The Diagnostic Utility of Cervical Spine Proprioception for Adolescent Concussion.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Katherine L Smulligan, Samantha N Magliato, Carson L Keeter, Mathew J Wingerson, Andrew C Smith, Julie C Wilson, David R Howell
{"title":"The Diagnostic Utility of Cervical Spine Proprioception for Adolescent Concussion.","authors":"Katherine L Smulligan, Samantha N Magliato, Carson L Keeter, Mathew J Wingerson, Andrew C Smith, Julie C Wilson, David R Howell","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical spine proprioception may be impaired after concussion. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic utility of cervical spine proprioception for adolescent concussion.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adolescents ≤18 days of concussion and uninjured controls.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>N/A.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Head repositioning accuracy (HRA) testing, a measure of cervical spine proprioception. The HRA test involved patients relocating their head back to a neutral starting position with eyes closed after maximal cervical spine flexion, extension, and right and left rotations. The overall HRA error score was the mean error (distance from the starting point to self-reported return to neutral) across 12 trials: 3 trials in each direction. We used t-tests to compare group means and logistic regression (outcome = group, predictor = HRA, covariates) to calculate odds ratios. We used a receiver operator characteristic curve to evaluate area under the curve (AUC) and calculate the optimal HRA cutpoint to distinguish concussion from controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled and tested 46 participants with concussion (age = 15.8 ± 1.3 years, 59% female, mean = 11.3 ± 3.3 days postconcussion) and 83 uninjured controls (age = 16.1 ± 1.4 years, 88% female). The concussion group had significantly worse HRA than controls (4.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.9 ± 0.7 degrees, P < 0.001, Cohen d = 1.19). The univariable HRA model AUC was 0.81 (95% CI = 0.73, 0.90). After adjusting for age, sex, and concussion history, the multivariable model AUC improved to 0.85 (95% CI = 0.77, 0.92). The model correctly classified 80% of participants as concussion/control at a 3.5-degree cutpoint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescents with concussion demonstrated worse cervical spine proprioception than uninjured controls. Head repositioning accuracy may offer diagnostic utility for subacute concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cervical spine proprioception may be impaired after concussion. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic utility of cervical spine proprioception for adolescent concussion.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Research laboratory.

Participants: Adolescents ≤18 days of concussion and uninjured controls.

Interventions: N/A.

Main outcomes: Head repositioning accuracy (HRA) testing, a measure of cervical spine proprioception. The HRA test involved patients relocating their head back to a neutral starting position with eyes closed after maximal cervical spine flexion, extension, and right and left rotations. The overall HRA error score was the mean error (distance from the starting point to self-reported return to neutral) across 12 trials: 3 trials in each direction. We used t-tests to compare group means and logistic regression (outcome = group, predictor = HRA, covariates) to calculate odds ratios. We used a receiver operator characteristic curve to evaluate area under the curve (AUC) and calculate the optimal HRA cutpoint to distinguish concussion from controls.

Results: We enrolled and tested 46 participants with concussion (age = 15.8 ± 1.3 years, 59% female, mean = 11.3 ± 3.3 days postconcussion) and 83 uninjured controls (age = 16.1 ± 1.4 years, 88% female). The concussion group had significantly worse HRA than controls (4.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.9 ± 0.7 degrees, P < 0.001, Cohen d = 1.19). The univariable HRA model AUC was 0.81 (95% CI = 0.73, 0.90). After adjusting for age, sex, and concussion history, the multivariable model AUC improved to 0.85 (95% CI = 0.77, 0.92). The model correctly classified 80% of participants as concussion/control at a 3.5-degree cutpoint.

Conclusions: Adolescents with concussion demonstrated worse cervical spine proprioception than uninjured controls. Head repositioning accuracy may offer diagnostic utility for subacute concussion.

颈椎运动感觉对青少年脑震荡的诊断效用。
目的:颈椎本体感觉可能在脑震荡后受损。我们的目的是确定颈椎本体感觉对青少年脑震荡的诊断作用:设计:横断面:研究实验室:干预措施:不适用:主要结果主要结果:头部复位准确性(HRA)测试,这是一种颈椎本体感觉的测量方法。HRA测试包括患者在颈椎最大限度屈曲、伸展和左右旋转后,闭眼将头部移回中立起始位置。HRA 误差总分是 12 次试验的平均误差(从起点到自我报告的恢复中立位置的距离):每个方向各进行 3 次试验。我们使用 t 检验来比较各组的平均值,并使用逻辑回归(结果 = 组,预测因子 = HRA,协变量)来计算几率比。我们使用受体运算特征曲线来评估曲线下面积(AUC),并计算出区分脑震荡和对照组的最佳 HRA 切点:我们招募并测试了 46 名脑震荡患者(年龄 = 15.8 ± 1.3 岁,59% 为女性,脑震荡后平均 = 11.3 ± 3.3 天)和 83 名未受伤的对照组患者(年龄 = 16.1 ± 1.4 岁,88% 为女性)。脑震荡组的 HRA 明显低于对照组(4.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.9 ± 0.7 度,P < 0.001,Cohen d = 1.19)。单变量 HRA 模型 AUC 为 0.81(95% CI = 0.73,0.90)。在对年龄、性别和脑震荡病史进行调整后,多变量模型的AUC提高到0.85(95% CI = 0.77, 0.92)。在3.5度的切点上,该模型正确地将80%的参与者划分为脑震荡/对照组:结论:与未受伤的对照组相比,患有脑震荡的青少年颈椎本体感觉较差。头部重新定位的准确性可能对亚急性脑震荡有诊断作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信