secondary endpoint was to study the combination of two biomarkers in discriminating VAP. Blood samples were collected at baseline on day 3. Routine and exploratory panel of inflammatory biomarkers measurements were blindly performed. Analyses were adjusted on the randomization group.

Results: Among 161 patients of the ANTHARTIC trial with available biological sample(s), patients with VAP (n = 33) had higher body mass index and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, more unwitnessed cardiac arrest, more catecholamines, and experienced more prolonged therapeutic hypothermia duration than patients without VAP (n = 121). In univariate analyses, biomarkers significantly associated with VAP and showing an area under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.70 were CRP (AUC = 0.76), interleukin (IL) 17A and 17C (IL17C) (0.74), macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 (0.73), PCT (0.72), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) (0.71). Multivariate analysis combining novel biomarkers revealed several pairs with p value of less than 0.001 and odds ratio greater than 1: VEGF-A + IL12 subunit beta (IL12B), Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligands (Flt3L) + C-C chemokine 20 (CCL20), Flt3L + IL17A, Flt3L + IL6, STAM-binding protein (STAMBP) + CCL20, STAMBP + IL6, CCL20 + 4EBP1, CCL20 + caspase-8 (CASP8), IL6 + 4EBP1, and IL6 + CASP8. Best AUCs were observed for CRP + IL6 (0.79), CRP + CCL20 (0.78), CRP + IL17A, and CRP + IL17C.

Conclusions and relevance: Our exploratory study shows that specific biomarkers, especially CRP combined with IL6, could help to better diagnose or predict early VAP occurrence in cardiac arrest patients.

生物标志物能否正确预测心脏骤停后接受目标体温管理患者的呼吸机相关肺炎?多中心随机抗生素 (ANTHARTIC) 研究的一项探索性研究。
重要性:呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)经常发生在心脏骤停患者身上。心脏骤停后 VAP 的诊断仍具有挑战性,而目前对 C 反应蛋白(CRP)或降钙素原(PCT)等生物标志物的使用存在争议:评估生物标志物对心脏骤停后 VAP 诊断的影响:这是一项随机、多中心、双盲安慰剂对照 "治疗性低温期间抗生素治疗以预防感染性并发症(ANTHARTIC)"试验的前瞻性辅助研究,该试验评估了抗生素预防性治疗对预防院外心脏骤停患者VAP的影响。评审委员会根据预定义的临床、放射学和微生物学标准对 VAP 进行盲法评估。所有提供生物标志物、样本并获得同意的患者都被纳入其中:主要终点是评估生物标记物在取样后 48 小时内正确诊断和预测 VAP 的能力。次要终点是研究两种生物标记物的组合在鉴别 VAP 方面的作用。第 3 天采集基线血样。常规和探索性炎症生物标记物测量均在盲法下进行。分析结果根据随机分组进行了调整:结果:在 161 名有生物样本的 ANTHARTIC 试验患者中,与无 VAP 患者(n = 121)相比,有 VAP 患者(n = 33)的体重指数和急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分更高,有更多未经目击的心脏骤停,儿茶酚胺含量更高,治疗性低温持续时间更长。在单变量分析中,与 VAP 显著相关且曲线下面积 (AUC) 大于 0.70 的生物标记物是 CRP(AUC = 0.76)、白细胞介素 (IL) 17A 和 17C (IL17C)(0.74)、巨噬细胞集落刺激因子 1 (0.73)、PCT (0.72) 和血管内皮生长因子 A (VEGF-A)(0.71)。结合新型生物标志物的多变量分析显示,有几对生物标志物的 p 值小于 0.001 且几率比大于 1:VEGF-A+IL12亚基β(IL12B)、Fms相关酪氨酸激酶3配体(Flt3L)+C-C趋化因子20(CCL20)、Flt3L+IL17A、Flt3L+IL6、STAM结合蛋白(STAMBP)+CCL20、STAMBP+IL6、CCL20+4EBP1、CCL20+Caspase-8(CASP8)、IL6+4EBP1和IL6+CASP8。CRP+IL6(0.79)、CRP+CCL20(0.78)、CRP+IL17A和CRP+IL17C的AUC最佳:我们的探索性研究表明,特定的生物标志物,尤其是 CRP 与 IL6 的结合,有助于更好地诊断或预测心脏骤停患者早期 VAP 的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信