Identifying the potential for increasing cycling in Denmark: Factors associated with short-distance and long-distance commuter cycling

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tanja Schmidt, Trine Top Klein-Wengel, Lars Breum Christiansen, Karsten Elmose-Østerlund, Jasper Schipperijn
{"title":"Identifying the potential for increasing cycling in Denmark: Factors associated with short-distance and long-distance commuter cycling","authors":"Tanja Schmidt,&nbsp;Trine Top Klein-Wengel,&nbsp;Lars Breum Christiansen,&nbsp;Karsten Elmose-Østerlund,&nbsp;Jasper Schipperijn","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Increasing transportation cycling is an effective initiative toward better population health. The aim was to describe differences between less and more frequent cyclists, and to identify factors associated with transportation cycling for people with short and long distances to work or education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study is based on data from approximately 46,000 respondents from a Danish cross-sectional survey conducted in 2020. The survey included questions on active transportation, barriers, and social background. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed for two groups of less and more frequent cyclists: short distance (1–5 km) and long distance (6–15 km).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 49.3% of those living within a short distance and 73.0% of those living within a long distance cycled two or fewer days a week to work or education. The odds of cycling more often were significantly higher for individuals aged 15–29, women, higher-educated people, students, people with Danish ethnicity, those with daily access to a bike, people living with children, and those in the municipality area. The odds of cycling more often were significantly lower for people who identified time, physical appearance, safety issues, capabilities, and a preference for car driving as barriers to more active transportation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study shows that there are geographical differences within Denmark that affect cycling Rates, despite the country being categorized as a cycling nation. People living in rural areas are less likely to cycle to work or education despite having the same commuting distances as people living in the cities. This is surprising and should be further investigated to identify potential infrastructural, cultural, or interpersonal factors that may promote more commuter cycling among people living in rural areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524001166/pdfft?md5=a39f166bcb8138abb9ded6d26c534e3c&pid=1-s2.0-S2214140524001166-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524001166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Increasing transportation cycling is an effective initiative toward better population health. The aim was to describe differences between less and more frequent cyclists, and to identify factors associated with transportation cycling for people with short and long distances to work or education.

Methods

The study is based on data from approximately 46,000 respondents from a Danish cross-sectional survey conducted in 2020. The survey included questions on active transportation, barriers, and social background. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were performed for two groups of less and more frequent cyclists: short distance (1–5 km) and long distance (6–15 km).

Results

Overall, 49.3% of those living within a short distance and 73.0% of those living within a long distance cycled two or fewer days a week to work or education. The odds of cycling more often were significantly higher for individuals aged 15–29, women, higher-educated people, students, people with Danish ethnicity, those with daily access to a bike, people living with children, and those in the municipality area. The odds of cycling more often were significantly lower for people who identified time, physical appearance, safety issues, capabilities, and a preference for car driving as barriers to more active transportation.

Conclusions

This study shows that there are geographical differences within Denmark that affect cycling Rates, despite the country being categorized as a cycling nation. People living in rural areas are less likely to cycle to work or education despite having the same commuting distances as people living in the cities. This is surprising and should be further investigated to identify potential infrastructural, cultural, or interpersonal factors that may promote more commuter cycling among people living in rural areas.

确定丹麦增加骑自行车出行的潜力:与短途和长途通勤自行车相关的因素
导言增加交通自行车的使用是改善人口健康的有效措施。本研究的目的是描述骑自行车较少的人和骑自行车较多的人之间的差异,并确定与上班或上学距离较短和较长的人骑自行车出行相关的因素。调查包括有关积极交通、障碍和社会背景的问题。结果总体而言,49.3%的短距离居民和 73.0%的长距离居民每周骑自行车上班或上学的天数分别为两天或两天以下。15-29岁、女性、受过高等教育的人、学生、丹麦裔、每天都能骑自行车的人、与孩子住在一起的人以及市辖区内的人更经常骑自行车的几率明显更高。对于那些认为时间、外貌、安全问题、能力和更喜欢开车是更积极交通的障碍的人来说,更经常骑自行车的几率要低得多。结论这项研究表明,尽管丹麦被归类为骑自行车的国家,但丹麦国内的地理差异影响了骑自行车的比率。尽管通勤距离与城市居民相同,但生活在农村地区的人骑自行车上班或上学的可能性较低。这一点令人惊讶,应进一步调查,以确定可能促进农村地区居民更多地骑车通勤的潜在基础设施、文化或人际因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信