Advancing equitable partnerships: frontline community visions for coastal resiliency knowledge co-production, social cohesion, and environmental justice

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Aya Morris , Bernadette Baird-Zars , Victoria Sanders , Paul Gallay , Jacqueline M. Klopp , Annel Hernandez , Lexi Scanlon , Hannah Su-An Lin
{"title":"Advancing equitable partnerships: frontline community visions for coastal resiliency knowledge co-production, social cohesion, and environmental justice","authors":"Aya Morris ,&nbsp;Bernadette Baird-Zars ,&nbsp;Victoria Sanders ,&nbsp;Paul Gallay ,&nbsp;Jacqueline M. Klopp ,&nbsp;Annel Hernandez ,&nbsp;Lexi Scanlon ,&nbsp;Hannah Su-An Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Community-based organizations (CBOs) in frontline coastal communities grapple with social and environmental injustices compounded by climate change risks. In response, CBOs have developed deep expertise in climate adaptation tailored to their local communities. Yet these groups are often effectively excluded from resilience planning processes that are top-down and involve perfunctory and often performative consultations. This paper asks: What do community leaders seek from adaptation planning, and how do they recommend such processes be improved? Drawing on the experiences of ten CBOs in coastal New York and New Jersey, the majority representing BIPOC environmental justice communities, this article advances community-driven priorities for coastal resilience planning outcomes and processes. We conducted structured 60–90-minute interviews with ten CBO leaders between February-March 2022, collaboratively completed an iterative content analysis of the interview data and community plans, and workshopped core findings in multiple sessions and conversations with participating CBOs through early 2024. CBO leaders had consensus on resilience planning priorities: they oppose top-down approaches where planners bring a predetermined agenda, and seek true partnership through a relational approach that values grassroots perspectives to co-produce equitable and just strategies to address climate risk. Recommendations for decision-makers center on the need to build on existing community-led plans, invest in community leadership within planning processes, act with transparency to foster trust, partnership and co-planning with communities, and self-evaluate their practice. Lessons for researchers seeking to support community leadership within resilience planning include the need to establish lasting and mutually supportive relationships with community partners to enable knowledge co-production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 104051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852400112X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community-based organizations (CBOs) in frontline coastal communities grapple with social and environmental injustices compounded by climate change risks. In response, CBOs have developed deep expertise in climate adaptation tailored to their local communities. Yet these groups are often effectively excluded from resilience planning processes that are top-down and involve perfunctory and often performative consultations. This paper asks: What do community leaders seek from adaptation planning, and how do they recommend such processes be improved? Drawing on the experiences of ten CBOs in coastal New York and New Jersey, the majority representing BIPOC environmental justice communities, this article advances community-driven priorities for coastal resilience planning outcomes and processes. We conducted structured 60–90-minute interviews with ten CBO leaders between February-March 2022, collaboratively completed an iterative content analysis of the interview data and community plans, and workshopped core findings in multiple sessions and conversations with participating CBOs through early 2024. CBO leaders had consensus on resilience planning priorities: they oppose top-down approaches where planners bring a predetermined agenda, and seek true partnership through a relational approach that values grassroots perspectives to co-produce equitable and just strategies to address climate risk. Recommendations for decision-makers center on the need to build on existing community-led plans, invest in community leadership within planning processes, act with transparency to foster trust, partnership and co-planning with communities, and self-evaluate their practice. Lessons for researchers seeking to support community leadership within resilience planning include the need to establish lasting and mutually supportive relationships with community partners to enable knowledge co-production.

推进公平的伙伴关系:一线社区对沿海复原力知识共同生产、社会凝聚力和环境正义的愿景
沿海一线社区的社区组织(CBOs)努力应对因气候变化风险而加剧的社会和环境不公。为此,社区组织在适应当地社区气候方面积累了深厚的专业知识。然而,这些团体往往被有效地排除在抗灾规划进程之外,这些进程是自上而下的,涉及敷衍了事且往往是表演性的磋商。本文提出以下问题:社区领导人希望从适应规划中获得什么,他们建议如何改进这些进程?本文借鉴了纽约和新泽西沿海地区十个社区组织的经验,其中大多数代表了黑人、印地安人和阿拉斯加原住民的环境正义社区。2022 年 2 月至 3 月间,我们对十个社区组织的领导者进行了 60-90 分钟的结构化访谈,共同完成了对访谈数据和社区计划的迭代内容分析,并在 2024 年初与参与的社区组织进行了多次会议和对话,对核心发现进行了研讨。社区组织领导者就抗灾规划的优先事项达成了共识:他们反对规划者带来预定议程的自上而下的方法,而是通过重视基层观点的关系型方法寻求真正的合作伙伴关系,共同制定公平、公正的战略来应对气候风险。对决策者的建议主要集中在需要以现有的社区主导计划为基础,在规划过程中对社区领导力进行投资,以透明的方式促进与社区的信任、伙伴关系和共同规划,并对其实践进行自我评估。对于寻求支持社区在抗灾规划中发挥领导作用的研究人员来说,所应汲取的经验教训包括需要与社区合作伙伴建立持久、相互支持的关系,以实现知识的共同生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信