Quality Assurance Model for Breast Cancer Prognostication Using the Modified Magee Equations.

Ian Lagerstrom, Daniel Neelon, Nena Wendzel, Stanley Lipkowitz, Joel T Moncur, Stella F Uiterwaal, Justin Wells
{"title":"Quality Assurance Model for Breast Cancer Prognostication Using the Modified Magee Equations.","authors":"Ian Lagerstrom, Daniel Neelon, Nena Wendzel, Stanley Lipkowitz, Joel T Moncur, Stella F Uiterwaal, Justin Wells","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0576-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) is a widely used test that provides prognostic information on the likelihood of disease recurrence and predictive information on the benefit of chemotherapy in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Despite its widespread use, quality assurance of the RS does not receive the same level of scrutiny as other tests, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To use modified Magee equations to calculate Magee score (MS) as a quality check of RS.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The MS is an easily accessible prognostic model that uses histopathologic and immunohistochemical criteria. We identified cases where the RS and MS differed by 10 points or more or were in different risk categories. These instances were considered significant discordances. MS was presented along with RS at multidisciplinary tumor boards and all discrepancies were discussed to determine clinical significance and appropriate next steps.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Twenty-five of 155 cases (16.1%) had discrepancies between RS and MS. Of these 25 cases, 3 (12%) had problems with either the RS or the histopathologic interpretation. Among the cases with concordant RS and MS, no RS or interpretive problems were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Use of the MS as a quality control check for the RS can help ensure appropriate treatment decisions in breast cancer patients. Pathologists can play a key role in ensuring the quality of molecular-based prognostic scores by using histopathologic models to ensure accurate risk stratification and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0576-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: The Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) is a widely used test that provides prognostic information on the likelihood of disease recurrence and predictive information on the benefit of chemotherapy in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Despite its widespread use, quality assurance of the RS does not receive the same level of scrutiny as other tests, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry.

Objective.—: To use modified Magee equations to calculate Magee score (MS) as a quality check of RS.

Design.—: The MS is an easily accessible prognostic model that uses histopathologic and immunohistochemical criteria. We identified cases where the RS and MS differed by 10 points or more or were in different risk categories. These instances were considered significant discordances. MS was presented along with RS at multidisciplinary tumor boards and all discrepancies were discussed to determine clinical significance and appropriate next steps.

Results.—: Twenty-five of 155 cases (16.1%) had discrepancies between RS and MS. Of these 25 cases, 3 (12%) had problems with either the RS or the histopathologic interpretation. Among the cases with concordant RS and MS, no RS or interpretive problems were identified.

Conclusions.—: Use of the MS as a quality control check for the RS can help ensure appropriate treatment decisions in breast cancer patients. Pathologists can play a key role in ensuring the quality of molecular-based prognostic scores by using histopathologic models to ensure accurate risk stratification and improve clinical outcomes.

使用改良马吉方程的乳腺癌诊断质量保证模型
背景Oncotype DX复发评分(RS)是一种广泛使用的检测方法,可为早期激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者提供疾病复发可能性的预后信息和化疗获益的预测信息。尽管 RS 被广泛使用,但其质量保证并没有像其他检测方法(如人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)免疫组化)那样受到严格的审查:使用修正的马吉方程计算马吉评分(MS),作为 RS 的质量检查:MS是一种使用组织病理学和免疫组化标准的易用预后模型。我们确定了 RS 和 MS 相差 10 分或更多或属于不同风险类别的病例。这些情况被视为重大不一致。在多学科肿瘤委员会上,MS与RS一并提交,并对所有差异进行讨论,以确定临床意义和适当的下一步措施:在 155 个病例中,有 25 个病例(16.1%)的 RS 与 MS 存在差异。在这 25 例病例中,有 3 例(12%)在 RS 或组织病理学解释方面存在问题。在RS和MS一致的病例中,没有发现RS或解释方面的问题:使用 MS 作为 RS 的质量控制检查有助于确保对乳腺癌患者做出适当的治疗决定。病理学家可以利用组织病理学模型在确保基于分子的预后评分质量方面发挥关键作用,从而确保准确的风险分层并改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信