Urinary Incontinence Medications: Patient-Initiated Concerns in Primary Care.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Joan Neuner, Emily Schmitt, Aaron Winn, Emily Davidson, Robert C O'Connor, Sarah Marowski, Marie Luebke, Joanna Balza, Madeline Attewell, Kathryn E Flynn
{"title":"Urinary Incontinence Medications: Patient-Initiated Concerns in Primary Care.","authors":"Joan Neuner, Emily Schmitt, Aaron Winn, Emily Davidson, Robert C O'Connor, Sarah Marowski, Marie Luebke, Joanna Balza, Madeline Attewell, Kathryn E Flynn","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Guideline-recommended medications for overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence (OAB/UUI) are effective but have high costs and side effects. Little is known about patient concerns regarding these medications when prescribed by their primary care providers (PCPs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to describe PCP-patient interactions when prescribing medications for OAB/UUI, specifically clinical concerns, cost and authorization issues, and mode of communication for these interactions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using electronic health records, we identified a retrospective cohort of women aged 18-89 years who were prescribed a medication for OAB/UUI during a primary care office visit from 2017 to 2018. We examined the electronic health record from initial prescription through 15 subsequent months for documentation of prior authorization requests and patient concerns about cost, side effects, or ineffectiveness. The association of patient demographics, comorbidity, and medication class with these concerns was examined with logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 46.2% of patients (n = 123) had 1 or more OAB/UUI medication concerns, and 52 reported outside an office visit. Only higher comorbidity was associated with reduced concern of any type. Although the overall percent age of patients reporting concerns was similar by medication type, the patterns of concern type varied. Compared with those taking short-acting antimuscarinics, patients taking long-acting antimuscarinics other than oxybutynin were less likely to have side effect concerns (adjusted odds ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.78) and more likely to have cost concerns (adjusted odds ratio 5.10, 95% CI 1.53-17.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient concerns regarding OAB/UUI medications were common in primary care practices and frequently reported outside of office visits. However, the patterns of concerns (cost vs side effects) varied between medication classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Guideline-recommended medications for overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence (OAB/UUI) are effective but have high costs and side effects. Little is known about patient concerns regarding these medications when prescribed by their primary care providers (PCPs).

Objective: The aim of the study was to describe PCP-patient interactions when prescribing medications for OAB/UUI, specifically clinical concerns, cost and authorization issues, and mode of communication for these interactions.

Study design: Using electronic health records, we identified a retrospective cohort of women aged 18-89 years who were prescribed a medication for OAB/UUI during a primary care office visit from 2017 to 2018. We examined the electronic health record from initial prescription through 15 subsequent months for documentation of prior authorization requests and patient concerns about cost, side effects, or ineffectiveness. The association of patient demographics, comorbidity, and medication class with these concerns was examined with logistic regression models.

Results: Overall, 46.2% of patients (n = 123) had 1 or more OAB/UUI medication concerns, and 52 reported outside an office visit. Only higher comorbidity was associated with reduced concern of any type. Although the overall percent age of patients reporting concerns was similar by medication type, the patterns of concern type varied. Compared with those taking short-acting antimuscarinics, patients taking long-acting antimuscarinics other than oxybutynin were less likely to have side effect concerns (adjusted odds ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.78) and more likely to have cost concerns (adjusted odds ratio 5.10, 95% CI 1.53-17.03).

Conclusions: Patient concerns regarding OAB/UUI medications were common in primary care practices and frequently reported outside of office visits. However, the patterns of concerns (cost vs side effects) varied between medication classes.

尿失禁药物:初级保健中患者主动关注的问题。
重要性:指南推荐的治疗膀胱过度活动症和急迫性尿失禁(OAB/UUI)的药物虽然有效,但成本高且副作用大。对于患者在初级保健提供者(PCP)处方这些药物时所关心的问题,我们知之甚少:研究目的:本研究旨在描述初级保健医生在开具 OAB/UUI 药物处方时与患者之间的互动,特别是临床关注点、费用和授权问题,以及这些互动的沟通方式:利用电子健康记录,我们确定了一个回顾性队列,其中包括 2017 年至 2018 年期间在初级保健诊所就诊时开具 OAB/UUI 治疗药物的 18-89 岁女性。我们检查了从最初处方到随后 15 个月的电子健康记录,以了解事先授权请求的记录以及患者对成本、副作用或无效的担忧。我们使用逻辑回归模型研究了患者人口统计学特征、合并症和药物类别与这些问题之间的关联:总体而言,46.2% 的患者(n = 123)有一个或多个 OAB/UUI 用药问题,其中 52 人在诊室外就诊。只有合并症较多的患者才会减少对任何类型药物的关注。尽管不同药物类型的患者报告问题的总体年龄百分比相似,但问题类型的模式却各不相同。与服用短效抗心律失常药的患者相比,服用长效抗心律失常药(奥昔布宁除外)的患者不太可能有副作用方面的顾虑(调整后的几率比为 0.35,95% CI 为 0.16-0.78),但更可能有费用方面的顾虑(调整后的几率比为 5.10,95% CI 为 1.53-17.03):患者对 OAB/UUI 药物的担忧在初级保健实践中很常见,并且经常在就诊之外报告。然而,不同类别的药物所引起的担忧(费用与副作用)也不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信