A Simulation-Free Replacement Solution for Radiation Therapy Immobilization Devices Using Computer Numerical Control (CNC) -Milled Polystyrene Molds

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Samuel Hellman PhD , Laszlo Voros MS , Victoria Y. Yu PhD , Dale M. Lovelock PhD , Sean Berry PhD , Lei Zhang PhD , Margie Hunt MS , Joseph O. Deasy PhD , Laura Cervino PhD
{"title":"A Simulation-Free Replacement Solution for Radiation Therapy Immobilization Devices Using Computer Numerical Control (CNC) -Milled Polystyrene Molds","authors":"Samuel Hellman PhD ,&nbsp;Laszlo Voros MS ,&nbsp;Victoria Y. Yu PhD ,&nbsp;Dale M. Lovelock PhD ,&nbsp;Sean Berry PhD ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Margie Hunt MS ,&nbsp;Joseph O. Deasy PhD ,&nbsp;Laura Cervino PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In radiation therapy (RT), if an immobilization device is lost or damaged, the patient may need to be brought back for resimulation, device fabrication, and treatment planning, causing additional imaging radiation exposure, inconvenience, cost, and delay. We describe a simulation-free method for replacing lost or damaged RT immobilization devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>Replacement immobilization devices were fabricated using existing simulation scans as design templates by computer numerical control (CNC) milling of molds made from extruded polystyrene (XPS). XPS material attenuation and bolusing properties were evaluated, a standard workflow was established, and 12 patients were treated. Setup reproducibility was analyzed postfacto using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) calculations comparing onboard treatment imaging with computed tomography (CT) simulations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results showed that XPS foam material had less dosimetric impact (attenuation and bolusing) than materials used for our standard immobilization devices. The average direct cost to produce each replacement mold was $242.17, compared with over $2000 for standard resimulation. Hands-on time to manufacture was 86.3 minutes, whereas molds were delivered in as little as 4 hours and mostly within 24 hours, compared with a week or more required for standard resimulation. Each mold was optically scanned after production and was measured to be within 2-mm tolerance (pointwise displacement) of design input. All patients were successfully treated using the CNC-milled foam mold replacements, and pretreatment imaging verified satisfactory clinical setup reproduction for each case. The external body contours from the setup cone beam CT and the original CT simulation with matching superior-inferior extent were compared by calculating the DSC and MDA. DSC average was 0.966 (SD, 0.011), and MDA average was 2.694 mm (SD, 0.986).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CNC milling of XPS foam is a quicker and more convenient solution than traditional resimulation for replacing lost or damaged RT immobilization devices. Satisfactory patient immobilization, low dosimetric impact compared with standard immobilization devices, and strong correlation of onboard contours with CT simulations are shown. We share our clinical experience, workflow, and manufacturing guide to help other clinicians who may want to adopt this solution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 8","pages":"Article 101544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001076/pdfft?md5=65a237c1b6cd6e04708b4dc805634c32&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001076-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In radiation therapy (RT), if an immobilization device is lost or damaged, the patient may need to be brought back for resimulation, device fabrication, and treatment planning, causing additional imaging radiation exposure, inconvenience, cost, and delay. We describe a simulation-free method for replacing lost or damaged RT immobilization devices.

Methods and Materials

Replacement immobilization devices were fabricated using existing simulation scans as design templates by computer numerical control (CNC) milling of molds made from extruded polystyrene (XPS). XPS material attenuation and bolusing properties were evaluated, a standard workflow was established, and 12 patients were treated. Setup reproducibility was analyzed postfacto using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) calculations comparing onboard treatment imaging with computed tomography (CT) simulations.

Results

Results showed that XPS foam material had less dosimetric impact (attenuation and bolusing) than materials used for our standard immobilization devices. The average direct cost to produce each replacement mold was $242.17, compared with over $2000 for standard resimulation. Hands-on time to manufacture was 86.3 minutes, whereas molds were delivered in as little as 4 hours and mostly within 24 hours, compared with a week or more required for standard resimulation. Each mold was optically scanned after production and was measured to be within 2-mm tolerance (pointwise displacement) of design input. All patients were successfully treated using the CNC-milled foam mold replacements, and pretreatment imaging verified satisfactory clinical setup reproduction for each case. The external body contours from the setup cone beam CT and the original CT simulation with matching superior-inferior extent were compared by calculating the DSC and MDA. DSC average was 0.966 (SD, 0.011), and MDA average was 2.694 mm (SD, 0.986).

Conclusions

CNC milling of XPS foam is a quicker and more convenient solution than traditional resimulation for replacing lost or damaged RT immobilization devices. Satisfactory patient immobilization, low dosimetric impact compared with standard immobilization devices, and strong correlation of onboard contours with CT simulations are shown. We share our clinical experience, workflow, and manufacturing guide to help other clinicians who may want to adopt this solution.

使用计算机数控(CNC)铣削聚苯乙烯模具的放射治疗固定装置无仿真替换解决方案
目的在放射治疗(RT)中,如果固定装置丢失或损坏,患者可能需要被带回进行重新模拟、装置制作和治疗计划,从而造成额外的成像辐射暴露、不便、成本和延误。我们介绍了一种用于替换丢失或损坏的 RT 固定装置的免模拟方法。方法和材料使用现有的模拟扫描结果作为设计模板,通过计算机数控(CNC)铣削挤压聚苯乙烯(XPS)制成的模具来制作替换固定装置。对 XPS 材料的衰减和栓塞特性进行了评估,建立了标准工作流程,并对 12 名患者进行了治疗。使用戴斯相似系数(DSC)和平均一致距离(MDA)计算法对机载治疗成像与计算机断层扫描(CT)模拟进行比较,事后分析了设置的可重复性。生产每个替换模具的平均直接成本为 242.17 美元,而标准重塑的成本超过 2000 美元。生产所需的实际操作时间为 86.3 分钟,而模具的交付时间最短为 4 小时,大部分在 24 小时内完成,相比之下,标准重塑需要一周或更长时间。每个模具在生产后都进行了光学扫描,测量结果显示与设计输入值的误差(点向位移)在 2 毫米以内。所有患者都使用数控加工的泡沫模具替代物成功进行了治疗,预处理成像验证了每个病例的临床设置再现令人满意。通过计算 DSC 和 MDA,比较了设置锥束 CT 和原始 CT 模拟的体外轮廓(上下范围匹配)。结论数控铣削 XPS 泡沫替代丢失或损坏的 RT 固定装置比传统的再模拟更快捷、更方便。与标准固定装置相比,病人固定效果令人满意,剂量学影响较小,机载轮廓与 CT 模拟结果密切相关。我们将与大家分享我们的临床经验、工作流程和制造指南,以帮助其他希望采用这种解决方案的临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信