Concentrically loaded concrete columns reinforced with steel-FRP composite bars (SFCB) and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer mesh fabric (CFRP-MF) stirrups

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Meizhong Wu, Fang Yuan, Peng Wang, Weiwen Li
{"title":"Concentrically loaded concrete columns reinforced with steel-FRP composite bars (SFCB) and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer mesh fabric (CFRP-MF) stirrups","authors":"Meizhong Wu,&nbsp;Fang Yuan,&nbsp;Peng Wang,&nbsp;Weiwen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Corrosion of rebar is a major cause of performance degradation in coastal structures, and thereby, significantly affects their durability and safety. To address this issue, a new corrosion-resistant reinforced composite structural concrete column were formed by using basalt fibre-reinforced composite bar (SFCB) as the longitudinal reinforcement and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer mesh (CFRP-MF) as an alternative to stirrup. Eight columns were subjected to an axial compression test to determine their capacity. The effects of different combinations of embedded reinforcement, concrete strength, and CFRP-MF stirrup ratio on the cracking performance, ductility, and axial load carrying capacity were investigated. A nonlinear finite element modelling was used to predict axial compressive response of concrete column reinforced with SFCB and CFRP-MF stirrups, and parametric analyses were conducted. The experimental results indicated that all tested columns reinforced with CFRP-MF stirrups were damaged in the central region of the specimens with extensive peeling of the protective layer. To ensure optimal structural safety, it is recommended that SFCB adopt the equal stiffness alternative method to replace longitudinal reinforcement. The substitution increases load-carrying capacity and ductility of the specimen by 5.4 % and 7.8 %, respectively. The study proposes an improved design model for predicting the <em>N</em><sub>u</sub> of columns reinforced with SFCB and CFRP-MF stirrups, which enhances prediction accuracy and precision when compared with existing codes. The findings contribute innovative insights and practical recommendations for advancing the utilization of seawater sea sand concrete and its application in coastal engineering projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424009469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corrosion of rebar is a major cause of performance degradation in coastal structures, and thereby, significantly affects their durability and safety. To address this issue, a new corrosion-resistant reinforced composite structural concrete column were formed by using basalt fibre-reinforced composite bar (SFCB) as the longitudinal reinforcement and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer mesh (CFRP-MF) as an alternative to stirrup. Eight columns were subjected to an axial compression test to determine their capacity. The effects of different combinations of embedded reinforcement, concrete strength, and CFRP-MF stirrup ratio on the cracking performance, ductility, and axial load carrying capacity were investigated. A nonlinear finite element modelling was used to predict axial compressive response of concrete column reinforced with SFCB and CFRP-MF stirrups, and parametric analyses were conducted. The experimental results indicated that all tested columns reinforced with CFRP-MF stirrups were damaged in the central region of the specimens with extensive peeling of the protective layer. To ensure optimal structural safety, it is recommended that SFCB adopt the equal stiffness alternative method to replace longitudinal reinforcement. The substitution increases load-carrying capacity and ductility of the specimen by 5.4 % and 7.8 %, respectively. The study proposes an improved design model for predicting the Nu of columns reinforced with SFCB and CFRP-MF stirrups, which enhances prediction accuracy and precision when compared with existing codes. The findings contribute innovative insights and practical recommendations for advancing the utilization of seawater sea sand concrete and its application in coastal engineering projects.

使用钢-FRP 复合杆(SFCB)和碳纤维增强聚合物网状织物(CFRP-MF)箍筋加固的同心加载混凝土柱
钢筋锈蚀是沿海结构性能下降的主要原因,从而严重影响其耐久性和安全性。为解决这一问题,我们使用玄武岩纤维增强复合筋(SFCB)作为纵向钢筋,并用碳纤维增强聚合物网(CFRP-MF)替代箍筋,形成了一种新型抗腐蚀钢筋复合混凝土结构柱。对八根柱子进行了轴向压缩试验,以确定其承载能力。研究了不同的预埋钢筋组合、混凝土强度和 CFRP-MF 箍筋比对开裂性能、延展性和轴向承载能力的影响。采用非线性有限元模型预测了使用 SFCB 和 CFRP-MF 箍筋加固的混凝土柱的轴向压缩响应,并进行了参数分析。实验结果表明,所有使用 CFRP-MF 箍筋加固的测试柱都在试件中心区域受损,保护层大面积剥落。为确保最佳结构安全性,建议 SFCB 采用等刚度替代法来替换纵向钢筋。这种替代方法可使试件的承载能力和延性分别提高 5.4% 和 7.8%。研究提出了一种改进的设计模型,用于预测使用 SFCB 和 CFRP-MF 箍筋加固的柱子的 Nu 值,与现有规范相比,该模型提高了预测精度和准确性。研究结果为推进海水海砂混凝土的利用及其在海岸工程项目中的应用提供了创新见解和实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信