Re-irradiation to the prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive radiotherapy – A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent trials
Christina Schröder , Hongjian Tang , Bianca Lenffer , André Buchali , Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen , Robert Förster , Paul Windisch
{"title":"Re-irradiation to the prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive radiotherapy – A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent trials","authors":"Christina Schröder , Hongjian Tang , Bianca Lenffer , André Buchali , Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen , Robert Förster , Paul Windisch","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is increasing data on re-irradiation to the prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with increasing evidence on prostate re-irradiation using a C-arm LINAC or an MR LINAC in recent years. We therefore conducted this systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis on prostate re-irradiation including studies published from 2020 to 2023, to serve as an update on existing <em>meta</em>-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched the PubMed and Embase databases in October 2023 with queries including combinations of “repeat”, “radiotherapy”, “prostate”, “re-irradiation”, “reirradiation”, “re treatment”, “SBRT”, “retreatment”. Publication date was set to be from 2020 to 2023. There was no limitation regarding language. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. After data extraction, heterogeneity testing was done by calculating the I<sup>2</sup>. A random effects model with a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was used to estimate the combined effect. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed visually and using Egger’s test to estimate the presence of publication and/or small study bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>14 publications were included in the systematic review. The rates of acute ≥ grade 2 (G2) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities reported in the included studies ranged from 0.0-30.0 % and 0.0–25.0 % respectively. For late ≥ G2 GU and GI toxicity, the ranges are 4.0–51.8 % and 0.0–25.0 %. The pooled rate of acute GU and GI toxicity ≥ G2 were 13 % (95 % CI: 7–18 %) and 2 % (95 % CI: 0–4 %). For late GU and GI toxicity ≥ G2 the pooled rates were 25 % (95 % CI: 14–35 %) and 5 % (95 % CI: 1–9 %). The pooled 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 72 % (95 % CI: 64–92 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>SBRT in the re-irradiation of radiorecurrent prostate cancer is safe and effective. Further prospective data are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000831/pdfft?md5=e16d1d76635dd6c9db3e3618043bcaeb&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000831-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is increasing data on re-irradiation to the prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with increasing evidence on prostate re-irradiation using a C-arm LINAC or an MR LINAC in recent years. We therefore conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on prostate re-irradiation including studies published from 2020 to 2023, to serve as an update on existing meta-analysis.
Methods
We searched the PubMed and Embase databases in October 2023 with queries including combinations of “repeat”, “radiotherapy”, “prostate”, “re-irradiation”, “reirradiation”, “re treatment”, “SBRT”, “retreatment”. Publication date was set to be from 2020 to 2023. There was no limitation regarding language. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. After data extraction, heterogeneity testing was done by calculating the I2. A random effects model with a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was used to estimate the combined effect. Funnel plot asymmetry was assessed visually and using Egger’s test to estimate the presence of publication and/or small study bias.
Results
14 publications were included in the systematic review. The rates of acute ≥ grade 2 (G2) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities reported in the included studies ranged from 0.0-30.0 % and 0.0–25.0 % respectively. For late ≥ G2 GU and GI toxicity, the ranges are 4.0–51.8 % and 0.0–25.0 %. The pooled rate of acute GU and GI toxicity ≥ G2 were 13 % (95 % CI: 7–18 %) and 2 % (95 % CI: 0–4 %). For late GU and GI toxicity ≥ G2 the pooled rates were 25 % (95 % CI: 14–35 %) and 5 % (95 % CI: 1–9 %). The pooled 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 72 % (95 % CI: 64–92 %).
Conclusions
SBRT in the re-irradiation of radiorecurrent prostate cancer is safe and effective. Further prospective data are warranted.