Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection at one hospital 10 years after an outbreak of the epidemic C. difficile strain BI/027: changing strain prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and patient antibiotic exposures.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-08-07 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1128/aac.00698-24
Jeffrey T Wieczorkiewicz, Andrew M Skinner, Adam Cheknis, Laurica A Petrella, Vanessa W Stevens, Lorinda M Wright, Dale N Gerding, Stuart Johnson
{"title":"Epidemiology of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection at one hospital 10 years after an outbreak of the epidemic <i>C. difficile</i> strain BI/027: changing strain prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and patient antibiotic exposures.","authors":"Jeffrey T Wieczorkiewicz, Andrew M Skinner, Adam Cheknis, Laurica A Petrella, Vanessa W Stevens, Lorinda M Wright, Dale N Gerding, Stuart Johnson","doi":"10.1128/aac.00698-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In contrast to the epidemiology 10 years earlier at our hospital when the epidemic restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group strain BI accounted for 72% of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> isolates recovered from first-episode <i>C. difficile</i> infection (CDI) cases, BI represented 19% of first-episode CDI isolates in 2013-2015. Two additional REA group strains accounted for 31% of isolates (Y, 16%; DH, 12%). High-level resistance to fluoroquinolones and azithromycin was more common among BI isolates than among DH, Y, and non-BI/DH/Y isolates. Multivariable analysis revealed that BI cases were 2.47 times more likely to be associated with fluoroquinolone exposure compared to non-BI cases (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-5.46). In addition, the odds of developing a CDI after third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin exposure was 2.83 times for DH cases than for non-DH cases (95% CI: 1.06-7.54). Fluoroquinolone use in the hospital decreased from 2005 to 2015 from a peak of 113 to a low of 56 antimicrobial days/1,000 patient days. In contrast, cephalosporin use increased from 42 to 81 antimicrobial days/1,000 patient days. These changes correlated with a decrease in geometric mean MIC for ciprofloxacin (61.03 to 42.65 mg/L, <i>P</i> = 0.02) and an increase in geometric mean MIC for ceftriaxone (40.87 to 86.14 mg/L, <i>P</i> < 0.01) among BI isolates. The BI strain remained resistant to fluoroquinolones, but an overall decrease in fluoroquinolone use and increase in cephalosporin use were associated with a decrease in the prevalence of BI, an increased diversity of <i>C. difficile</i> strain types, and the emergence of strains DH and Y.</p>","PeriodicalId":8152,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00698-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contrast to the epidemiology 10 years earlier at our hospital when the epidemic restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group strain BI accounted for 72% of Clostridioides difficile isolates recovered from first-episode C. difficile infection (CDI) cases, BI represented 19% of first-episode CDI isolates in 2013-2015. Two additional REA group strains accounted for 31% of isolates (Y, 16%; DH, 12%). High-level resistance to fluoroquinolones and azithromycin was more common among BI isolates than among DH, Y, and non-BI/DH/Y isolates. Multivariable analysis revealed that BI cases were 2.47 times more likely to be associated with fluoroquinolone exposure compared to non-BI cases (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-5.46). In addition, the odds of developing a CDI after third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin exposure was 2.83 times for DH cases than for non-DH cases (95% CI: 1.06-7.54). Fluoroquinolone use in the hospital decreased from 2005 to 2015 from a peak of 113 to a low of 56 antimicrobial days/1,000 patient days. In contrast, cephalosporin use increased from 42 to 81 antimicrobial days/1,000 patient days. These changes correlated with a decrease in geometric mean MIC for ciprofloxacin (61.03 to 42.65 mg/L, P = 0.02) and an increase in geometric mean MIC for ceftriaxone (40.87 to 86.14 mg/L, P < 0.01) among BI isolates. The BI strain remained resistant to fluoroquinolones, but an overall decrease in fluoroquinolone use and increase in cephalosporin use were associated with a decrease in the prevalence of BI, an increased diversity of C. difficile strain types, and the emergence of strains DH and Y.

艰难梭菌菌株 BI/027 流行爆发 10 年后一家医院的艰难梭菌感染流行病学:菌株流行率、抗菌药敏感性和患者抗生素暴露量的变化。
10年前,本医院流行的限制性内切酶分析(REA)组菌株BI占从首次发病的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)病例中分离出的艰难梭菌的72%,而2013-2015年,BI占首次发病的艰难梭菌感染分离株的19%。另外两种 REA 组菌株占分离株的 31%(Y,16%;DH,12%)。与DH、Y和非BI/DH/Y分离株相比,BI分离株对氟喹诺酮类药物和阿奇霉素的高水平耐药性更为常见。多变量分析显示,与非 BI 病例相比,BI 病例接触氟喹诺酮类药物的几率是后者的 2.47 倍(95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.12-5.46)。此外,与非 DH 病例相比,DH 病例在接触第三代或第四代头孢菌素后患 CDI 的几率是后者的 2.83 倍(95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.06-7.54)。从 2005 年到 2015 年,医院中氟喹诺酮类药物的使用量从高峰期的 113 天减少到最低的 56 天/1,000 个患者日。相比之下,头孢菌素的使用量从 42 个抗菌药物日/1,000 个患者日增加到 81 个抗菌药物日/1,000 个患者日。这些变化与 BI 分离物中环丙沙星的几何平均 MIC 值下降(61.03 至 42.65 mg/L,P = 0.02)和头孢曲松的几何平均 MIC 值上升(40.87 至 86.14 mg/L,P < 0.01)相关。BI 菌株仍对氟喹诺酮类药物耐药,但氟喹诺酮类药物使用的总体减少和头孢菌素使用的增加与 BI 感染率的下降、艰难梭菌菌株类型多样性的增加以及 DH 和 Y 菌株的出现有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
762
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (AAC) features interdisciplinary studies that build our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic applications of antimicrobial and antiparasitic agents and chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信