Analytical assessment of pullout capacity of reinforcements in unsaturated soils

Abstract

The effective interaction mechanisms in the pullout resistance of reinforcements include skin friction mobilized at the soil-solid surface, soil-soil shear resistance, and compressive resistance created against transverse elements. The third component is obtained from passive lateral pressure (LPM) or bearing capacity (BCM) methods. An analytical solution is proposed to determine the pullout capacity of geocell, geogrid, and strengthened geogrids embedded in ordinary and unsaturated soils. For unsaturated soils, the effective stress approach was employed. The solution-predicted results were compared with those obtained from large-scale pullout tests reported in the literature. Results indicated that considering LPM for 2D and 3D reinforcements better agrees with experimental results. The mobilized frictional rib-soil interfaces and the soil-soil shear resistance components generally contribute more to the pullout capacity of the geocell and geogrid, respectively. For the extensibility represented by $m_{pi}$ and flexibility of geocell denoted by ${\alpha }_{pi}$, the values of $m_{pi}$ = 1, 0.7, and 0.3 for the first, second, and third row of geocell, ${\alpha }_{pi}=$ 0.4 for the first row of geocell and 0.25 for the second and subsequent rows are suggested to be considered. Parametric studies showed that the optimum transverse rib spacing is over 50 times the equivalent rib thickness (B_eq).