A prospective multi-institutional trial examining the feasibility, accuracy and learning curve of fluorescence imaging for sentinel node localization in melanoma

Colette R. Pameijer , Rogerio I. Neves , James R. Nitzkorski , Michael C. Lowe
{"title":"A prospective multi-institutional trial examining the feasibility, accuracy and learning curve of fluorescence imaging for sentinel node localization in melanoma","authors":"Colette R. Pameijer ,&nbsp;Rogerio I. Neves ,&nbsp;James R. Nitzkorski ,&nbsp;Michael C. Lowe","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sentinel node biopsy is a standard component of staging for patients with melanoma. Lymphoscintigraphy with technetium99 (<sup>99m</sup>Tc) is highly reliable but not patient centered, requiring a separate visit to radiology and often a painful injection. We assessed intra-operative real-time fluorescence lymphangiography as an alternative to <sup>99m</sup>Tc for sentinel node localization in patients with extremity melanoma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multi-center single arm prospective trial was conducted for patients with extremity melanoma. All subjects had lymphoscintigraphy with <sup>99m</sup>Tc prior to surgery and a dermal injection of indocyanine green in the operating room. The surgeon was blinded to the lymphoscintigraphy results and used real-time fluorescence imaging to localize the sentinel nodes. Success rate and operative times were recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four surgeons enrolled 35 subjects with melanoma of the upper or lower extremity, excluding hands and feet, who met criteria for sentinel node biopsy based on NCCN guidelines. Each surgeon enrolled at least 8 subjects. The overall success rate for the first sentinel node was 83 % (29/35). The success rate varied between the axilla and groin, and between first, second and third sentinel nodes. The average time to identify the first sentinel node was 14 min, with no consistent improvement over time. There were no complications related to the ICG.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The success rate of sentinel node localization with indocyanine green and fluorescence imaging is high, but not high enough to use this method alone. ICG can safely replace blue dye. The learning curve for this technique is likely more than 8 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>ICG and fluorescence imaging may aid in sentinel node localization but should not replace lymphoscintigraphy with <sup>99m</sup>Tc. ICG with fluorescence imaging can safely replace blue dye. The learning curve for this technique is at least 8 patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295024702400080X/pdfft?md5=683c2bca3c4ec84b4155dd046af1108d&pid=1-s2.0-S295024702400080X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295024702400080X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sentinel node biopsy is a standard component of staging for patients with melanoma. Lymphoscintigraphy with technetium99 (99mTc) is highly reliable but not patient centered, requiring a separate visit to radiology and often a painful injection. We assessed intra-operative real-time fluorescence lymphangiography as an alternative to 99mTc for sentinel node localization in patients with extremity melanoma.

Methods

A multi-center single arm prospective trial was conducted for patients with extremity melanoma. All subjects had lymphoscintigraphy with 99mTc prior to surgery and a dermal injection of indocyanine green in the operating room. The surgeon was blinded to the lymphoscintigraphy results and used real-time fluorescence imaging to localize the sentinel nodes. Success rate and operative times were recorded.

Results

Four surgeons enrolled 35 subjects with melanoma of the upper or lower extremity, excluding hands and feet, who met criteria for sentinel node biopsy based on NCCN guidelines. Each surgeon enrolled at least 8 subjects. The overall success rate for the first sentinel node was 83 % (29/35). The success rate varied between the axilla and groin, and between first, second and third sentinel nodes. The average time to identify the first sentinel node was 14 min, with no consistent improvement over time. There were no complications related to the ICG.

Conclusions

The success rate of sentinel node localization with indocyanine green and fluorescence imaging is high, but not high enough to use this method alone. ICG can safely replace blue dye. The learning curve for this technique is likely more than 8 patients.

Synopsis

ICG and fluorescence imaging may aid in sentinel node localization but should not replace lymphoscintigraphy with 99mTc. ICG with fluorescence imaging can safely replace blue dye. The learning curve for this technique is at least 8 patients.

一项前瞻性多机构试验,研究用于黑色素瘤前哨节点定位的荧光成像技术的可行性、准确性和学习曲线
背景前哨节点活检是黑色素瘤患者分期的标准组成部分。使用锝99(99mTc)进行淋巴管造影的可靠性很高,但不是以病人为中心,需要单独到放射科就诊,而且注射时往往很痛苦。我们对四肢黑色素瘤患者术中实时荧光淋巴管造影替代 99mTc 进行前哨节点定位进行了评估。所有受试者都在手术前接受了99m锝淋巴管造影,并在手术室进行了吲哚菁绿的皮肤注射。外科医生对淋巴管造影结果是盲法,并使用实时荧光成像来定位前哨结节。结果四位外科医生共招募了35名上肢或下肢(不包括手和脚)黑色素瘤患者,他们都符合根据NCCN指南进行前哨节点活检的标准。每位外科医生至少招募了 8 名受试者。第一个前哨节点的总体成功率为 83%(29/35)。腋窝和腹股沟的成功率不同,第一个、第二个和第三个前哨结节的成功率也不同。确定第一个前哨结节的平均时间为 14 分钟,随着时间的推移没有持续性的改善。结论使用吲哚菁绿和荧光成像进行前哨节点定位的成功率很高,但还不足以单独使用这种方法。ICG 可以安全地取代蓝色染料。吲哚菁绿和荧光成像可帮助前哨节点定位,但不应取代 99mTc 淋巴闪烁成像。ICG荧光成像可以安全地取代蓝色染料。这项技术的学习曲线至少需要 8 名患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信