Comparing four machine learning algorithms for household non-intrusive load monitoring

IF 9.6 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Thomas Lee Young, James Gopsill, Maria Valero, Sindre Eikevåg, Ben Hicks
{"title":"Comparing four machine learning algorithms for household non-intrusive load monitoring","authors":"Thomas Lee Young,&nbsp;James Gopsill,&nbsp;Maria Valero,&nbsp;Sindre Eikevåg,&nbsp;Ben Hicks","doi":"10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The combination of Machine Learning (ML), smart energy meters, and availability of household appliance energy profile data has opened new opportunities for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM). However, the number of options makes it challenging in selecting optimal combinations for different energy applications, which requires studies to examine their trade-offs.</p><p>This paper contributes one such study that investigated four established ML approaches – K Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) – and their performance in classifying appliance events from Alternating Current (AC) and Root Mean Square (RMS) energy data where the sampling frequency and training dataset set size was varied (10 Hz–1 kHz and 50–2000 examples per class, respectively). The computational expense during training, testing and storage was also assessed and evaluated with reference to real-world applications.</p><p>The CNN classifier trained on AC data at 500 Hz and 11,000 examples gave the best F1-score <span><math><mfenced><mrow><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>989</mn></mrow></mfenced></math></span> followed by the KNN classifier <span><math><mfenced><mrow><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>940</mn></mrow></mfenced></math></span>. The storage size required by the CNN models was 3̃MB, which is very close to fitting on cost-effective embedded system microcontrollers. This would prevent high-rate data needing to be sent to the cloud as analysis could be performed on edge computing Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34138,"journal":{"name":"Energy and AI","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100384"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546824000508/pdfft?md5=240b289da6cfc06f2620e646326a2a01&pid=1-s2.0-S2666546824000508-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546824000508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of Machine Learning (ML), smart energy meters, and availability of household appliance energy profile data has opened new opportunities for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM). However, the number of options makes it challenging in selecting optimal combinations for different energy applications, which requires studies to examine their trade-offs.

This paper contributes one such study that investigated four established ML approaches – K Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) – and their performance in classifying appliance events from Alternating Current (AC) and Root Mean Square (RMS) energy data where the sampling frequency and training dataset set size was varied (10 Hz–1 kHz and 50–2000 examples per class, respectively). The computational expense during training, testing and storage was also assessed and evaluated with reference to real-world applications.

The CNN classifier trained on AC data at 500 Hz and 11,000 examples gave the best F1-score 0.989 followed by the KNN classifier 0.940. The storage size required by the CNN models was 3̃MB, which is very close to fitting on cost-effective embedded system microcontrollers. This would prevent high-rate data needing to be sent to the cloud as analysis could be performed on edge computing Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices.

Abstract Image

比较用于家庭非侵入式负荷监测的四种机器学习算法
机器学习(ML)、智能能源计量表和家用电器能源概况数据的结合为非侵入式负荷监测(NILM)带来了新的机遇。然而,由于选项众多,要为不同的能源应用选择最佳组合极具挑战性,这就需要对其权衡利弊进行研究。本文就是这样一项研究,研究了四种成熟的 ML 方法--K 最近邻 (KNN)、支持向量机 (SVM)、极梯度提升 (XGBoost) 和卷积神经网络 (CNN)--以及它们在对交流 (AC) 和均方根 (RMS) 能源数据中的家电事件进行分类时的性能,其中采样频率和训练数据集大小各不相同(分别为 10 Hz-1 kHz 和每类 50-2000 个实例)。在实际应用中,还对训练、测试和存储过程中的计算费用进行了评估和评价。在 500 Hz 和 11,000 个示例的交流电数据上训练的 CNN 分类器给出了最佳 F1 分数 0.989,其次是 KNN 分类器的 0.940。CNN 模型所需的存储容量为 3̃MB,非常接近成本效益型嵌入式系统微控制器的容量。这可以避免将高速数据发送到云端,因为分析可以在边缘计算的物联网(IoT)设备上进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and AI
Energy and AI Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信