A comparative evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Upasna Bhatia, Fatema Burhan Khanbhaiwala, Nihal Prajapati, Ami Atodaria, Viren Sutariya, Hardik Bamania
{"title":"A comparative evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","authors":"Upasna Bhatia, Fatema Burhan Khanbhaiwala, Nihal Prajapati, Ami Atodaria, Viren Sutariya, Hardik Bamania","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_11_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetic agents alone or in combination with opioids, α2 agonists such as Dexmedetomidine have been found to reduce postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was designed to compare the better drug among Bupivacaine alone and Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine with respect to their analgesic efficacy and safety profile. in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was carried out on sixty patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II of either sex with ages ranging from 18 to 60 years posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia, equally divided into two groups, randomly allocated to one of the Groups using the table of randomization. Group B received Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine 40 ml 0.25% +5 ml normal saline and Group BD received Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine 40 ml 0.25% + Dexmedetomidine1 μg/kg diluted in 5 ml Normal saline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean heart rate and blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean) readings were significantly lower in Group BD than in Group B. The mean duration of analgesia in our study was longer in Group BD (7.5 ± 0.73 hours) when compared to Group B (5.9 ± 0.55 hours) with p-value & 0.0001 and CI 1.27 to 1.9, which was statistically significant. However, the post-operative analgesic requirement (rescue/demand) in Group B was clinically earlier and statistically significant as compared to Group BD. Postoperative VAS score ≥3 was considered the benchmark for providing rescue analgesia in the form of injection of Diclofenac 75 mg IV. In our study, we observed the pain scores via VAS/NRS at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 14 h, 16 h, 18 h, 20 h, 22 h and 24 h postoperatively. A comparison of pain scores from 30 min to 10hrs postoperatively showed a significant difference in both Groups with Group B having significantly higher VAS scores and lower VAS scores with Group BD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that there is a shorter duration of action of 0.25% Bupivacaine alone as compared to 0.25% Bupivacaine + Dexmedetomidine. Since the laparoscope is still inside the abdominal cavity the drugs are easy to administer with no adverse effects and with a good safety profile because of the visualization of drug deposition in the right place. Intraperitoneal instillation of Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia was very promising as a part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_11_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetic agents alone or in combination with opioids, α2 agonists such as Dexmedetomidine have been found to reduce postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was designed to compare the better drug among Bupivacaine alone and Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine with respect to their analgesic efficacy and safety profile. in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Patients and methods: The study was carried out on sixty patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II of either sex with ages ranging from 18 to 60 years posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia, equally divided into two groups, randomly allocated to one of the Groups using the table of randomization. Group B received Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine 40 ml 0.25% +5 ml normal saline and Group BD received Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine 40 ml 0.25% + Dexmedetomidine1 μg/kg diluted in 5 ml Normal saline.

Results: The mean heart rate and blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean) readings were significantly lower in Group BD than in Group B. The mean duration of analgesia in our study was longer in Group BD (7.5 ± 0.73 hours) when compared to Group B (5.9 ± 0.55 hours) with p-value & 0.0001 and CI 1.27 to 1.9, which was statistically significant. However, the post-operative analgesic requirement (rescue/demand) in Group B was clinically earlier and statistically significant as compared to Group BD. Postoperative VAS score ≥3 was considered the benchmark for providing rescue analgesia in the form of injection of Diclofenac 75 mg IV. In our study, we observed the pain scores via VAS/NRS at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 14 h, 16 h, 18 h, 20 h, 22 h and 24 h postoperatively. A comparison of pain scores from 30 min to 10hrs postoperatively showed a significant difference in both Groups with Group B having significantly higher VAS scores and lower VAS scores with Group BD.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that there is a shorter duration of action of 0.25% Bupivacaine alone as compared to 0.25% Bupivacaine + Dexmedetomidine. Since the laparoscope is still inside the abdominal cavity the drugs are easy to administer with no adverse effects and with a good safety profile because of the visualization of drug deposition in the right place. Intraperitoneal instillation of Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia was very promising as a part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后腹腔内单独使用布比卡因和布比卡因联合右美托咪定进行术后镇痛的比较评估。
简介:腹腔内单独或与阿片类药物、α2 受体激动剂(如右美托咪定)联合灌注局麻药可减轻腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的疼痛。本研究旨在比较单独使用布比卡因和布比卡因联合右美托咪定对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的镇痛效果和安全性:研究对象为 60 名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况 I-II 级的患者,男女不限,年龄在 18-60 岁之间,在全身麻醉下接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术,平均分为两组,使用随机分配表随机分配到其中一组。B 组腹腔注射 0.25% 布比卡因 40 ml + 5 ml 生理盐水,BD 组腹腔注射 0.25% 布比卡因 40 ml + 5 ml 生理盐水稀释的右美托咪定 1 μg/kg:BD 组的平均心率和血压(收缩压、舒张压和平均值)读数明显低于 B 组。与 B 组(5.9±0.55 小时)相比,BD 组的平均镇痛持续时间更长(7.5±0.73 小时),P 值为 0.0001,CI 为 1.27 至 1.9,具有统计学意义。然而,与 BD 组相比,B 组的术后镇痛需求(抢救/需求)更早,且具有统计学意义。术后 VAS 评分≥3 分被认为是以静脉注射双氯芬酸 75 毫克的形式提供抢救性镇痛的基准。在我们的研究中,我们观察了术后 30 分钟、1 小时、2 小时、4 小时、6 小时、8 小时、10 小时、12 小时、14 小时、16 小时、18 小时、20 小时、22 小时和 24 小时的 VAS/NRS 疼痛评分。术后 30 分钟至 10 小时的疼痛评分比较显示,两组的疼痛评分差异显著,B 组的 VAS 评分明显更高,而 BD 组的 VAS 评分较低:我们的研究表明,与 0.25% 布比卡因 + 右美托咪定相比,单用 0.25% 布比卡因的作用时间更短。由于腹腔镜仍在腹腔内,因此用药方便,无不良反应,而且由于可观察到药物在正确位置的沉积,因此安全性很高。作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术多模式镇痛的一部分,腹腔内灌注布比卡因和右美托咪定进行术后镇痛是非常有前景的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信