Clinical Outcomes Associated With a Remote Postpartum Hypertension Monitoring Program.

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005665
Lara S Lemon, Beth Quinn, Anna Binstock, Jacob C Larkin, Hyagriv N Simhan, Alisse Hauspurg
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes Associated With a Remote Postpartum Hypertension Monitoring Program.","authors":"Lara S Lemon, Beth Quinn, Anna Binstock, Jacob C Larkin, Hyagriv N Simhan, Alisse Hauspurg","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate differences in health care utilization and guideline adherence for postpartum individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) who are engaged in a remote monitoring program, compared with usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of postpartum individuals with HDP who delivered between March 2019 and June 2023 at a single institution. The primary exposure was enrollment in a remote hypertension management program that relies on patient home blood pressure (BP) measurement and centralized nursing team management. Patients enrolled in the program were compared with those receiving usual care. Outcomes included postpartum readmission, office visit within 6 weeks postpartum, BP measurement within 10 days, and initiation of antihypertensive medication. We performed multivariable logistic and conditional regression in a propensity score matched cohort. Propensity scores, generated by modeling likelihood of program participation, were assessed for even distribution by group, ensuring standardized bias of less than 10% after matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 12,038 eligible individuals (6,556 participants, 5,482 in the control group) were included. Program participants were more likely to be White, commercially insured, be diagnosed with preeclampsia, and have higher prenatal and inpatient postpartum BPs. Differences in baseline factors were well-balanced after implementation of propensity score. Program enrollment was associated with lower 6-week postpartum readmission rates, demonstrating 1 fewer readmission for every 100 individuals in the program (propensity score-matched adjusted risk difference [aRD] -1.5, 95% CI, -2.6 to -0.46; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.78, 95% CI, 0.65-0.93). For every 100 individuals enrolled in the program, 85 more had a BP recorded within 10 days (propensity score-matched aRD 85.4, 95% CI, 84.3-86.6), and six more had a 6-week postpartum office visit (propensity score-matched aRD 5.7, 95% CI, 3.9-7.6). Program enrollment was also associated with increased initiation of an antihypertensive medication postpartum (propensity score-matched aRR 4.44, 95% CI, 3.88-5.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participation in a postpartum remote BP monitoring program was associated with fewer postpartum hospital readmissions, higher attendance at postpartum visits, improved guideline adherence, and higher rates of antihypertensive use.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate differences in health care utilization and guideline adherence for postpartum individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) who are engaged in a remote monitoring program, compared with usual care.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of postpartum individuals with HDP who delivered between March 2019 and June 2023 at a single institution. The primary exposure was enrollment in a remote hypertension management program that relies on patient home blood pressure (BP) measurement and centralized nursing team management. Patients enrolled in the program were compared with those receiving usual care. Outcomes included postpartum readmission, office visit within 6 weeks postpartum, BP measurement within 10 days, and initiation of antihypertensive medication. We performed multivariable logistic and conditional regression in a propensity score matched cohort. Propensity scores, generated by modeling likelihood of program participation, were assessed for even distribution by group, ensuring standardized bias of less than 10% after matching.

Results: Overall, 12,038 eligible individuals (6,556 participants, 5,482 in the control group) were included. Program participants were more likely to be White, commercially insured, be diagnosed with preeclampsia, and have higher prenatal and inpatient postpartum BPs. Differences in baseline factors were well-balanced after implementation of propensity score. Program enrollment was associated with lower 6-week postpartum readmission rates, demonstrating 1 fewer readmission for every 100 individuals in the program (propensity score-matched adjusted risk difference [aRD] -1.5, 95% CI, -2.6 to -0.46; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.78, 95% CI, 0.65-0.93). For every 100 individuals enrolled in the program, 85 more had a BP recorded within 10 days (propensity score-matched aRD 85.4, 95% CI, 84.3-86.6), and six more had a 6-week postpartum office visit (propensity score-matched aRD 5.7, 95% CI, 3.9-7.6). Program enrollment was also associated with increased initiation of an antihypertensive medication postpartum (propensity score-matched aRR 4.44, 95% CI, 3.88-5.07).

Conclusion: Participation in a postpartum remote BP monitoring program was associated with fewer postpartum hospital readmissions, higher attendance at postpartum visits, improved guideline adherence, and higher rates of antihypertensive use.

与远程产后高血压监测计划相关的临床结果。
目的评估参与远程监测项目的妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)产后患者在使用医疗服务和遵守指南方面与常规护理的差异:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2019 年 3 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在一家医疗机构分娩的妊娠高血压疾病产后患者。主要暴露因素是加入了远程高血压管理项目,该项目依赖于患者的家庭血压测量和护理团队的集中管理。参加该计划的患者与接受常规护理的患者进行了比较。结果包括产后再次入院、产后 6 周内就诊、10 天内测量血压以及开始服用降压药。我们在倾向得分匹配队列中进行了多变量逻辑回归和条件回归。通过对参与计划的可能性进行建模而生成的倾向分数,在进行匹配后,对各组的均匀分布进行了评估,以确保标准化偏差小于 10%:总共有 12,038 名符合条件的个人(6,556 名参与者,5,482 名对照组)被纳入计划。该计划的参与者多为白人、有商业保险、被诊断为子痫前期、产前和产后血压较高。采用倾向评分后,基线因素的差异得到了很好的平衡。加入该计划可降低产后 6 周再入院率,每 100 人加入该计划可减少 1 例再入院(倾向得分匹配调整风险差异 [aRD] -1.5, 95% CI, -2.6 to -0.46;调整风险比 [aRR] 0.78, 95% CI, 0.65-0.93)。每有 100 人参加该计划,10 天内记录血压的人数就会增加 85 人(倾向得分匹配的 aRD 为 85.4,95% CI 为 84.3-86.6),产后 6 周门诊的人数就会增加 6 人(倾向得分匹配的 aRD 为 5.7,95% CI 为 3.9-7.6)。参加该计划还与产后开始服用降压药的人数增加有关(倾向得分匹配 aRR 4.44,95% CI,3.88-5.07):结论:参与产后远程血压监测计划与产后再入院率降低、产后就诊率提高、指南依从性改善以及抗高血压药物使用率提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信