Assessing focal spot alignment in clinical linear accelerators: a comprehensive evaluation with triplet phantoms.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hans L Riis, Kenni H Engstrøm, Luke Slama, Joshua Dass, Martin A Ebert, Pejman Rowshanfarzad
{"title":"Assessing focal spot alignment in clinical linear accelerators: a comprehensive evaluation with triplet phantoms.","authors":"Hans L Riis, Kenni H Engstrøm, Luke Slama, Joshua Dass, Martin A Ebert, Pejman Rowshanfarzad","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01450-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A fundamental parameter to evaluate the beam delivery precision and stability on a clinical linear accelerator (linac) is the focal spot position (FSP) measured relative to the collimator axis of the radiation head. The aims of this work were to evaluate comprehensive data on FSP acquired on linacs in clinical use and to establish the ability of alternative phantoms to detect effects on patient plan delivery related to FSP. FSP measurements were conducted using a rigid phantom holding two ball-bearings at two different distances from the radiation source. Images of these ball-bearings were acquired using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) integrated with each linac. Machine QA was assessed using a radiation head-mounted PTW STARCHECK phantom. Patient plan QA was investigated using the SNC ArcCHECK phantom positioned on the treatment couch, irradiated with VMAT plans across a complete 360° gantry rotation and three X-ray energies. This study covered eight Elekta linacs, including those with 6 MV, 18 MV, and 6 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. The largest range in the FSP was found for 6 MV FFF. The FSP of one linac, retrofitted with 6 MV FFF, displayed substantial differences in FSP compared to 6 MV FFF beams on other linacs, which all had FSP ranges less than 0.50 mm and 0.25 mm in the lateral and longitudinal directions, respectively. The PTW STARCHECK phantom proved effective in characterising the FSP, while the SNC ArcCHECK measurements could not discern FSP-related features. Minor variations in FSP may be attributed to adjustments in linac parameters, component replacements necessary for beam delivery, and the wear and tear of various linac components, including the magnetron and gun filament. Consideration should be given to the ability of any particular phantom to detect a subsequent impact on the accuracy of patient plan delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01450-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental parameter to evaluate the beam delivery precision and stability on a clinical linear accelerator (linac) is the focal spot position (FSP) measured relative to the collimator axis of the radiation head. The aims of this work were to evaluate comprehensive data on FSP acquired on linacs in clinical use and to establish the ability of alternative phantoms to detect effects on patient plan delivery related to FSP. FSP measurements were conducted using a rigid phantom holding two ball-bearings at two different distances from the radiation source. Images of these ball-bearings were acquired using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) integrated with each linac. Machine QA was assessed using a radiation head-mounted PTW STARCHECK phantom. Patient plan QA was investigated using the SNC ArcCHECK phantom positioned on the treatment couch, irradiated with VMAT plans across a complete 360° gantry rotation and three X-ray energies. This study covered eight Elekta linacs, including those with 6 MV, 18 MV, and 6 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. The largest range in the FSP was found for 6 MV FFF. The FSP of one linac, retrofitted with 6 MV FFF, displayed substantial differences in FSP compared to 6 MV FFF beams on other linacs, which all had FSP ranges less than 0.50 mm and 0.25 mm in the lateral and longitudinal directions, respectively. The PTW STARCHECK phantom proved effective in characterising the FSP, while the SNC ArcCHECK measurements could not discern FSP-related features. Minor variations in FSP may be attributed to adjustments in linac parameters, component replacements necessary for beam delivery, and the wear and tear of various linac components, including the magnetron and gun filament. Consideration should be given to the ability of any particular phantom to detect a subsequent impact on the accuracy of patient plan delivery.

Abstract Image

评估临床直线加速器的焦斑对准情况:使用三重模型进行综合评估。
评估临床直线加速器(linac)光束传输精度和稳定性的一个基本参数是相对于辐射头准直器轴线测量的焦斑位置(FSP)。这项工作的目的是评估在临床使用的直线加速器上获得的有关 FSP 的综合数据,并确定替代模型检测与 FSP 有关的患者计划传输影响的能力。FSP 测量使用一个刚性模型,该模型与辐射源之间有两个不同距离,模型上有两个球轴承。使用与每台直列加速器集成的电子门成像装置(EPID)获取这些球轴承的图像。使用安装在辐射头的 PTW STARCHECK 模体对机器质量保证进行评估。病人计划的质量保证是使用安装在治疗床上的 SNC ArcCHECK 模型进行评估的,该模型使用 VMAT 计划进行 360° 完整龙门旋转和三种 X 射线能量照射。这项研究涵盖了八台 Elekta 直列加速器,包括 6 MV、18 MV 和 6 MV 无扁平化滤波 (FFF) 光束的直列加速器。6 MV FFF 的 FSP 范围最大。与其他直列加速器上的 6 MV 无平坦化滤波(FFF)光束相比,一台加装了 6 MV 无平坦化滤波(FFF)光束的直列加速器的 FSP 显示出巨大差异,其横向和纵向 FSP 范围分别小于 0.50 毫米和 0.25 毫米。事实证明,PTW STARCHECK 模型能有效描述 FSP 的特征,而 SNC ArcCHECK 测量则无法辨别与 FSP 相关的特征。FSP 的微小变化可归因于直列加速器参数的调整、光束传输所需的组件更换以及包括磁控管和枪丝在内的各种直列加速器组件的磨损。应考虑任何特定模型检测随后对患者计划传输准确性的影响的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信